Predictors of blood transfusion requirement in elective liver resection.

Andrew J Cockbain, Tahir Masudi, J Peter A Lodge, Giles J Toogood, K Raj Prasad
Author Information
  1. Andrew J Cockbain: Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Liver resection remains major surgery frequently requiring intra-operative blood transfusion. patients are typically over cross-matched, and with blood donor numbers falling, cross-matching and transfusion policies need rationalizing.
AIM: To identify predictors of peri-operative blood transfusion.
METHODS: A retrospective review of elective hepatic resections over a 4-year period was performed. Twenty-six variables including clinicopathological variables and intra-operative data were collated, together with the number of units of blood cross-matched and transfused in the immediate peri-operative period (48 h). Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of blood transfusion, and a Risk Score for transfusion constructed.
RESULTS: Five hundred and eighty-nine patients were included in the study, and were cross-matched with a median 10 units of blood. Seventeen per cent of patients received a blood transfusion; median transfusion when required was 2 units. Regression analysis identified seven factors predictive of transfusion: haemoglobin <12.5 g/dL, pre-operative biliary drainage, coronary artery disease, largest tumour >3.5 cm, cholangiocarcinoma, redo resection and extended resection (5+ segments). patients were stratified into high or low risk of transfusion based on Risk Score with a sensitivity of 73% [receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) 0.77].
CONCLUSIONS: patients undergoing elective liver resection are over-cross-matched. patients can be classified into high and low risk of transfusion using a Risk Score, and cross-matched accordingly.

References

  1. Ann Surg. 2003 Mar;237(3):417-21 [PMID: 12616127]
  2. Anesth Analg. 2003 Feb;96(2):369-75, table of contents [PMID: 12538179]
  3. J Surg Res. 2007 Jul;141(1):97-104 [PMID: 17574043]
  4. Am J Surg. 1998 Jun;175(6):461-5 [PMID: 9645772]
  5. Br J Surg. 1998 Jan;85(1):63-7 [PMID: 9462386]
  6. Lancet. 1981 Aug 15;2(8242):363 [PMID: 6115133]
  7. Br J Surg. 1995 Mar;82(3):377-81 [PMID: 7796016]
  8. Br J Haematol. 2001 Apr;113(1):24-31 [PMID: 11328275]
  9. Br J Surg. 2003 Jan;90(1):23-8 [PMID: 12520570]
  10. Am J Surg. 1994 Feb;167(2):256-60 [PMID: 8135315]
  11. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;(1):CD005033 [PMID: 16437512]
  12. Surg Oncol. 2007 Dec;16 Suppl 1:S177-82 [PMID: 18023576]
  13. Transfusion. 1995 Aug;35(8):640-4 [PMID: 7631403]
  14. HPB (Oxford). 2002;4(1):5-10 [PMID: 18333146]
  15. Surgery. 2005 Feb;137(2):148-55 [PMID: 15674194]
  16. Surgery. 1999 Feb;125(2):166-71 [PMID: 10026750]
  17. BMC Surg. 2008 Jan 25;8:3 [PMID: 18221510]
  18. Br J Surg. 1995 Dec;82(12):1637-40 [PMID: 8548226]
  19. Liver Transpl. 2006 Nov;12(11):1584-93 [PMID: 16952177]
  20. Eur J Cancer. 1995 Jul-Aug;31A(7-8):1226-8 [PMID: 7577027]
  21. Am J Surg. 1997 Apr;173(4):275-9 [PMID: 9136779]
  22. Br J Surg. 2007 Jul;94(7):860-5 [PMID: 17380562]
  23. Ann Surg. 2003 Jun;237(6):860-9; discussion 869-70 [PMID: 12796583]
  24. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000 Aug;26(5):492-7 [PMID: 11016472]
  25. Lancet. 1982 Sep 18;2(8299):662 [PMID: 6125797]
  26. J Clin Oncol. 1994 Sep;12(9):1859-67 [PMID: 8083709]
  27. J Surg Oncol. 2008 Oct 1;98(5):371-6 [PMID: 18646038]
  28. Transfusion. 1976 Jul-Aug;16(4):380-7 [PMID: 951737]

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Blood Grouping and Crossmatching
Blood Loss, Surgical
Blood Transfusion
Chi-Square Distribution
Elective Surgical Procedures
Female
Hepatectomy
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Perioperative Care
ROC Curve
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0transfusionbloodresectionPatientscross-matchedelectiveunitsRiskScoreintra-operativeidentifypredictorsperi-operativeperiodperformedvariablesanalysispatientsmedian5highlowriskliverBACKGROUND:Liverremainsmajorsurgeryfrequentlyrequiringtypicallydonornumbersfallingcross-matchingpoliciesneedrationalizingAIM:METHODS:retrospectivereviewhepaticresections4-yearTwenty-sixincludingclinicopathologicaldatacollatedtogethernumbertransfusedimmediate48hMultivariateregressionindependentconstructedRESULTS:Fivehundredeighty-nineincludedstudy10Seventeenpercentreceivedrequired2Regressionidentifiedsevenfactorspredictivetransfusion:haemoglobin<12g/dLpre-operativebiliarydrainagecoronaryarterydiseaselargesttumour>3cmcholangiocarcinomaredoextended5+segmentsstratifiedbasedsensitivity73%[receiver-operatingcharacteristicROC077]CONCLUSIONS:undergoingover-cross-matchedcanclassifiedusingaccordinglyPredictorsrequirement

Similar Articles

Cited By (13)