Potencies of cocaine methiodide on major cocaine targets in mice.

Erik R Hill, Jinbin Tian, Michael R Tilley, Michael X Zhu, Howard H Gu
Author Information
  1. Erik R Hill: Ohio State Biochemistry Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.

Abstract

Cocaine methiodide (CM), a charged cocaine analog, cannot pass the blood brain barrier. It has been assumed the effects of systemic CM represent cocaine actions in peripheral tissues. However, the IC(50) values of CM have not been clearly determined for the major cocaine targets: dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin transporters, and sodium channels. Using cells transfected with individual transporters from mice and synaptosomes from mouse striatum tissues, we observed that the inhibition IC(50) values for monoamine uptake by CM were 31-fold to 184-fold higher compared to cocaine at each of the transporters. In dorsal root ganglion neurons, cocaine inhibited sodium channels with an apparent IC(50) of 75 microM, while CM showed no observable effect at concentrations up to 3 mM. These results indicate that an equal dose of CM will not produce an equivalent peripheral effect of cocaine.

References

  1. Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Aug;164(8):1149-59 [PMID: 17671276]
  2. Toxicology. 2006 Mar 1;220(1):46-50 [PMID: 16406254]
  3. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1999 Jan;33(1):36-42 [PMID: 9890394]
  4. Neuroscience. 2008 Jul 31;155(1):250-7 [PMID: 18597947]
  5. Eur J Pharmacol. 1992 Mar 17;213(1):99-105 [PMID: 1499661]
  6. Am J Addict. 2007 Mar-Apr;16(2):71-8 [PMID: 17453607]
  7. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1991 May;257(2):706-13 [PMID: 1674533]
  8. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(1):152-60 [PMID: 17401349]
  9. Br J Anaesth. 2002 Jul;89(1):52-61 [PMID: 12173241]
  10. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1993;16:73-93 [PMID: 8096377]
  11. PLoS One. 2008 Aug 06;3(8):e2846 [PMID: 18682722]
  12. J Pharm Sci. 1968 Oct;57(10):1822-3 [PMID: 5684769]
  13. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1978 Jun;205(3):568-76 [PMID: 660530]
  14. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2005 Feb;80(2):281-8 [PMID: 15680181]
  15. Mol Pharmacol. 2001 Jul;60(1):71-9 [PMID: 11408602]
  16. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1995;25(2):113-32 [PMID: 7612173]
  17. J Neurochem. 2005 Jul;94(2):352-9 [PMID: 15998286]
  18. BMC Pharmacol. 2006 Mar 03;6:6 [PMID: 16515684]
  19. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1971 Jan;189(1):198-208 [PMID: 5130150]
  20. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993 Oct;267(1):266-74 [PMID: 7901394]
  21. J Physiol. 2007 Feb 15;579(Pt 1):1-14 [PMID: 17158175]
  22. Neuropharmacology. 2009 Feb;56(2):399-404 [PMID: 18824182]
  23. Eur J Neurosci. 2006 Aug;24(4):1182-92 [PMID: 16930444]
  24. Curr Biol. 1996 Aug 1;6(8):935-6 [PMID: 8805320]
  25. Life Sci. 1990;46(9):635-45 [PMID: 2308472]

Grants

  1. R01 DA014610/NIDA NIH HHS
  2. R01 DA020124/NIDA NIH HHS
  3. R01DA020124/NIDA NIH HHS
  4. R01DA014610/NIDA NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Cocaine
Dopamine
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Inhibitory Concentration 50
Male
Mice
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Models, Biological
Neurons
Norepinephrine
Patch-Clamp Techniques
Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins
Synaptosomes

Chemicals

Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins
cocaine methiodide
Cocaine
Dopamine
Norepinephrine

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cocaineCMIC50transportersmethiodideperipheraltissuesvaluesmajorsodiumchannelsmiceeffectCocainechargedanalogpassbloodbrainbarrierassumedeffectssystemicrepresentactionsHoweverclearlydeterminedtargets:dopaminenorepinephrineserotoninUsingcellstransfectedindividualsynaptosomesmousestriatumobservedinhibitionmonoamineuptake31-fold184-foldhighercompareddorsalrootganglionneuronsinhibitedapparent75microMshowedobservableconcentrations3mMresultsindicateequaldosewillproduceequivalentPotenciestargets

Similar Articles

Cited By