Clinical information behavior of rehabilitation therapists: a review of the research on occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language pathologists.

Lorie Andrea Kloda, Joan C Bartlett
Author Information
  1. Lorie Andrea Kloda: School of Information Studies, McGill University, McLennan Library Building, 3459 McTavish Street, Montreal, QC H3A 1Y1, Canada. lorie.kloda@mcgill.ca

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The review sought to synthesize existing research relevant to rehabilitation therapists' clinical information behavior and to identify gaps in evidence, particularly in comparison to what is already known about the information behavior of other health professionals, such as physicians.
METHODS: A literature review was conducted of both quantitative and qualitative research studies that included information on the clinical information behavior of occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language pathologists. Findings were organized according to a taxonomy of variables derived from the literature.
RESULTS: Findings from seventeen studies, mostly surveys, conducted since 1990 demonstrate that very little is known about the clinical information needs of and information use by rehabilitation therapists. The sources most often consulted by rehabilitation therapists are printed materials (books and journals) and colleagues. Databases are consulted less often, and few rehabilitation therapists are aware of databases other than MEDLINE.
DISCUSSION: Methodological flaws limit the generalizability and validity of much of the research conducted on the clinical information behavior of this population. More research is needed to better understand the clinical questions that arise in rehabilitation therapists' practice, reasons for consulting certain sources, and ways in which information seeking enhances evidence-based practice.

References

  1. Int J Med Inform. 2007 Jul;76(7):507-13 [PMID: 16597509]
  2. Clin Rehabil. 2000 Dec;14(6):611-7 [PMID: 11128736]
  3. Am J Occup Ther. 2006 Sep-Oct;60(5):524-30 [PMID: 17022340]
  4. J Med Libr Assoc. 2007 Apr;95(2):182-8, e56-7 [PMID: 17443251]
  5. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Jan;94(1):55-60 [PMID: 16404470]
  6. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Mar-Apr;15(2):240-5 [PMID: 18096905]
  7. Health Info Libr J. 2005 Sep;22(3):205-14 [PMID: 16109149]
  8. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1992 Apr;80(2):169-78 [PMID: 1600426]
  9. Int J Med Inform. 2003 Aug;71(1):9-15 [PMID: 12909153]
  10. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2002 Summer;22(3):170-80 [PMID: 12227239]
  11. Health Info Libr J. 2006 Mar;23(1):41-50 [PMID: 16466498]
  12. Ann Intern Med. 1985 Oct;103(4):596-9 [PMID: 4037559]
  13. Physiother Res Int. 1997;2(1):17-29 [PMID: 9238748]
  14. Am J Occup Ther. 2002 May-Jun;56(3):275-84 [PMID: 12058516]
  15. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1995 Apr;83(2):196-201 [PMID: 7599585]
  16. Med Ref Serv Q. 2000 Summer;19(2):27-50 [PMID: 11299647]
  17. BMJ. 2002 Mar 23;324(7339):710 [PMID: 11909789]
  18. Br J Nurs. 2003 Feb 27-Mar 12;12(4):246-53 [PMID: 12671571]
  19. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;:359-63 [PMID: 17238363]
  20. Health Info Libr J. 2002 Mar;19(1):1-13 [PMID: 12075845]
  21. Man Ther. 2000 Nov;5(4):223-6 [PMID: 11052901]
  22. Ann Intern Med. 1991 Apr 1;114(7):576-81 [PMID: 2001091]
  23. Phys Ther. 2003 Sep;83(9):786-805 [PMID: 12940766]
  24. J Med Libr Assoc. 2007 Jan;95(1):64-9 [PMID: 17252068]
  25. Health Info Libr J. 2007 Jun;24(2):78-94 [PMID: 17584211]
  26. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1997 Jul;85(3):223-32 [PMID: 9285121]
  27. J Med Libr Assoc. 2008 Apr;96(2):138-44 [PMID: 18379669]
  28. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 Aug;10(3):413-30 [PMID: 15304142]
  29. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Jun;45(6):954-70 [PMID: 18677809]

MeSH Term

Health Personnel
Humans
Information Storage and Retrieval
Medical Informatics
Physicians
Rehabilitation

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0informationtherapistsrehabilitationresearchclinicalbehaviorreviewconductedtherapists'knownliteraturestudiesoccupationalphysicalspeech-languagepathologistsFindingssourcesoftenconsultedpracticeOBJECTIVES:soughtsynthesizeexistingrelevantidentifygapsevidenceparticularlycomparisonalreadyhealthprofessionalsphysiciansMETHODS:quantitativequalitativeincludedorganizedaccordingtaxonomyvariablesderivedRESULTS:seventeenmostlysurveyssince1990demonstratelittleneedsuseprintedmaterialsbooksjournalscolleaguesDatabaseslessawaredatabasesMEDLINEDISCUSSION:Methodologicalflawslimitgeneralizabilityvaliditymuchpopulationneededbetterunderstandquestionsarisereasonsconsultingcertainwaysseekingenhancesevidence-basedClinicaltherapists:

Similar Articles

Cited By