The effect of rearing environment on blue structural coloration of eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis).

Lynn Siefferman, Geoffrey E Hill
Author Information
  1. Lynn Siefferman: Center for the Integrative Study of Animal Behavior, Indiana University, 402 N. Park Ave., Bloomington, IN 47405, USA e-mail: lsieffer@indiana.edu.

Abstract

We used a brood-size manipulation to test the effect of rearing environment on structural coloration of feathers grown by eastern bluebird (Sialia sialis) nestlings. Ultraviolet (UV)-blue structural coloration has been shown to be sexually selected in this species. Our experimental design took advantage of the growth of UV-blue wing feathers in nestlings that are retained as part of the first nuptial plumage. We cross-fostered nestlings to create enlarged and reduced broods with the purpose of manipulating parental feeding rates and measured the effect on nestling growth and plumage coloration. Brood size influenced feeding rates to offspring, but the effect varied with season. In general, male nestlings reared in reduced broods were fed more often, weighed more, and displayed brighter structural plumage compared to nestlings reared in enlarged broods. Female nestlings appeared to experience less adverse affects of brood enlargement, and we did not detect an effect of brood-size manipulation on the plumage coloration of female nestlings. Measures of plumage coloration in both males and females, however, were correlated to hatching date and nestling mass during feather development. These data provide empirical evidence that environmental quality can influence the development of the blue structural coloration of feathers and that males may be more sensitive to environmental fluctuations than females.

References

  1. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Jun 22;270(1521):1263-70 [PMID: 12816639]
  2. Evolution. 2005 Aug;59(8):1819-28 [PMID: 16331840]
  3. Biol Lett. 2005 Jun 22;1(2):208-11 [PMID: 17148168]
  4. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2007;61(12):1839-1846 [PMID: 19655039]
  5. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Jul 22;270(1523):1455-60 [PMID: 12965009]
  6. Science. 1982 Oct 22;218(4570):384-7 [PMID: 7123238]
  7. Am Nat. 2007 Jan;169(S1):S122-S136 [PMID: 29517928]
  8. J Theor Biol. 1975 Sep;53(1):205-14 [PMID: 1195756]
  9. Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 22;271(1541):771-83 [PMID: 15255094]
  10. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Feb 1;16(2):95-100 [PMID: 11165708]
  11. Science. 1973 Jan 5;179(4068):90-2 [PMID: 4682135]
  12. J Exp Biol. 2002 Dec;205(Pt 23):3747-55 [PMID: 12409501]

Grants

  1. R01 AI049724/NIAID NIH HHS
  2. R01 AI049724-08/NIAID NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0colorationnestlingseffectstructuralplumagefeathersbroodsbrood-sizemanipulationrearingenvironmenteasternSialiasialisgrowthenlargedreducedfeedingratesnestlingrearedmalesfemalesdevelopmentenvironmentalblueusedtestgrownbluebirdUltravioletUV-blueshownsexuallyselectedspeciesexperimentaldesigntookadvantageUV-bluewingretainedpartfirstnuptialcross-fosteredcreatepurposemanipulatingparentalmeasuredBroodsizeinfluencedoffspringvariedseasongeneralmalefedoftenweigheddisplayedbrightercomparedFemaleappearedexperiencelessadverseaffectsbroodenlargementdetectfemaleMeasureshowevercorrelatedhatchingdatemassfeatherdataprovideempiricalevidencequalitycaninfluencemaysensitivefluctuationsbluebirds

Similar Articles

Cited By