Critical thinking dispositions among newly graduated nurses.

Sigrid Wangensteen, Inger S Johansson, Monica E Björkström, Gun Nordström
Author Information
  1. Sigrid Wangensteen: Department of Nursing, Karlstad University, Sweden. sigrid.wangensteen@hig.no

Abstract

AIM: The aim of the study was to describe critical thinking dispositions among newly graduated nurses in Norway, and to study whether background data had any impact on critical thinking dispositions.
BACKGROUND: Competence in critical thinking is one of the expectations of nursing education. Critical thinkers are described as well-informed, inquisitive, open-minded and orderly in complex matters. Critical thinking competence has thus been designated as an outcome for judging the quality of nursing education programmes and for the development of clinical judgement. The ability to think critically is also described as reducing the research-practice gap and fostering evidence-based nursing.
METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed. The data were collected between October 2006 and April 2007 using the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. The response rate was 33% (n = 618). Pearson's chi-square tests were used to analyse the data.
RESULTS: Nearly 80% of the respondents reported a positive disposition towards critical thinking. The highest mean score was on the Inquisitiveness subscale and the lowest on the Truth-seeking subscale. A statistically significant higher proportion of nurses with high critical thinking scores were found among those older than 30 years, those with university education prior to nursing education, and those working in community health care.
CONCLUSION: Nurse leaders and nurse teachers should encourage and nurture critical thinking among newly graduated nurses and nursing students. The low Truth-seeking scores found may be a result of traditional teaching strategies in nursing education and might indicate a need for more student-active learning models.

References

  1. J Adv Nurs. 2003 Nov;44(3):298-307 [PMID: 14641400]
  2. J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jul;17(14):1877-85 [PMID: 18578762]
  3. Br J Nurs. 2006 Apr 27-May 10;15(8):458-61 [PMID: 16723953]
  4. Nurse Educ Today. 2008 Jul;28(5):627-32 [PMID: 18054412]
  5. J Gerontol Nurs. 2004 Mar;30(3):26-33 [PMID: 15061451]
  6. J Nurs Educ. 1994 Oct;33(8):345-50 [PMID: 7799093]
  7. J Adv Nurs. 1998 Aug;28(2):323-31 [PMID: 9725729]
  8. J Nurs Educ. 1996 Jan;35(1):12-8 [PMID: 8926509]
  9. Nurse Educ Today. 2003 Nov;23(8):566-74 [PMID: 14554110]
  10. J Nurs Educ. 1997 Jan;36(1):5-10 [PMID: 8986955]
  11. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2000 Nov-Dec;31(6):251-6 [PMID: 11865857]
  12. Nurse Educ. 2001 May-Jun;26(3):125-7 [PMID: 12144324]
  13. J Adv Nurs. 2003 May;42(3):288-96 [PMID: 12680973]
  14. West J Nurs Res. 2003 Apr;25(3):322-37 [PMID: 12705114]
  15. J Adv Nurs. 2000 Jul;32(1):84-90 [PMID: 10886438]
  16. J Nurs Educ. 1999 Apr;38(4):149-55 [PMID: 10225262]
  17. J Nurs Educ. 1997 Jan;36(1):11-8 [PMID: 8986956]
  18. Nurse Educ Today. 2007 Jul;27(5):420-6 [PMID: 16945453]
  19. Nurse Educ. 1997 Sep-Oct;22(5):29-33 [PMID: 9348885]
  20. J Prof Nurs. 2005 Nov-Dec;21(6):364-71 [PMID: 16311232]
  21. J Nurs Educ. 1997 Jan;36(1):46-8 [PMID: 8986961]
  22. Nurse Educ. 2006 Jul-Aug;31(4):159-62 [PMID: 16855484]
  23. J Adv Nurs. 2003 Sep;43(6):569-77 [PMID: 12950562]
  24. Nurse Educ Pract. 2007 Jan;7(1):53-9 [PMID: 17689424]
  25. J Nurs Educ. 1999 Mar;38(3):100-10 [PMID: 10102507]
  26. J Adv Nurs. 2000 Feb;31(2):288-97 [PMID: 10672085]
  27. Holist Nurs Pract. 2001 Jul;15(4):65-74 [PMID: 12120497]
  28. Scand J Caring Sci. 1992;6(3):161-4 [PMID: 1439377]
  29. NLN Publ. 1989 Nov;(15-2278):iii-xix, 1-394 [PMID: 2587197]
  30. J Nurs Educ. 2003 Jan;42(1):14-27 [PMID: 12555818]
  31. Nurse Educ Today. 2004 May;24(4):286-92 [PMID: 15110438]
  32. J Adv Nurs. 2009 Jan;65(1):139-48 [PMID: 19032517]

MeSH Term

Adult
Age Factors
Cross-Sectional Studies
Education, Nursing
Educational Status
Exploratory Behavior
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Male
Norway
Nurses
Nursing Education Research
Nursing Staff, Hospital
Problem Solving
Public Health Nursing
Set, Psychology
Students, Nursing
Surveys and Questionnaires
Thinking

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0thinkingcriticalnursingeducationamongnursesCriticalstudydispositionsnewlygraduateddatadescribedsubscaleTruth-seekingscoresfoundAIM:aimdescribeNorwaywhetherbackgroundimpactBACKGROUND:Competenceoneexpectationsthinkerswell-informedinquisitiveopen-mindedorderlycomplexmatterscompetencethusdesignatedoutcomejudgingqualityprogrammesdevelopmentclinicaljudgementabilitythinkcriticallyalsoreducingresearch-practicegapfosteringevidence-basedMETHODS:cross-sectionaldescriptiveperformedcollectedOctober2006April2007usingCaliforniaThinkingDispositionInventoryresponserate33%n=618Pearson'schi-squaretestsusedanalyseRESULTS:Nearly80%respondentsreportedpositivedispositiontowardshighestmeanscoreInquisitivenessloweststatisticallysignificanthigherproportionhigholder30yearsuniversitypriorworkingcommunityhealthcareCONCLUSION:Nurseleadersnurseteachersencouragenurturestudentslowmayresulttraditionalteachingstrategiesmightindicateneedstudent-activelearningmodels

Similar Articles

Cited By