Platelet function analysis: a comparison of methods.

Andrew Morris, Bernadette Aliprandi-Costa, David Brieger
Author Information

Abstract

Variability in response to clopidogrel has been well described, with residual platelet reactivity (RPR) after treatment in 5-44% of patients. New point-of-care (POC) devices have been developed in an attempt to identify poor responders at risk of adverse outcomes, with a view to eventually guide titration of anti-platelets. We sought to assess sensitivity/specificity of the Accumetrics VerifyNow device for measuring responsiveness to clopidogrel in patients undergoing elective PCI compared to the more specific tool: flow-cytometric analysis using VAsodilator-Stimulated Phosphoprotein (VASP). Our findings suggest that larger replication studies and standardised guidelines are required before POC devices may be routinely used in clinical practice.

MeSH Term

Aged
Clopidogrel
Female
Flow Cytometry
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Phosphoproteins
Platelet Aggregation
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
Point-of-Care Systems
Ticlopidine

Chemicals

Phosphoproteins
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
Clopidogrel
Ticlopidine

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0clopidogrelpatientsPOCdevicesVariabilityresponsewelldescribedresidualplateletreactivityRPRtreatment5-44%Newpoint-of-caredevelopedattemptidentifypoorrespondersriskadverseoutcomesvieweventuallyguidetitrationanti-plateletssoughtassesssensitivity/specificityAccumetricsVerifyNowdevicemeasuringresponsivenessundergoingelectivePCIcomparedspecifictool:flow-cytometricanalysisusingVAsodilator-StimulatedPhosphoproteinVASPfindingssuggestlargerreplicationstudiesstandardisedguidelinesrequiredmayroutinelyusedclinicalpracticePlateletfunctionanalysis:comparisonmethods

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.