Tests to measure the quality of spermatozoa at spermiation.

Rupert P Amann
Author Information
  1. Rupert P Amann: Colorado State University, Ft Collins, 80526-1683, USA. rpalra62@comcast.net

Abstract

This commentary is to critique the revised World Health Organization (WHO) semen analysis manual as it pertains to characteristics of a spermatozoon at spermiation. The aims of the revised WHO manual include improving the 'quality of semen analysis' without any restriction to clinical use. Furthermore, the manual states that semen analysis may be useful for (a) 'investigating male fertility status' and (b) 'monitoring spermatogenesis during and following male fertility regulation.' However, if the analysis of ejaculated spermatozoa is intended for the purposes described in (b), then cells that are abnormal at spermiation must be identified. This paper takes the position that the manual does not identify methods to estimate the quality of spermatozoa at spermiation. Instead, it uses a 'gold standard' of sperm passing through the cervical mucus or arriving near the site of fertilization. Although this standard is appropriate for drawing conclusions regarding the probability that an individual could impregnate his partner, it is not appropriate for studying illness of the testes per se. Herein, the measures of sperm quality presented in the WHO manual are critiqued with respect to the detection of spermatozoa that were abnormal at spermiation vs. those that became abnormal subsequently. Quality assessments based on the percentage of motile or 'viable' spermatozoa are meaningless. Alternative quality attributes defining spermatozoa at spermiation are presented in this paper. In conclusion, assessment of spermatozoal quality at spermiation, on the basis of quality attributes of individual ejaculated spermatozoa, is best achieved through application of (a) a new paradigm for the morphological evaluation of sperm quality and (b) modern analytical techniques to evaluate, in an adequate sample, several appropriate independent attributes in each spermatozoon in order to more accurately identify the proportion of abnormal spermatozoa.

References

  1. J Androl. 2009 Nov-Dec;30(6):642-9 [PMID: 19443908]
  2. Biol Reprod. 1993 Aug;49(2):274-80 [PMID: 8373950]
  3. Hum Reprod. 1999 Aug;14(8):2007-14 [PMID: 10438418]
  4. Asian J Androl. 2007 Jul;9(4):483-91 [PMID: 17589785]
  5. Hum Reprod. 1994 Nov;9(11):2187-99 [PMID: 7868697]
  6. Environ Health Perspect. 1991 Aug;94:143-6 [PMID: 1954925]
  7. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2006 May 16;250(1-2):36-42 [PMID: 16431015]
  8. J Androl. 2009 Nov-Dec;30(6):626-41 [PMID: 19443909]
  9. Andrologia. 2003 Dec;35(6):358-67 [PMID: 15018138]
  10. Int J Androl. 2000 Apr;23(2):77-84 [PMID: 10762433]
  11. Theriogenology. 2008 Aug;70(3):473-8 [PMID: 18495234]
  12. Biol Reprod. 1993 Jul;49(1):166-75 [PMID: 8353184]
  13. Hum Reprod. 1997 Dec;12(12):2720-3 [PMID: 9455842]
  14. Hum Reprod. 1993 Jul;8(7):1070-3 [PMID: 8408489]
  15. J Androl. 2008 Sep-Oct;29(5):469-87 [PMID: 18497337]
  16. J Reprod Fertil. 1962 Apr;3:260-8 [PMID: 13860858]
  17. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1973 Jul;18:199-213 [PMID: 4516681]
  18. Hum Reprod. 2001 Sep;16(9):1912-21 [PMID: 11527898]
  19. J Androl. 1993 Nov-Dec;14(6):397-406 [PMID: 8294222]
  20. J Androl. 1998 Jan-Feb;19(1):11-20 [PMID: 9537287]
  21. Mol Reprod Dev. 1993 Mar;34(3):292-8 [PMID: 8471251]
  22. Microsc Res Tech. 2003 May 1;61(1):7-17 [PMID: 12672118]
  23. J Androl. 2004 Sep-Oct;25(5):671-8 [PMID: 15292094]
  24. Hum Reprod. 2007 May;22(5):1413-9 [PMID: 17303629]
  25. Fertil Steril. 2003 Jun;79 Suppl 3:1616-24 [PMID: 12801568]
  26. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008 Apr;16(4):570-9 [PMID: 18413066]
  27. Adv Biosci. 1973;10:145-55 [PMID: 4618526]
  28. Biol Reprod. 2000 Sep;63(3):925-32 [PMID: 10952940]
  29. J Androl. 2004 Jul-Aug;25(4):593-604 [PMID: 15223848]
  30. Mol Hum Reprod. 2004 May;10(5):365-72 [PMID: 15044602]
  31. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007 May;14(5):650-63 [PMID: 17509211]
  32. Int J Androl. 1983 Aug;6(4):310-8 [PMID: 6618687]
  33. J Androl. 1993 Nov-Dec;14(6):456-63 [PMID: 8294230]

MeSH Term

Diagnostic Tests, Routine
Humans
Infertility, Male
Male
Manuals as Topic
Semen Analysis
Spermatogenesis
Spermatozoa
World Health Organization

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0spermatozoaspermiationqualitymanualabnormalWHOsemenanalysisbspermappropriateattributesrevisedspermatozoonmalefertilityejaculatedpaperidentifyindividualpresentedcommentarycritiqueWorldHealthOrganizationpertainscharacteristicsaimsincludeimproving'qualityanalysis'withoutrestrictionclinicaluseFurthermorestatesmayuseful'investigatingstatus''monitoringspermatogenesisfollowingregulation'HoweverintendedpurposesdescribedcellsmustidentifiedtakespositionmethodsestimateInsteaduses'goldstandard'passingcervicalmucusarrivingnearsitefertilizationAlthoughstandarddrawingconclusionsregardingprobabilityimpregnatepartnerstudyingillnesstestesperseHereinmeasurescritiquedrespectdetectionvsbecamesubsequentlyQualityassessmentsbasedpercentagemotile'viable'meaninglessAlternativedefiningconclusionassessmentspermatozoalbasisbestachievedapplicationnewparadigmmorphologicalevaluationmodernanalyticaltechniquesevaluateadequatesampleseveralindependentorderaccuratelyproportionTestsmeasure

Similar Articles

Cited By