What can natural selection explain?

Ulrich E Stegmann
Author Information
  1. Ulrich E Stegmann: Department of Philosophy, University of Aberdeen, Old Brewery, Aberdeen, AB24 3UB, United Kingdom. u.stegmann@abdn.ac.uk

Abstract

One approach to assess the explanatory power of natural selection is to ask what type of facts it can explain. The standard list of explananda includes facts like trait frequencies or the survival of particular organisms. Here, I argue that this list is incomplete: natural selection can also explain a specific kind of individual-level fact that involves traits. The ability of selection to explain this sort of fact ('trait facts') vindicates the explanatory commitments of empirical studies on microevolution. Trait facts must be distinguished from a closely related kind of fact, that is, the fact that a particular individual x has one trait rather than another. Whether or not selection can explain the latter type of fact is highly controversial. According to the so-called 'Negative View' it cannot be explained by selection. I defend the Negative View against Nanay's (2005) objection.

MeSH Term

Animals
Biological Evolution
Genetics
Phenotype
Selection, Genetic

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0selectionfactcanexplainnaturalfactsexplanatorytypelisttraitparticularkindOneapproachassesspoweraskstandardexplanandaincludeslikefrequenciessurvivalorganismsargueincomplete:alsospecificindividual-levelinvolvestraitsabilitysort'traitfacts'vindicatescommitmentsempiricalstudiesmicroevolutionTraitmustdistinguishedcloselyrelatedindividualxoneratheranotherWhetherlatterhighlycontroversialAccordingso-called'NegativeView'explaineddefendNegativeViewNanay's2005objectionexplain?

Similar Articles

Cited By