Evaluation of burnout syndrome in oncology employees.

Senem Demirci, Yasemin Kuzeyli Yildirim, Zeynep Ozsaran, Ruchan Uslu, Deniz Yalman, Arif B Aras
Author Information
  1. Senem Demirci: Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ege University, 35100, Izmir, Bornova, Turkey. senem.demirci@ege.edu.tr

Abstract

Burnout is an important occupational problem for health care workers. We aimed to assess the burnout levels among oncology employees and to evaluate the sociodemographic and occupational factors contributing to burnout levels. The Maslach Burnout Inventory, which is designed to measure the three stages of burnout-emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization (DP), and personal accomplishment (PA), was used. The study sample consisted of 90 participants with a median age of 34 (range 23-56). The mean levels of burnout in EE, DP and PA stages were 23.80 +/- 10.98, 5.21 +/- 4.99, and 36.23 +/- 8.05, respectively, for the entire sample. Among the 90 participants, 42, 20, and 35.6% of the employees had high levels of burnout in the EE, DP, and PA substage, respectively. Sociodemographic and occupational factors associated with higher levels of burnout included age of less than 35, being unmarried, being childless, >40 work hours per week, working on night shifts, and <10 years experience in the medicine/oncology field. Within all oncology clinics, medical oncology employees had the highest levels of burnout. Furthermore, employees who are not pleased with working in oncology field, who would like to change their specialty if they have an opportunity, and whose family and social lives have been negatively affected by their work experienced higher levels of burnout. Burnout syndrome may influence physical and mental health of the employee and affects the quality of health care as well. Therefore, several individual or organizational efforts should be considered for dealing with burnout.

References

  1. Br J Cancer. 1995 Jun;71(6):1263-9 [PMID: 7540037]
  2. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:397-422 [PMID: 11148311]
  3. Psychooncology. 2008 Jul;17(7):676-80 [PMID: 17992704]
  4. Aust Health Rev. 2002;25(3):109-21 [PMID: 12136551]
  5. J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jan;92(1):213-27 [PMID: 17227163]
  6. J Cancer Educ. 1997 Fall;12(3):166-73 [PMID: 9376255]
  7. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2007 Jan-Feb;53(1):85-9 [PMID: 17420901]
  8. J Nurs Res. 2001 Dec;9(5):152-64 [PMID: 11779088]
  9. Lancet Oncol. 2001 Dec;2(12):750-5 [PMID: 11902517]
  10. J Clin Oncol. 1991 Oct;9(10):1916-20 [PMID: 1919641]
  11. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2008 Mar;36(2):208-13 [PMID: 18361012]
  12. Cancer Nurs. 2006 Jul-Aug;29(4):338-45 [PMID: 16871102]
  13. Oncology (Williston Park). 2000 Nov;14(11):1621-33; discussion 1633-4, 1636-7 [PMID: 11125944]
  14. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 Aug;22(8):2283-90 [PMID: 17442744]
  15. J Psychoactive Drugs. 1986 Jul-Sep;18(3):247-51 [PMID: 3772650]
  16. Cancer Nurs. 1997 Dec;20(6):414-21 [PMID: 9409063]
  17. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2006 Mar-Apr;52(2):108-12 [PMID: 16767336]
  18. Transplant Proc. 2005 Mar;37(2):1399-401 [PMID: 15848732]
  19. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2008 Nov;17(6):524-31 [PMID: 18771533]
  20. Support Care Cancer. 2009 Jan;17(1):75-81 [PMID: 18528715]
  21. Support Care Cancer. 2008 Feb;16(2):143-50 [PMID: 17619909]
  22. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Dec 12-26;165(22):2601-6 [PMID: 16344417]
  23. Surgery. 2001 Oct;130(4):696-702; discussion 702-5 [PMID: 11602901]
  24. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Mar 1;52(3):816-21 [PMID: 11849806]
  25. Bull Cancer. 2004 Sep;91(9):673-6 [PMID: 15544992]
  26. Lancet. 2005 Aug 27-Sep 2;366(9487):742-4 [PMID: 16125591]
  27. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Mar 5;136(5):358-67 [PMID: 11874308]
  28. Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Jul;94(1):134-9 [PMID: 15262131]
  29. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2000 Aug;35(2):122-5 [PMID: 10918235]
  30. Psychooncology. 2007 May;16(5):421-8 [PMID: 16929464]
  31. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Nov;14(11):3043-53 [PMID: 17828575]
  32. Psychooncology. 2005 Aug;14(8):661-70 [PMID: 15651069]
  33. Can J Psychiatr Nurs. 1979 Nov-Dec;20(6):5-9 [PMID: 260904]
  34. Coll Antropol. 2006 Mar;30(1):131-5 [PMID: 16617587]
  35. CMAJ. 2000 Jul 25;163(2):166-9 [PMID: 10934978]
  36. Psychother Psychosom. 1999;68(6):348-56 [PMID: 10559716]
  37. Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Feb;56(523):87-92 [PMID: 16464320]
  38. QJM. 2006 Mar;99(3):161-9 [PMID: 16490757]
  39. BJOG. 2007 Jan;114(1):94-8 [PMID: 17233864]
  40. J Behav Med. 1995 Dec;18(6):581-99 [PMID: 8749987]
  41. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2006 Jul 01;33(4):815-20 [PMID: 16858463]

MeSH Term

Achievement
Adult
Allied Health Personnel
Attitude of Health Personnel
Burnout, Professional
Cancer Care Facilities
Depersonalization
Female
Hospitals, University
Humans
Job Satisfaction
Male
Medical Oncology
Middle Aged
Nurses
Oncology Nursing
Personality Inventory
Physicians
Risk Factors
Stress, Psychological
Technology, Radiologic
Turkey
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0burnoutlevelsoncologyemployeesBurnoutoccupationalhealthEEDPPA+/-carefactorsstagessample90participantsage23respectively35higherworkworkingfieldsyndromeimportantproblemworkersaimedassessamongevaluatesociodemographiccontributingMaslachInventorydesignedmeasurethreeburnout-emotionalexhaustiondepersonalizationpersonalaccomplishmentusedstudyconsistedmedian34range23-56mean80109852149936805entireAmong42206%highsubstageSociodemographicassociatedincludedlessunmarriedchildless>40hoursperweeknightshifts<10yearsexperiencemedicine/oncologyWithinclinicsmedicalhighestFurthermorepleasedlikechangespecialtyopportunitywhosefamilysociallivesnegativelyaffectedexperiencedmayinfluencephysicalmentalemployeeaffectsqualitywellThereforeseveralindividualorganizationaleffortsconsidereddealingEvaluation

Similar Articles

Cited By