Idiom comprehension in Mandarin-speaking children.

Shelley Ching-Yu Hsieh, Chun-Chieh Natalie Hsu
Author Information
  1. Shelley Ching-Yu Hsieh: Department/Graduate Institute of Foreign Languages and Literature, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Road, Tainan 701, Taiwan, ROC. shelley@mail.ncku.edu.tw

Abstract

This study examines the effect of familiarity, context, and linguistic convention on Idiom comprehension in Mandarin speaking children. Two experiments (a comprehension task followed by a comprehension task coupled with a metapragmatic task) were administered to test participants in three age groups (6 and 9-year-olds, and an adult control group). Laval (Journal of Pragmatics 35(2):723-739, 2003) showed that familiarity had an effect on Idiom comprehension for French 9-year-olds. However, our finding showed that familiarity was important for 6-year-old Chinese children when a context was not given. Abkarian et al. (Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 35:580-587, 1992) claimed that context has little or no effect on comprehension for children under 6. Our results show that context has an effect on 6-year-old children's understanding of idioms in a different way. Overall, our major research findings are: (1) Familiarity first appeared in responses at age 6. (2) Context played an important role in Idiom comprehension and had different effects on different age groups. (3) Linguistic convention starts from age 6 on, and a significant effect took place at the age of 9. (4) Metapragmatic knowledge showed at the age of 6 and could surface even younger. As context and linguistic convention have a substantial effect on the comprehension of idioms, it is necessary to take them into account to explain language functioning and communicative situations.

References

  1. J Child Lang. 1992 Jun;19(2):415-33 [PMID: 1527209]
  2. Child Dev. 1996 Dec;67(6):2823-40 [PMID: 9071763]
  3. Child Dev. 1993 Oct;64(5):1534-49 [PMID: 8222887]
  4. Cognition. 2005 Jun;96(2):93-108 [PMID: 15925571]
  5. Brain Lang. 2004 Dec;91(3):303-14 [PMID: 15533556]
  6. J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Jun;34(3):613-20 [PMID: 2072685]
  7. J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Aug;36(4):728-37 [PMID: 8377485]
  8. Cogn Psychol. 1998 Nov;37(2):156-200 [PMID: 9878105]
  9. J Speech Hear Res. 1992 Jun;35(3):580-7 [PMID: 1608249]
  10. J Speech Hear Res. 1995 Apr;38(2):426-33 [PMID: 7596108]
  11. J Child Lang. 2002 Feb;29(1):127-50 [PMID: 11968879]
  12. J Child Lang. 1987 Oct;14(3):569-86 [PMID: 2447110]
  13. J Speech Hear Res. 1996 Apr;39(2):442-7 [PMID: 8729932]
  14. J Child Lang. 1979 Oct;6(3):469-91 [PMID: 536411]
  15. J Speech Hear Res. 1989 Mar;32(1):59-66 [PMID: 2704202]
  16. J Speech Hear Res. 1975 Sep;18(3):521-9 [PMID: 1186161]
  17. J Exp Child Psychol. 1995 Oct;60(2):261-83 [PMID: 7561672]
  18. J Child Lang. 1989 Jun;16(2):387-405 [PMID: 2474558]

MeSH Term

Age Factors
Child
Comprehension
Female
Humans
Knowledge
Language
Language Tests
Male
Recognition, Psychology

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0comprehensioneffectagecontext6childrenfamiliarityconventionidiomtaskshoweddifferentlinguisticgroups9-year-oldsJournal2important6-year-oldidiomsstudyexaminesMandarinspeakingTwoexperimentsfollowedcoupledmetapragmaticadministeredtestparticipantsthreeadultcontrolgroupLavalPragmatics35:723-7392003FrenchHoweverfindingChinesegivenAbkarianet alSpeechHearingResearch35:580-5871992claimedlittleresultsshowchildren'sunderstandingwayOverallmajorresearchfindingsare:1FamiliarityfirstappearedresponsesContextplayedroleeffects3Linguisticstartssignificanttookplace94MetapragmaticknowledgesurfaceevenyoungersubstantialnecessarytakeaccountexplainlanguagefunctioningcommunicativesituationsIdiomMandarin-speaking

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)