Ethical issues in measuring biomarkers in children's environmental health.

Peter D Sly, Brenda Eskenazi, Jenny Pronczuk, Radim Srám, Fernando Diaz-Barriga, Diego Gonzalez Machin, David O Carpenter, Simona Surdu, Eric M Meslin
Author Information
  1. Peter D Sly: WHO Collaborating Centre for Research on Children's Environmental Health, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia. peters@ichr.uwa.edu.au

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studying the impact of environmental exposures is important in children because they are more vulnerable to adverse effects on growth, development, and health. Assessing exposure in children is difficult, and measuring biomarkers is potentially useful. Research measuring biomarkers in children raises a number of ethical issues, some of which relate to children as research subjects and some of which are specific to biomarker research.
OBJECTIVE: As an international group with experience in pediatric research, biomarkers, and the ethics of research in children, we highlight the ethical issues of undertaking biomarker research in children in these environments.
DISCUSSION: Significant issues include undertaking research in vulnerable communities, especially in developing countries; managing community expectations; obtaining appropriate consent to conduct the research; the potential conflicts of obtaining permission from an ethics review board in an economically developed country to perform research in a community that may have different cultural values; returning research results to participants and communities when the researchers are uncertain of how to interpret the results; and the conflicting ethical obligations of maintaining participant confidentiality when information about harm or illegal activities mandate reporting to authorities.
CONCLUSION: None of these challenges are insurmountable and all deserve discussion. Pediatric biomarker research is necessary for advancing child health.

Keywords

References

  1. AIDS. 2007 Nov 30;21(18):2493-501 [PMID: 18025886]
  2. Biochem J. 2006 Oct 1;399(1):161-8 [PMID: 16846394]
  3. Nat Genet. 2007 Nov;39(11):1287 [PMID: 17952070]
  4. Am J Med Genet A. 2008 Feb 1;146A(3):297-304 [PMID: 18205141]
  5. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Dec;113(12):A804-5; author reply A805 [PMID: 16330333]
  6. Hastings Cent Rep. 1976 Dec;6(6):41-6 [PMID: 993016]
  7. J Med Ethics. 2006 Jan;32(1):55-60 [PMID: 16373525]
  8. BMC Med Ethics. 2007 Oct 26;8:11 [PMID: 17963497]
  9. J Indian Med Assoc. 2009 Jun;107(6):403-5 [PMID: 19886379]
  10. Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Jul;114(7):985-91 [PMID: 16835048]
  11. Eur J Pediatr. 2003 Sep;162(9):629-33 [PMID: 12884032]
  12. Eur Respir J. 2006 Nov;28(5):953-9 [PMID: 16870661]
  13. IRB. 2004 Jul-Aug;26(4):1-8 [PMID: 15449408]
  14. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Aug;113(8):1083-91 [PMID: 16079083]
  15. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Apr;121(4):903-9.e6 [PMID: 18234317]
  16. Sci Total Environ. 2008 Feb 15;390(2-3):362-8 [PMID: 18036639]
  17. J Leg Med. 2006 Jun;27(2):119-66 [PMID: 16728351]
  18. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Jul;113(7):813-7 [PMID: 16002367]
  19. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Oct;1140:143-54 [PMID: 18991913]
  20. Chronic Illn. 2006 Sep;2(3):165-77 [PMID: 17007691]
  21. N Engl J Med. 1966 Jun 16;274(24):1354-60 [PMID: 5327352]
  22. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Oct;1140:1-21 [PMID: 18991897]
  23. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2006 Jun;1(2):23-38 [PMID: 19385876]
  24. N Engl J Med. 1997 Sep 18;337(12):847-9 [PMID: 9295243]
  25. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2007 Sep;2(3):15-22 [PMID: 19385847]
  26. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Oct;113(10):1419-29 [PMID: 16203258]
  27. J Occup Environ Med. 2002 Jul;44(7):640-9 [PMID: 12134528]
  28. Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Oct;115(10):1394-400 [PMID: 17938726]
  29. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2004 Sep;26(9):546-8 [PMID: 15342978]
  30. J Paediatr Child Health. 2004 Nov;40(11):593-5 [PMID: 15469525]
  31. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Oct;1140:163-83 [PMID: 18991915]
  32. J Health Law. 2004 Fall;37(4):629-65 [PMID: 15732566]
  33. Hastings Cent Rep. 1976 Aug;6(4):21-30 [PMID: 133992]
  34. Free Radic Biol Med. 2006 Dec 15;41(12):1829-36 [PMID: 17157185]
  35. Lancet. 2008 Jul 5;372(9632):11-3 [PMID: 18603144]
  36. J Med Ethics. 2008 Mar;34(3):171-9 [PMID: 18316458]
  37. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2000 Nov-Dec;10(6 Pt 2):611-29 [PMID: 11138654]
  38. Genet Test. 2004 Fall;8(3):347-55 [PMID: 15727261]
  39. IARC Sci Publ. 1997;(142):313-8 [PMID: 9354930]
  40. Bioethics. 2007 Jul;21(6):305-15 [PMID: 17845454]
  41. N Engl J Med. 2001 Jul 12;345(2):139-42 [PMID: 11450665]
  42. J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):4-13 [PMID: 25951677]
  43. Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Apr;114(4):603-9 [PMID: 16581553]
  44. Lancet. 1996 Oct 19;348(9034):1060-4 [PMID: 8874457]
  45. N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 9;351(11):1057-67 [PMID: 15356303]

Grants

  1. P01 ES009605/NIEHS NIH HHS
  2. 1 R25 TW008183-01/FIC NIH HHS
  3. 5UO1 ESO2617/PHS HHS

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Biomarkers
Child
Child, Preschool
Environmental Exposure
Environmental Health
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Young Adult

Chemicals

Biomarkers

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0researchchildrenbiomarkersissuesenvironmentalhealthmeasuringethicalbiomarkerethicsvulnerableexposureundertakingcommunitiescommunityobtainingconsentresultsBACKGROUND:StudyingimpactexposuresimportantadverseeffectsgrowthdevelopmentAssessingdifficultpotentiallyusefulResearchraisesnumberrelatesubjectsspecificOBJECTIVE:internationalgroupexperiencepediatrichighlightenvironmentsDISCUSSION:SignificantincludeespeciallydevelopingcountriesmanagingexpectationsappropriateconductpotentialconflictspermissionreviewboardeconomicallydevelopedcountryperformmaydifferentculturalvaluesreturningparticipantsresearchersuncertaininterpretconflictingobligationsmaintainingparticipantconfidentialityinformationharmillegalactivitiesmandatereportingauthoritiesCONCLUSION:NonechallengesinsurmountabledeservediscussionPediatricnecessaryadvancingchildEthicalchildren'sbiobanksgeneticsinfantsinformed

Similar Articles

Cited By