A visual distracter task during adaptation reduces the proprioceptive movement aftereffect.

Tatjana Seizova-Cajic, Rita Azzi
Author Information
  1. Tatjana Seizova-Cajic: Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia. tatjana.seizova-cajic@sydney.edu.au

Abstract

Visual processing of basic perceptual attributes depends on attention. This has been well documented since the surprising initial report on attentional modulation of the visual motion aftereffect (Chaudhuri 1990). Here, we investigate proprioception and show for the first time that attention modulates adaptation to perceived limb movement. We used biceps vibration to induce illusory forearm extension in 10 participants and measured the aftereffect-perceived movement in the opposite direction. The aftereffect was largest when participants focused on the illusory extension during the adaptation period. To divert attention away from the illusory extension, a rapid serial visual presentation task was performed during the adaptation. The aftereffect was much smaller in this condition, indicating interference between the visual task and proprioceptive adaptation. In tests of an analogous interaction between audition and vision, earlier research found no effect. We suggest that conscious proprioception requires more attention than conscious processing of visual or auditory input.

References

  1. Arch Ital Biol. 1980 Mar;118(1):51-71 [PMID: 7458531]
  2. Neurosci Lett. 1998 Dec 24;258(3):147-50 [PMID: 9885952]
  3. Brain. 1972;95(4):705-48 [PMID: 4265060]
  4. Brain Res. 2006 Oct 9;1114(1):75-84 [PMID: 16920087]
  5. PLoS One. 2007 Oct 17;2(10):e1037 [PMID: 17940601]
  6. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Jan;59(1):2-27 [PMID: 16556554]
  7. Vision Res. 2007 Jan;47(2):166-78 [PMID: 17116314]
  8. Vision Res. 1995 May;35(10):1401-12 [PMID: 7645269]
  9. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Feb;4(2):42-50 [PMID: 10652521]
  10. J Physiol. 1976 Oct;261(3):695-711 [PMID: 135841]
  11. Brain Res. 1998 Apr 27;791(1-2):167-76 [PMID: 9593876]
  12. Vision Res. 2009 Jun;49(10):1174-81 [PMID: 18834897]
  13. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Dec;12(12):481-7 [PMID: 18951829]
  14. J Vis. 2009 Apr 22;9(4):17.1-13 [PMID: 19757926]
  15. Nature. 1990 Mar 1;344(6261):60-2 [PMID: 2304555]
  16. J Neurophysiol. 2009 Feb;101(2):633-40 [PMID: 19036863]
  17. Nat Neurosci. 2004 Jan;7(1):70-4 [PMID: 14647291]
  18. Nat Neurosci. 2004 Mar;7(3):308-13 [PMID: 14966522]
  19. Nat Neurosci. 1999 Nov;2(11):1015-8 [PMID: 10526342]
  20. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:57-78 [PMID: 17417935]

MeSH Term

Adaptation, Psychological
Arm
Attention
Female
Humans
Illusions
Male
Motor Activity
Neuropsychological Tests
Photic Stimulation
Physical Stimulation
Proprioception
Psychomotor Performance
Vibration
Visual Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0visualadaptationattentionaftereffectmovementillusoryextensiontaskprocessingproprioceptionparticipantsproprioceptiveconsciousVisualbasicperceptualattributesdependswelldocumentedsincesurprisinginitialreportattentionalmodulationmotionChaudhuri1990investigateshowfirsttimemodulatesperceivedlimbusedbicepsvibrationinduceforearm10measuredaftereffect-perceivedoppositedirectionlargestfocusedperioddivertawayrapidserialpresentationperformedmuchsmallerconditionindicatinginterferencetestsanalogousinteractionauditionvisionearlierresearchfoundeffectsuggestrequiresauditoryinputdistracterreduces

Similar Articles

Cited By