Need for recovery from work in relation to age: a prospective cohort study.

D C L Mohren, N W H Jansen, Ij Kant
Author Information
  1. D C L Mohren: CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. DCL.Mohren@epid.unimaas.nl

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of increasing age on the need for recovery (NFR) over time among day workers
METHODS: The study is based on data from the first 2 years of follow-up of the Maastricht Cohort Study (n = 7,734). To investigate whether age predicted the onset of elevated NFR, multivariate survival analyses were conducted
RESULTS: The highest levels of NFR were observed in the age group of 46-55 years. The relative risk for developing elevated NFR was highest in the age groups 36-45 years (RR 1.30; 1.07-1.58) and 46-55 years (RR 1.25; 1.03-1.52) in men and 46-55 years (RR 1.36; 1.04-1.77) in women when compared to the reference group
CONCLUSIONS: While NFR increased with age until the age of 55, this was followed by decreased levels of NFR among older employees. Explanations for the decreasing levels of NFR in the highest age group can be found in several domains such as the work environment, private situation and compensation strategies.

References

  1. J Psychosom Res. 2003 Oct;55(4):331-9 [PMID: 14507544]
  2. J Psychosom Res. 2001 Jan;50(1):29-37 [PMID: 11259798]
  3. J Clin Nurs. 2006 Feb;15(2):219-26 [PMID: 16422739]
  4. Ergonomics. 2007 Nov;50(11):1914-30 [PMID: 17972209]
  5. Occup Environ Med. 2003 Jun;60 Suppl 1:i83-7 [PMID: 12782752]
  6. J Occup Environ Med. 2003 May;45(5):479-91 [PMID: 12769054]
  7. Occup Environ Med. 2001 Aug;58(8):546-52 [PMID: 11452053]
  8. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2007 Apr;33(2):105-113 [PMID: 17460798]
  9. Can J Aging. 2006 Winter;25(4):387-400 [PMID: 17310459]
  10. Occup Environ Med. 1995 Jul;52(7):464-9 [PMID: 7670621]
  11. Am J Ind Med. 2008 Apr;51(4):269-80 [PMID: 18271000]
  12. Am Psychol. 1994 Apr;49(4):304-13 [PMID: 8203802]
  13. Occup Environ Med. 2003 Jun;60 Suppl 1:i32-9 [PMID: 12782745]
  14. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008 Jan;81(3):311-20 [PMID: 17576592]
  15. Am J Ind Med. 2008 Aug;51(8):610-25 [PMID: 18543279]
  16. Ergonomics. 1999 Apr;42(4):573-83 [PMID: 10204421]
  17. Occup Environ Med. 2003 Jun;60 Suppl 1:i3-9 [PMID: 12782740]
  18. Int J Behav Med. 2002;9(4):322-40 [PMID: 12512472]
  19. Health Econ. 2008 May;17(5):619-38 [PMID: 17935200]
  20. Occup Environ Med. 2003 Jun;60 Suppl 1:i88-92 [PMID: 12782753]
  21. J Psychosom Res. 2009 Feb;66(2):137-45 [PMID: 19154856]
  22. Int J Behav Med. 2006;13(3):183-92 [PMID: 17078768]
  23. J Occup Health. 2006 Jan;48(1):11-9 [PMID: 16484758]
  24. Ergonomics. 2003 Jun 10;46(7):664-80 [PMID: 12745680]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aging
Fatigue
Female
Health Behavior
Health Status
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Occupational Diseases
Prospective Studies
Socioeconomic Factors
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ageNFR1yearshighestlevels46-55RRinvestigaterecoveryamongstudyelevatedgroupworkPURPOSE:impactincreasingneedtimedayworkersMETHODS:baseddatafirst2follow-upMaastrichtCohortStudyn=7734whetherpredictedonsetmultivariatesurvivalanalysesconductedRESULTS:observedrelativeriskdevelopinggroups36-453007-1582503-152men3604-177womencomparedreferencegroupCONCLUSIONS:increased55followeddecreasedolderemployeesExplanationsdecreasingcanfoundseveraldomainsenvironmentprivatesituationcompensationstrategiesNeedrelationage:prospectivecohort

Similar Articles

Cited By