Individual variation in pheromone response correlates with reproductive traits and brain gene expression in worker honey bees.

Sarah D Kocher, Julien F Ayroles, Eric A Stone, Christina M Grozinger
Author Information
  1. Sarah D Kocher: Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America. skocher@gmail.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Variation in individual behavior within social groups can affect the fitness of the group as well as the individual, and can be caused by a combination of genetic and environmental factors. However, the molecular factors associated with individual variation in social behavior remain relatively unexplored. We used honey bees (Apis mellifera) as a model to examine differences in socially-regulated behavior among individual workers, and used transcriptional profiling to determine if specific gene expression patterns are associated with these individual differences. In honey bees, the reproductive queen produces a pheromonal signal that regulates many aspects of worker behavior and physiology and maintains colony organization.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here, we demonstrate that there is substantial natural variation in individual worker attraction to queen pheromone (QMP). Furthermore, worker attraction is negatively correlated with ovariole number-a trait associated with reproductive potential in workers. We identified transcriptional differences in the adult brain associated with individual worker attraction to QMP, and identified hundreds of transcripts that are organized into statistically-correlated gene networks and associated with this response.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our studies demonstrate that there is substantial variation in worker attraction to QMP among individuals, and that this variation is linked with specific differences in physiology and brain gene expression patterns. This variation in individual response thresholds may reveal underlying variation in queen-worker reproductive conflict, and may mediate colony function and productivity by creating variation in individual task performance.

References

  1. Nat Genet. 2009 Mar;41(3):299-307 [PMID: 19234471]
  2. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Aug;22(8):408-13 [PMID: 17573148]
  3. Science. 2008 Mar 28;319(5871):1827-30 [PMID: 18339900]
  4. Nat Genet. 2002 Oct;32(2):261-6 [PMID: 12219088]
  5. Science. 2004 Jul 16;305(5682):402-4 [PMID: 15218093]
  6. Horm Behav. 2002 Sep;42(2):222-31 [PMID: 12367575]
  7. J Chem Ecol. 2005 Nov;31(11):2731-45 [PMID: 16273438]
  8. Genetics. 1998 Mar;148(3):1203-13 [PMID: 9539435]
  9. J Comp Physiol A. 2001 Feb;187(1):53-61 [PMID: 11318378]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Nov 25;100 Suppl 2:14519-25 [PMID: 14573707]
  11. Nature. 2006 Jan 5;439(7072):76-8 [PMID: 16397498]
  12. Science. 2003 Oct 10;302(5643):296-9 [PMID: 14551438]
  13. Annu Rev Entomol. 2008;53:523-42 [PMID: 17877458]
  14. Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Jan 7;274(1606):67-72 [PMID: 17015336]
  15. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Jan 7;270(1510):99-103 [PMID: 12596763]
  16. J Comp Physiol A. 1994 Jun;174(6):731-9 [PMID: 8014920]
  17. Annu Rev Entomol. 2001;46:413-40 [PMID: 11112175]
  18. J Chem Ecol. 1981 May;7(3):543-54 [PMID: 24420593]
  19. J Comp Physiol B. 2006 Jan;176(1):55-63 [PMID: 16228242]
  20. Naturwissenschaften. 2006 Apr;93(4):195-9 [PMID: 16518641]
  21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Sep 4;104(36):14383-8 [PMID: 17761794]
  22. Science. 2008 Nov 7;322(5903):896-900 [PMID: 18988841]
  23. Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Feb 22;275(1633):393-402 [PMID: 18055387]
  24. BMC Dev Biol. 2007 Jun 18;7:70 [PMID: 17577409]
  25. Genome Biol. 2003;4(5):P3 [PMID: 12734009]
  26. J Exp Biol. 2008 Sep;211(Pt 18):3041-56 [PMID: 18775941]
  27. Genes Brain Behav. 2002 Nov;1(4):197-203 [PMID: 12882364]
  28. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Dec 14;101(50):17559-64 [PMID: 15572455]
  29. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2007 Apr;193(4):461-70 [PMID: 17192826]
  30. Naturwissenschaften. 2000 Nov;87(11):487-90 [PMID: 11151667]
  31. J Comput Biol. 2001;8(6):625-37 [PMID: 11747616]
  32. Mol Ecol. 2007 Nov;16(22):4837-48 [PMID: 17927707]
  33. PLoS Genet. 2008 Jul 18;4(7):e1000127 [PMID: 18636101]
  34. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Feb;23(2):59-60 [PMID: 18215440]
  35. Am Nat. 2009 Mar;173(3):E99-E107 [PMID: 19140771]
  36. Science. 2007 Jul 20;317(5836):362-4 [PMID: 17641199]
  37. J Insect Physiol. 1998 Jul;44(7-8):685-692 [PMID: 12769952]
  38. Methods Enzymol. 2006;411:214-33 [PMID: 16939792]
  39. Behav Ecol. 2009 Sep;20(5):1007-1014 [PMID: 22476212]
  40. J Evol Biol. 2007 May;20(3):831-44 [PMID: 17465894]
  41. Bioessays. 2007 Apr;29(4):334-43 [PMID: 17373656]
  42. J Comp Neurol. 2003 Nov 24;466(4):564-76 [PMID: 14566950]
  43. PLoS One. 2007 Oct 03;2(10):e980 [PMID: 17912357]
  44. Naturwissenschaften. 2007 Apr;94(4):247-67 [PMID: 17171388]
  45. Naturwissenschaften. 2003 Oct;90(10):477-80 [PMID: 14564409]
  46. Bioinformatics. 2006 Jun 15;22(12):1540-2 [PMID: 16595560]
  47. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 31;103(44):16068-75 [PMID: 17065327]
  48. Mol Ecol. 2006 Apr;15(5):1197-211 [PMID: 16626448]
  49. Genome Biol. 2001;2(1):RESEARCH0001 [PMID: 11178278]
  50. BMC Genomics. 2008 May 19;9:232 [PMID: 18489784]
  51. PLoS Genet. 2009 May;5(5):e1000479 [PMID: 19424432]

MeSH Term

Animals
Bees
Brain
Cluster Analysis
Female
Gene Expression Profiling
Gene Regulatory Networks
Insect Proteins
Male
Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
Ovary
Pheromones
Reproduction
Sexual Behavior, Animal
Social Behavior

Chemicals

Insect Proteins
Pheromones

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0individualvariationworkerassociatedbehaviordifferencesgenereproductiveattractionhoneybeesexpressionQMPbrainresponsesocialcanfactorsusedamongworkerstranscriptionalspecificpatternsqueenphysiologycolonydemonstratesubstantialpheromoneidentifiedmayBACKGROUND:VariationwithingroupsaffectfitnessgroupwellcausedcombinationgeneticenvironmentalHowevermolecularremainrelativelyunexploredApismelliferamodelexaminesocially-regulatedprofilingdetermineproducespheromonalsignalregulatesmanyaspectsmaintainsorganizationMETHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALFINDINGS:naturalFurthermorenegativelycorrelatedovariolenumber-atraitpotentialadulthundredstranscriptsorganizedstatistically-correlatednetworksCONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE:studiesindividualslinkedthresholdsrevealunderlyingqueen-workerconflictmediatefunctionproductivitycreatingtaskperformanceIndividualcorrelatestraits

Similar Articles

Cited By