Trust, terrorism and public health.

Martin McKee, Richard Coker
Author Information
  1. Martin McKee: European Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK. martin.mckee@lshtm.ac.uk

Abstract

Policies to promote public health are based on trust. There is a danger that public trust may be lost, especially where policies are seen to be influenced by vested interests or conflict with available evidence. Although trust in public health policies in the UK is high, some commentators have questioned recent responses to the threat of pandemic flu, suggesting that they may be driven, in part, by those seeking to profit from health scares, and drawing a direct comparison with terrorist scares. We argue that the approach to evidence by the public health and counter-terrorist communities differ markedly. Public health professionals must ensure that their actions do not undermine their credibility, in particular those involved in response to the threat of bioterrorism.

MeSH Term

Bioterrorism
Humans
Public Health
Public Policy
Trust
United Kingdom

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthpublictrustmaypoliciesevidencethreatscaresPoliciespromotebaseddangerlostespeciallyseeninfluencedvestedinterestsconflictavailableAlthoughUKhighcommentatorsquestionedrecentresponsespandemicflusuggestingdrivenpartseekingprofitdrawingdirectcomparisonterroristargueapproachcounter-terroristcommunitiesdiffermarkedlyPublicprofessionalsmustensureactionsunderminecredibilityparticularinvolvedresponsebioterrorismTrustterrorism

Similar Articles

Cited By