Pitch discrimination interference between binaural and monaural or diotic pitches.

Hedwig E Gockel, Robert P Carlyon, Christopher J Plack
Author Information
  1. Hedwig E Gockel: MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, United Kingdom. hedwig.gockel@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk

Abstract

Fundamental frequency (F0) discrimination between two sequentially presented complex (target) tones can be impaired in the presence of an additional complex tone (the interferer) even when filtered into a remote spectral region [Gockel, H., et al. (2004). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 1092-1104]. This "pitch discrimination interference" (PDI) is greatest when the interferer and target have similar F0s. The present study measured PDI using monaural or diotic complex-tone interferers and "Huggins pitch" or diotic complex-tone targets. The first experiment showed that listeners hear a "complex Huggins pitch" (CHP), approximately corresponding to F0, when multiple phase transitions at harmonics of (but not at) F0 are present. The accuracy of pitch matches to the CHP was similar to that for an equally loud diotic tone complex presented in noise. The second experiment showed that PDI can occur when the target is a CHP while the interferer is a diotic or monaural complex tone. In a third experiment, similar amounts of PDI were observed for CHP targets and for loudness-matched diotic complex-tone targets. Thus, a conventional complex tone and CHP appear to be processed in common at the stage where PDI occurs.

References

  1. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Jan;119(1):480-90 [PMID: 16454302]
  2. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Aug;120(2):957-65 [PMID: 16938983]
  3. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Aug;116(2):1092-104 [PMID: 15376675]
  4. J Acoust Soc Am. 1977 Jan;61(1):150-61 [PMID: 833366]
  5. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Dec;124(6):3873-87 [PMID: 19206813]
  6. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Jul;116(1):502-6 [PMID: 15296009]
  7. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Dec;114(6 Pt 1):3317-26 [PMID: 14714812]
  8. J Acoust Soc Am. 1973 Dec;54(6):1496-516 [PMID: 4780803]
  9. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Dec;104(6):3534-45 [PMID: 9857512]
  10. J Acoust Soc Am. 1970 Oct;48(4):924-42 [PMID: 5480388]
  11. J Acoust Soc Am. 1974 May;55(5):1061-9 [PMID: 4833699]
  12. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jan;125(1):324-7 [PMID: 19173419]
  13. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Jun;103(6):3527-39 [PMID: 9637036]
  14. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Aug;98(2 Pt 1):785-97 [PMID: 7642817]
  15. J Acoust Soc Am. 1986 Aug;80(2):429-41 [PMID: 3745675]
  16. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Jun;103(6):3509-26 [PMID: 9637035]
  17. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Jun;117(6):3860-6 [PMID: 16018488]
  18. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Mar;121(3):1604-12 [PMID: 17407897]
  19. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Feb;125(2):1059-66 [PMID: 19206880]
  20. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Jun;95(6):3529-40 [PMID: 8046144]
  21. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 May;91(5):2881-93 [PMID: 1629481]

Grants

  1. MC_U105559842/Medical Research Council
  2. U.1055.04.001.00001.01(80444)/Medical Research Council

MeSH Term

Acoustic Stimulation
Adult
Analysis of Variance
Auditory Perception
Ear
Humans
Middle Aged
Perceptual Masking
Pitch Discrimination
Psychoacoustics
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0dioticcomplexPDICHPtoneF0discriminationtargetinterferersimilarmonauralcomplex-tonetargetsexperimentpresentedcanpresentpitch"showedFundamentalfrequencytwosequentiallytonesimpairedpresenceadditionalevenfilteredremotespectralregion[GockelHetal2004JAcoustSoc1161092-1104]"pitchinterference"greatestF0sstudymeasuredusinginterferers"Hugginsfirstlistenershear"complexHugginsapproximatelycorrespondingmultiplephasetransitionsharmonicsaccuracypitchmatchesequallyloudnoisesecondoccurthirdamountsobservedloudness-matchedThusconventionalappearprocessedcommonstageoccursPitchinterferencebinauralpitches

Similar Articles

Cited By