Genetic differentiation among wild populations of Tribolium castaneum estimated using microsatellite markers.

Douglas W Drury, Ashley L Siniard, Michael J Wade
Author Information
  1. Douglas W Drury: Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. ddrury@indiana.edu

Abstract

We report our characterization of the genetic variation within and differentiation among wild-collected populations of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum, using microsatellite loci identified from its genome sequence. We find that global differentiation, estimated as the average F(ST) across all loci and between all population pairs, is 0.180 (95% confidence intervals of 0.142 and 0.218). A majority of our pairwise population comparisons (>70%) were significant even though this species is considered an excellent colonizer by virtue of its pest status. Regional genetic variation between Tribolium populations is 2-3 times that observed in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. There was a weak positive correlation between genetic distance [F(ST)/(1 - F(ST))] and geographic distance [ln(km)]; pairs of populations with the highest degree of genetic differentiation (F(ST) > 0.29) have been shown to exhibit significant postzygotic reproductive isolation when crossed in previous studies. We discuss the possibility that local extinction and kin-structured colonization have increased the level of genetic differentiation between Tribolium populations.

References

  1. Evolution. 1982 Sep;36(5):949-961 [PMID: 28567828]
  2. J Hered. 1999 Jan-Feb;90(1):191-4 [PMID: 9987929]
  3. Evolution. 1990 Nov;44(7):1717-1724 [PMID: 28567815]
  4. Comput Appl Biosci. 1996 Aug;12(4):357-8 [PMID: 8902363]
  5. Science. 1962 Dec 28;138(3548):1369-75 [PMID: 17753855]
  6. Heredity (Edinb). 2004 Nov;93(5):504-9 [PMID: 15292911]
  7. Genetica. 1998 Oct;104(2):155-9 [PMID: 16220374]
  8. Heredity (Edinb). 1999 May;82 (Pt 5):529-34 [PMID: 10383673]
  9. Evolution. 1991 Nov;45(7):1574-1584 [PMID: 28564129]
  10. Nature. 2008 Apr 24;452(7190):949-55 [PMID: 18362917]
  11. Genetica. 2006 May;127(1-3):143-61 [PMID: 16850220]
  12. Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Mar;24(3):621-31 [PMID: 17150975]
  13. Evolution. 2007 Mar;61(3):494-509 [PMID: 17348915]
  14. Evolution. 1990 Dec;44(8):2004-2011 [PMID: 28564431]
  15. Evolution. 1994 Aug;48(4):1114-1120 [PMID: 28564478]
  16. Evolution. 1988 Jan;42(1):129-137 [PMID: 28563855]
  17. Science. 1992 Apr 3;256(5053):89-92 [PMID: 1566060]
  18. Evolution. 2007 Mar;61(3):694-9 [PMID: 17348932]
  19. Am J Hum Genet. 1967 May;19(3 Pt 1):233-57 [PMID: 6026583]
  20. Evolution. 1984 Sep;38(5):1047-1058 [PMID: 28555799]
  21. Genetics. 2008 May;179(1):455-73 [PMID: 18493064]
  22. Mol Ecol. 2007 Feb;16(3):553-68 [PMID: 17257113]
  23. Biometrics. 1992 Jun;48(2):361-72 [PMID: 1637966]
  24. Evolution. 1980 Jul;34(4):813-821 [PMID: 28563985]
  25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Dec;73(12):4604-7 [PMID: 1070012]
  26. Evolution. 1988 Sep;42(5):995-1005 [PMID: 28581169]

Grants

  1. 5R01GM65414-4/NIGMS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Cluster Analysis
Demography
Electrophoresis, Agar Gel
Genetic Variation
Genetics, Population
Geography
Microsatellite Repeats
Phylogeny
Regression Analysis
Tribolium

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0geneticdifferentiationpopulationsTriboliumST0Fvariationamongcastaneumusingmicrosatellitelociestimatedpopulationpairssignificantdistance]reportcharacterizationwithinwild-collectedredflourbeetleidentifiedgenomesequencefindglobalaverageacross18095%confidenceintervals142218majoritypairwisecomparisons>70%eventhoughspeciesconsideredexcellentcolonizervirtuepeststatusRegional2-3timesobservedfruitflyDrosophilamelanogasterweakpositivecorrelation[F/1-geographic[lnkmhighestdegree>29shownexhibitpostzygoticreproductiveisolationcrossedpreviousstudiesdiscusspossibilitylocalextinctionkin-structuredcolonizationincreasedlevelGeneticwildmarkers

Similar Articles

Cited By