Informal urban settlements and cholera risk in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Katherine Penrose, Marcia Caldas de Castro, Japhet Werema, Edward T Ryan
Author Information
  1. Katherine Penrose: Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America. kpenrose@post.harvard.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As a result of poor economic opportunities and an increasing shortage of affordable housing, much of the spatial growth in many of the world's fastest-growing cities is a result of the expansion of informal settlements where residents live without security of tenure and with limited access to basic infrastructure. Although inadequate water and sanitation facilities, crowding and other poor living conditions can have a significant impact on the spread of infectious diseases, analyses relating these diseases to ongoing global urbanization, especially at the neighborhood and household level in informal settlements, have been infrequent. To begin to address this deficiency, we analyzed urban environmental data and the burden of cholera in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Cholera incidence was examined in relation to the percentage of a ward's residents who were informal, the percentage of a ward's informal residents without an improved water source, the percentage of a ward's informal residents without improved sanitation, distance to the nearest cholera treatment facility, population density, median asset index score in informal areas, and presence or absence of major roads. We found that cholera incidence was most closely associated with informal housing, population density, and the income level of informal residents. Using data available in this study, our model would suggest nearly a one percent increase in cholera incidence for every percentage point increase in informal residents, approximately a two percent increase in cholera incidence for every increase in population density of 1000 people per km(2) in Dar es Salaam in 2006, and close to a fifty percent decrease in cholera incidence in wards where informal residents had minimally improved income levels, as measured by ownership of a radio or CD player on average, in comparison to wards where informal residents did not own any items about which they were asked. In this study, the range of access to improved sanitation and improved water sources was quite narrow at the ward level, limiting our ability to discern relationships between these variables and cholera incidence. Analysis at the individual household level for these variables would be of interest.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results suggest that ongoing global urbanization coupled with urban poverty will be associated with increased risks for certain infectious diseases, such as cholera, underscoring the need for improved infrastructure and planning as the world's urban population continues to expand.

References

  1. Infect Immun. 2005 Oct;73(10):6674-9 [PMID: 16177344]
  2. JAMA. 2004 Jun 2;291(21):2547-54 [PMID: 15173145]
  3. PLoS Med. 2006 Jun;3(6):e280 [PMID: 16789802]
  4. Ambio. 2007 Jun;36(4):350-8 [PMID: 17626474]
  5. Lancet. 2004 Jan 17;363(9404):223-33 [PMID: 14738797]
  6. Nature. 2002 Jun 6;417(6889):642-5 [PMID: 12050664]
  7. J Health Popul Nutr. 2004 Jun;22(2):130-8 [PMID: 15473516]
  8. Demography. 2001 Feb;38(1):115-32 [PMID: 11227840]
  9. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006 Nov;75(5):973-7 [PMID: 17123999]
  10. Lancet. 2009 Mar 21;373(9668):993-4 [PMID: 19330941]
  11. Demography. 2005 Aug;42(3):397-425 [PMID: 16235606]
  12. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1136:298-306 [PMID: 17954669]
  13. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Jun;1023:300-7 [PMID: 15253912]
  14. PLoS Pathog. 2008 Oct;4(10):e1000187 [PMID: 18949027]
  15. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Sep;79(3):414-21 [PMID: 18784235]
  16. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 8;354(23):2500-2 [PMID: 16760452]
  17. Arch Dis Child. 2005 Nov;90(11):1175-81 [PMID: 15964861]
  18. Lancet. 1995 Feb 11;345(8946):339-44 [PMID: 7646638]
  19. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 May;14(5):831-3 [PMID: 18439375]
  20. Eur J Epidemiol. 1999 Apr;15(4):367-70 [PMID: 10414378]
  21. Nutrition. 2003 Nov-Dec;19(11-12):1006-12 [PMID: 14624955]
  22. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:341-65 [PMID: 15760293]
  23. Health Policy Plan. 1995 Jun;10(2):109-21 [PMID: 10143449]
  24. PLoS Med. 2006 Jan;3(1):e7 [PMID: 16318414]
  25. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008 Apr 23;2(4):e228 [PMID: 18431445]
  26. N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 20;361(8):741-3 [PMID: 19692687]
  27. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2003 Aug;206(4-5):269-78 [PMID: 12971682]
  28. Int J Health Geogr. 2008 Aug 12;7:44 [PMID: 18700026]

Grants

  1. U01 AI058935/NIAID NIH HHS
  2. U01 AI077883/NIAID NIH HHS
  3. AI058935/NIAID NIH HHS
  4. AI077883/NIAID NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Cholera
Humans
Incidence
Population Density
Risk Assessment
Socioeconomic Factors
Tanzania
Urban Population

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0informalcholeraresidentsincidenceimprovedlevelurbanpercentagepopulationincreasesettlementswithoutwatersanitationdiseasesDaresSalaamward'sdensitypercentresultpoorhousingworld'saccessinfrastructureinfectiousongoingglobalurbanizationhouseholddataTanzaniaassociatedincomestudysuggesteverywardsvariablesBACKGROUND:economicopportunitiesincreasingshortageaffordablemuchspatialgrowthmanyfastest-growingcitiesexpansionlivesecuritytenurelimitedbasicAlthoughinadequatefacilitiescrowdinglivingconditionscansignificantimpactspreadanalysesrelatingespeciallyneighborhoodinfrequentbeginaddressdeficiencyanalyzedenvironmentalburdenMETHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALFINDINGS:CholeraexaminedrelationsourcedistancenearesttreatmentfacilitymedianassetindexscoreareaspresenceabsencemajorroadsfoundcloselyUsingavailablemodelnearlyonepointapproximatelytwo1000peopleperkm22006closefiftydecreaseminimallylevelsmeasuredownershipradioCDplayeraveragecomparisonitemsaskedrangesourcesquitenarrowwardlimitingabilitydiscernrelationshipsAnalysisindividualinterestCONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE:resultscoupledpovertywillincreasedriskscertainunderscoringneedplanningcontinuesexpandInformalrisk

Similar Articles

Cited By