Evolutionary persistence of functional compensation by duplicate genes in Arabidopsis.

Kousuke Hanada, Takashi Kuromori, Fumiyoshi Myouga, Tetsuro Toyoda, Wen-Hsiung Li, Kazuo Shinozaki
Author Information
  1. Kousuke Hanada: Gene Discovery Research Group, RIKEN Plant Science Center, 1-7-22 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan. kohanada@psc.riken.jp

Abstract

Knocking out a gene from a genome often causes no phenotypic effect. This phenomenon has been explained in part by the existence of duplicate genes. However, it was found that in mouse knockout data duplicate genes are as essential as singleton genes. Here, we study whether it is also true for the knockout data in Arabidopsis. From the knockout data in Arabidopsis thaliana obtained in our study and in the literature, we find that duplicate genes show a significantly lower proportion of knockout effects than singleton genes. Because the persistence of duplicate genes in evolution tends to be dependent on their phenotypic effect, we compared the ages of duplicate genes whose knockout mutants showed less severe phenotypic effects with those with more severe effects. Interestingly, the latter group of genes tends to be more anciently duplicated than the former group of genes. Moreover, using multiple-gene knockout data, we find that functional compensation by duplicate genes for a more severe phenotypic effect tends to be preserved by natural selection for a longer time than that for a less severe effect. Taken together, we conclude that duplicate genes contribute to genetic robustness mainly by preserving compensation for severe phenotypic effects in A. thaliana.

Keywords

References

  1. Trends Genet. 2008 Oct;24(10):485-8 [PMID: 18786741]
  2. J Mol Evol. 2008 Dec;67(6):705-9 [PMID: 19005716]
  3. Plant Physiol. 2008 Oct;148(2):993-1003 [PMID: 18715958]
  4. Trends Plant Sci. 2006 Oct;11(10):492-8 [PMID: 16949326]
  5. Trends Genet. 2009 Apr;25(4):152-5 [PMID: 19285746]
  6. BMC Genomics. 2008 Dec 16;9:609 [PMID: 19087332]
  7. Nature. 1997 Jul 10;388(6638):167-71 [PMID: 9217155]
  8. Science. 2004 Nov 19;306(5700):1367-70 [PMID: 15550669]
  9. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Nov 11;22(22):4673-80 [PMID: 7984417]
  10. Plant J. 2006 Aug;47(4):640-51 [PMID: 16813574]
  11. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Mar 31;95(7):3708-13 [PMID: 9520431]
  12. Nature. 2003 Jan 2;421(6918):63-6 [PMID: 12511954]
  13. Genome Biol. 2006;7(8):R69 [PMID: 16884526]
  14. Trends Genet. 2007 Aug;23(8):375-8 [PMID: 17512629]
  15. Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jan 7;271(1534):89-96 [PMID: 15002776]
  16. Science. 2000 Nov 10;290(5494):1151-5 [PMID: 11073452]
  17. WormBook. 2005 Jun 25;:1-6 [PMID: 18023122]
  18. Genome Res. 2008 Jul;18(7):1092-9 [PMID: 18463300]
  19. PLoS Genet. 2008 Dec;4(12):e1000311 [PMID: 19096706]
  20. Plant Physiol. 2003 Feb;131(2):409-18 [PMID: 12586866]
  21. Trends Genet. 2007 Aug;23(8):378-81 [PMID: 17559966]
  22. Nat Genet. 2008 May;40(5):676-81 [PMID: 18408719]
  23. Cell. 2009 Feb 6;136(3):389-92 [PMID: 19203571]
  24. Genetics. 2000 Mar;154(3):1389-401 [PMID: 10757778]
  25. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402 [PMID: 9254694]
  26. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 29;105(4):1243-8 [PMID: 18216251]

Grants

  1. R01 GM030998/NIGMS NIH HHS
  2. R37 GM030998/NIGMS NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0genesduplicatephenotypicknockouteffectseveredataArabidopsiseffectscompensationthalianatendsfunctionalsingletonstudyfindpersistencelessgroupselectiongeneticrobustnessKnockinggenegenomeoftencausesphenomenonexplainedpartexistenceHoweverfoundmouseessentialwhetheralsotrueobtainedliteratureshowsignificantlylowerproportionevolutiondependentcomparedageswhosemutantsshowedInterestinglylatterancientlyduplicatedformerMoreoverusingmultiple-genepreservednaturallongertimeTakentogetherconcludecontributemainlypreservingEvolutionarypressure

Similar Articles

Cited By