Population based allele frequencies of disease associated polymorphisms in the Personalized Medicine Research Project.

Deanna S Cross, Lynn C Ivacic, Elisha L Stefanski, Catherine A McCarty
Author Information
  1. Deanna S Cross: Center for Human Genetics, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, WI, USA. cross.deanna@mcrf.mfldclin.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of knowledge regarding the frequency of disease associated polymorphisms in populations and population attributable risk for many populations remains unknown. Factors that could affect the association of the allele with disease, either positively or negatively, such as race, ethnicity, and gender, may not be possible to determine without population based allele frequencies.Here we used a panel of 51 polymorphisms previously associated with at least one disease and determined the allele frequencies within the entire Personalized Medicine Research Project population based cohort. We compared these allele frequencies to those in dbSNP and other data sources stratified by race. Differences in allele frequencies between self reported race, region of origin, and sex were determined.
RESULTS: There were 19544 individuals who self reported a single racial category, 19027 or (97.4%) self reported white Caucasian, and 11205 (57.3%) individuals were female. Of the 11,208 (57%) individuals with an identifiable region of origin 8337 or (74.4%) were German.41 polymorphisms were significantly different between self reported race at the 0.05 level. Stratification of our Caucasian population by self reported region of origin revealed 19 polymorphisms that were significantly different (p = 0.05) between individuals of different origins. Further stratification of the population by gender revealed few significant differences in allele frequencies between the genders.
CONCLUSIONS: This represents one of the largest population based allele frequency studies to date. Stratification by self reported race and region of origin revealed wide differences in allele frequencies not only by race but also by region of origin within a single racial group. We report allele frequencies for our Asian/Hmong and American Indian populations; these two minority groups are not typically selected for population allele frequency detection. Population wide allele frequencies are important for the design and implementation of studies and for determining the relevance of a disease associated polymorphism for a given population.

References

  1. BMC Genet. 2008 Aug 19;9:54 [PMID: 18713460]
  2. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Jan 1;29(1):308-11 [PMID: 11125122]
  3. Oncol Rep. 2008 Nov;20(5):1213-20 [PMID: 18949424]
  4. Science. 2002 Apr 12;296(5566):261-2 [PMID: 11954565]
  5. Biostatistics. 2009 Apr;10(2):297-309 [PMID: 19075295]
  6. BMC Genomics. 2008 Apr 29;9:198 [PMID: 18445251]
  7. JAMA. 2008 Dec 17;300(23):2715 [PMID: 19088343]
  8. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2008 Dec;35(3):107-15 [PMID: 18821063]
  9. Genome Res. 2009 May;19(5):804-14 [PMID: 19265028]
  10. Hypertension. 2007 Jan;49(1):96-106 [PMID: 17159089]
  11. Per Med. 2005 Mar;2(1):49-79 [PMID: 29793241]
  12. J Hum Genet. 2003;48(5):243-248 [PMID: 12768442]
  13. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Mar;16(3):635; author reply 635-6 [PMID: 17372270]
  14. Am Heart J. 2009 Nov;158(5):719-25 [PMID: 19853688]
  15. PLoS Genet. 2009 Jun;5(6):e1000505 [PMID: 19503599]
  16. Nat Rev Genet. 2005 Apr;6(4):333-40 [PMID: 15803201]
  17. Genet Epidemiol. 2009 Sep;33(6):508-17 [PMID: 19170134]
  18. Trends Genet. 2010 Mar;26(3):132-41 [PMID: 20106545]
  19. Osteoporos Int. 2010 Mar;21(3):467-77 [PMID: 19506792]
  20. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007 Apr;15(4):498-500 [PMID: 17245410]
  21. Cell Tissue Bank. 2008 Mar;9(1):55-65 [PMID: 17960495]
  22. Genet Epidemiol. 2009 May;33(4):290-8 [PMID: 19051284]
  23. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;590:403-18 [PMID: 19763518]
  24. Genet Epidemiol. 2009 Nov;33(7):637-45 [PMID: 19235185]
  25. Eur J Cancer. 2009 Sep;45(14):2562-8 [PMID: 19375306]
  26. J Orthop Res. 2008 Dec;26(12):1562-8 [PMID: 18634020]
  27. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1;34(Database issue):D617-21 [PMID: 16381944]
  28. Cell Tissue Bank. 2010 Aug;11(3):241-51 [PMID: 19672698]
  29. Genome Res. 2005 Nov;15(11):1592-3 [PMID: 16251469]
  30. Science. 2002 Dec 20;298(5602):2381-5 [PMID: 12493913]
  31. BMC Med Genomics. 2008 Jun 04;1:22 [PMID: 18533027]
  32. Vital Health Stat 1. 1994 Jul;(32):1-407 [PMID: 7975354]
  33. PLoS One. 2008 Jan 02;3(1):e1382 [PMID: 18196181]
  34. Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Jan 1;169(1):54-66 [PMID: 18936436]
  35. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 May 20;8:31 [PMID: 18492284]
  36. Nature. 2003 Dec 18;426(6968):789-96 [PMID: 14685227]
  37. Horm Metab Res. 2004 Apr;36(4):197-202 [PMID: 15114516]
  38. BMC Med Genomics. 2009 Apr 20;2:17 [PMID: 19379518]
  39. BMC Genet. 2007 Mar 14;8:7 [PMID: 17355643]

Grants

  1. 1UL1RR025011/NCRR NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Ethnicity
Gene Frequency
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Humans
Polymorphism, Genetic
Population Groups
Sex Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0allelefrequenciespopulationraceselfreporteddiseasepolymorphismsregionoriginassociatedbasedindividualsfrequencypopulationsdifferentrevealedgenderonedeterminedwithinPersonalizedMedicineResearchProjectsingleracial4%Caucasiansignificantly005StratificationdifferencesstudieswidePopulationBACKGROUND:lackknowledgeregardingattributableriskmanyremainsunknownFactorsaffectassociationeitherpositivelynegativelyethnicitymaypossibledeterminewithoutHereusedpanel51previouslyleastentirecohortcompareddbSNPdatasourcesstratifiedDifferencessexRESULTS:19544category1902797white11205573%female1120857%identifiable833774German41level19p=originsstratificationsignificantgendersCONCLUSIONS:representslargestdatealsogroupreportAsian/HmongAmericanIndiantwominoritygroupstypicallyselecteddetectionimportantdesignimplementationdeterminingrelevancepolymorphismgiven

Similar Articles

Cited By