Single-sample discrimination of different schedules' reinforced interresponse times.

Takayuki Tanno, Alan Silberberg, Takayuki Sakagami
Author Information
  1. Takayuki Tanno: epartment of Psychology, Keio University, Tokyo 108-8345, Japan. tantantan@m2.dion.ne.jp

Abstract

Food-deprived rats in Experiment 1 responded to one of two tandem schedules that were, with equal probability, associated with a sample lever. The tandem schedules' initial links were different random-interval schedules. Their values were adjusted to approximate equality in time to completing each tandem schedule's response requirements. The tandem schedules differed in their terminal links: One reinforced short interresponse times; the other reinforced long ones. Tandem-schedule completion presented two comparison levers, one of which was associated with each tandem schedule. Pressing the lever associated with the sample-lever tandem schedule produced a food pellet. Pressing the other produced a blackout. The difference between terminal-link reinforced interresponse times varied across 10-trial blocks within a session. Conditional-discrimination accuracy increased with the size of the temporal difference between terminal-link reinforced interresponse times. In Experiment 2, one tandem schedule was replaced by a random ratio, while the comparison schedule was either a tandem schedule that only reinforced long interresponse times or a random-interval schedule. Again, conditional-discrimination accuracy increased with the temporal difference between the two schedules' reinforced interresponse times. Most rats mastered the discrimination between random ratio and random interval, showing that the interresponse times reinforced by these schedules can serve to discriminate between these schedules.

Keywords

References

  1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 May;49(3):331-8 [PMID: 16812543]
  2. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Mar;23(2):241-6 [PMID: 16811845]
  3. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Sep;28(2):155-61 [PMID: 16812022]
  4. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):247-74 [PMID: 11453618]
  5. Behav Processes. 2008 May;78(1):10-6 [PMID: 18178339]
  6. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Nov;36(3):303-15 [PMID: 7310261]
  7. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Nov;36(3):387-403 [PMID: 16812255]
  8. J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Jan;89(1):5-14 [PMID: 18338672]

MeSH Term

Animals
Conditioning, Operant
Discrimination Learning
Discrimination, Psychological
Male
Rats
Rats, Wistar
Reaction Time
Reinforcement Schedule

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0tandemreinforcedinterresponsetimesscheduleschedulesrandomratioratsonetwoassociatedleverschedules'differenceintervalExperimentdifferentrandom-intervallongcomparisonPressingproducedterminal-linkaccuracyincreasedtemporaldiscriminationvariableFood-deprived1respondedequalprobabilitysampleinitiallinksvaluesadjustedapproximateequalitytimecompletingschedule'sresponserequirementsdifferedterminallinks:OneshortonesTandem-schedulecompletionpresentedleverssample-leverfoodpelletblackoutvariedacross10-trialblockswithinsessionConditional-discriminationsize2replacedeitherconditional-discriminationmasteredshowingcanservediscriminateSingle-sampleinterresponse-timereinforcementpress

Similar Articles

Cited By