Prior Image Constrained Compressed Sensing (PICCS).

Guang-Hong Chen, Jie Tang, Shuai Leng
Author Information
  1. Guang-Hong Chen: Department of Medical Physics and Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI 53792-1590.

Abstract

It has been known for a long time that, in order to reconstruct a streak-free image in tomography, the sampling of view angles should satisfy the Shannon/Nyquist criterion. When the number of view angles is less than the Shannon/Nyquist limit, view aliasing artifacts appear in the reconstructed images. Most recently, it was demonstrated that it is possible to accurately reconstruct a sparse image using highly undersampled projections provided that the samples are distributed at random. The image reconstruction is carried out via an ℓ(1) norm minimization procedure. This new method is generally referred to as compressed sensing (CS) in literature. Specifically, for an N × N image with S significant image pixels, the number of samples for an accurate reconstruction of the image is O(S ln N). In medical imaging, some prior images may be reconstructed from a different scan or from the same acquired time-resolved data set. In this case, a new image reconstruction method, Prior Image Constrained Compressed Sensing (PICCS), has been recently developed to reconstruct images using a vastly undersampled data set. In this paper, we introduce the PICCS algorithm and demonstrate how to use this new algorithm to solve problems in medical imaging.

References

  1. Magn Reson Med. 2008 Feb;59(2):365-73 [PMID: 18228595]
  2. Med Phys. 2007 Sep;34(9):3520-9 [PMID: 17926955]
  3. Magn Reson Med. 2000 Feb;43(2):170-6 [PMID: 10680679]
  4. Magn Reson Med. 2007 Dec;58(6):1182-95 [PMID: 17969013]
  5. Magn Reson Med. 2002 Aug;48(2):297-305 [PMID: 12210938]
  6. Phys Med Biol. 2005 Nov 21;50(22):5263-80 [PMID: 16264252]
  7. Med Phys. 2005 Apr;32(4):1176-86 [PMID: 15895601]
  8. Med Phys. 2006 Oct;33(10):3825-33 [PMID: 17089847]
  9. Magn Reson Med. 2006 Jan;55(1):30-40 [PMID: 16342275]
  10. Phys Med Biol. 2002 Aug 7;47(15):2599-609 [PMID: 12200927]
  11. Phys Med Biol. 2006 Jan 21;51(2):253-67 [PMID: 16394337]
  12. Med Phys. 1985 Mar-Apr;12(2):252-5 [PMID: 4000088]
  13. Med Phys. 2006 Jul;33(7):2354-61 [PMID: 16898437]
  14. Med Phys. 2008 Feb;35(2):660-3 [PMID: 18383687]
  15. Phys Med Biol. 2006 Jun 7;51(11):2939-52 [PMID: 16723776]
  16. Magn Reson Med. 2000 Jan;43(1):91-101 [PMID: 10642735]
  17. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Mar 15;67(4):1211-9 [PMID: 17197125]
  18. Med Phys. 2007 Sep;34(9):3688-95 [PMID: 17926972]
  19. Med Phys. 2007 Nov;34(11):4476-83 [PMID: 18072512]
  20. Magn Reson Med. 2007 Jun;57(6):1086-98 [PMID: 17534903]

Grants

  1. R01 EB005712/NIBIB NIH HHS
  2. R01 EB005712-03/NIBIB NIH HHS
  3. R01 EB007021/NIBIB NIH HHS
  4. R01 EB007021-03/NIBIB NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0imagereconstructviewimagesreconstructionnewNPICCSanglesShannon/NyquistnumberreconstructedrecentlyusingundersampledsamplesmethodSmedicalimagingdatasetPriorImageConstrainedCompressedSensingalgorithmknownlongtimeorderstreak-freetomographysamplingsatisfycriterionlesslimitaliasingartifactsappeardemonstratedpossibleaccuratelysparsehighlyprojectionsprovideddistributedrandomcarriedvia1normminimizationproceduregenerallyreferredcompressedsensingCSliteratureSpecifically×significantpixelsaccurateOlnpriormaydifferentscanacquiredtime-resolvedcasedevelopedvastlypaperintroducedemonstrateusesolveproblems

Similar Articles

Cited By