Leaf species identity and combination affect performance and oviposition choice of two container mosquito species.

Michael H Reiskind, Krystle L Greene, L Philip Lounibos
Author Information
  1. Michael H Reiskind: Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory, Vero Beach, Florida, U.S.A.

Abstract

1. Resource diversity can be an important determinant of individual and population performance in insects. Fallen parts of plants form the nutritive base for many aquatic systems, including mosquito habitats, but the effect of plant diversity on mosquito production is poorly understood.2. To determine the effects of diverse plant inputs on larval mosquitoes, experiments were conducted that examined how leaves of Vitis aestivalis, Quercus virginiana, Psychotria nervosa, and Nephrolepis exalta affected the container species Aedes triseriatus and Aedes albopictus.3. The hypothesis that leaf species have different effects on larval survival, growth, population performance, and oviposition choice of the two mosquito species was tested. The hypothesis that larval performance of A. albopictus responds additively to combinations of the four plant species was also tested.4. Larval survival and growth differed among the four leaf species, and oviposition preference differed among the two leaf species examined. Measurements of population performance demonstrated significant variation between leaf treatments. Larval outcomes for A. albopictus were significantly affected by leaf combination, and the hypothesis of additivity could be rejected.5. These results indicate that individual leaf species are important in determining the performance of container dwelling mosquitoes, which grow larger and survive better on mixed-species resource than expected based on an additive model of resource utilisation.

References

  1. Science. 1991 Jul 12;253(5016):189-91 [PMID: 1853204]
  2. J Evol Biol. 2003 Jul;16(4):721-30 [PMID: 14632235]
  3. Oecologia. 2005 Dec;146(3):432-42 [PMID: 16096846]
  4. J Med Entomol. 1970 Dec;7(6):708-12 [PMID: 5501239]
  5. Nature. 2006 Oct 26;443(7114):989-92 [PMID: 17066035]
  6. J Med Entomol. 2007 Mar;44(2):215-21 [PMID: 17427689]
  7. Ecology. 2007 May;88(5):1167-76 [PMID: 17536403]
  8. J Med Entomol. 1998 Nov;35(6):967-76 [PMID: 9835688]
  9. Oecologia. 2006 Mar;147(3):469-78 [PMID: 16425049]
  10. Annu Rev Entomol. 2001;46:729-60 [PMID: 11112185]
  11. Ecology. 2007 Jan;88(1):219-27 [PMID: 17489470]
  12. J Med Entomol. 2001 Sep;38(5):711-9 [PMID: 11580044]
  13. Freshw Biol. 2006 Mar;51(3):448-459 [PMID: 17476312]
  14. J Med Entomol. 1989 May;26(3):210-6 [PMID: 2724318]
  15. Oecologia. 1982 Apr;53(1):1-6 [PMID: 28310595]
  16. J Invertebr Pathol. 2000 Jan;75(1):9-18 [PMID: 10631052]
  17. J Chem Ecol. 2002 May;28(5):983-95 [PMID: 12049235]
  18. Annu Rev Entomol. 1992;37:349-76 [PMID: 1347208]
  19. J Med Entomol. 2002 Jul;39(4):699-704 [PMID: 12144308]
  20. J Med Entomol. 2008 May;45(3):375-83 [PMID: 18533429]
  21. Oecologia. 2004 May;139(4):583-93 [PMID: 15024640]
  22. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 12;105(6):1977-82 [PMID: 18238894]
  23. J Vector Ecol. 2000 Dec;25(2):212-7 [PMID: 11217219]
  24. J Anim Ecol. 2007 Nov;76(6):1105-15 [PMID: 17922707]
  25. J Med Entomol. 2006 May;43(3):484-92 [PMID: 16739405]
  26. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2005 Sep 1;98(5):673-681 [PMID: 22661766]
  27. Science. 1987 May 29;236(4805):1114-6 [PMID: 3576225]
  28. J Vector Ecol. 2002 Jun;27(1):31-8 [PMID: 12125870]
  29. Ecology. 2005 Dec;86(12):3289-95 [PMID: 17450188]
  30. Theor Popul Biol. 1978 Dec;14(3):350-6 [PMID: 751265]
  31. J Vector Ecol. 2002 Jun;27(1):86-95 [PMID: 12125878]
  32. Oecologia. 1999 Jul;120(1):147-155 [PMID: 28308046]

Grants

  1. R01 AI044793-05A2/NIAID NIH HHS
  2. R01 AI044793-06/NIAID NIH HHS
  3. R01 AI044793-08/NIAID NIH HHS
  4. R01 AI044793/NIAID NIH HHS
  5. R01 AI044793-07/NIAID NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0speciesperformanceleafmosquitopopulationplantlarvalcontaineralbopictushypothesisovipositiontwodiversityimportantindividualeffectsmosquitoesexaminedaffectedAedessurvivalgrowthchoicetestedfourLarvaldifferedamongcombinationresource1ResourcecandeterminantinsectsFallenpartsplantsformnutritivebasemanyaquaticsystemsincludinghabitatseffectproductionpoorlyunderstood2determinediverseinputsexperimentsconductedleavesVitisaestivalisQuercusvirginianaPsychotrianervosaNephrolepisexaltatriseriatus3differentrespondsadditivelycombinationsalso4preferenceMeasurementsdemonstratedsignificantvariationtreatmentsoutcomessignificantlyadditivityrejected5resultsindicatedeterminingdwellinggrowlargersurvivebettermixed-speciesexpectedbasedadditivemodelutilisationLeafidentityaffect

Similar Articles

Cited By (22)