Quality management for the collection of biological samples in multicentre studies.

J Peplies, A Fraterman, R Scott, P Russo, K Bammann
Author Information
  1. J Peplies: Bremen Institute for Prevention Research and Social Medicine, University of Bremen, Germany. peplies@bips.uni-bremen.de

Abstract

Large scale international multicentre studies require sophisticated quality management for the collection, processing and logistics of biological samples to ensure a maximum degree of standardisation across different environmental conditions and settings. This paper describes a quality management system for the collection of biological samples (QMS-BS) which was applied during IDEFICS, a large European multicentre study. The application was evaluated by several criteria like response rates for the different types of biological samples, measures of sample quality, compliance with the QMS-BS and efficiency of the document and sample control and of the quality assurance system. Response rates varied from 56.6% for venous blood collection to 90.1% for saliva collection. All sample types were associated with problems of sample quality (e.g. haemolysis of blood samples, lack of cooling for urine samples or desiccation of saliva samples). Overall compliance with the QMS-BS was good, with some exceptions mainly related to sample control. In conclusion the QMS-BS is a valuable tool for the management of biological sample collection in epidemiological multicentre studies.

References

  1. Clin Chem. 1995 Dec;41(12 Pt 2):1800-3 [PMID: 7497635]
  2. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005 Aug 7;206(2):261-8 [PMID: 15967217]
  3. Methods Inf Med. 2008;47(6):505-10 [PMID: 19057806]
  4. Am J Hum Biol. 2007 May-Jun;19(3):319-26 [PMID: 17421001]
  5. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2007 May-Jun;50(5-6):889-94 [PMID: 17514475]
  6. Neurosci Lett. 1994 Feb 14;167(1-2):191-4 [PMID: 8177523]
  7. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Nov;32 Suppl 5:S66-75 [PMID: 19011656]
  8. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2007 May-Jun;50(5-6):744-9 [PMID: 17514459]
  9. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2006 May;16(4):302-8 [PMID: 16679223]
  10. Clin Chem. 2002 Nov;48(11):1883-90 [PMID: 12406972]
  11. Mutat Res. 2003 Jun;543(3):217-34 [PMID: 12787814]
  12. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2008 Oct;33(9):1257-68 [PMID: 18691824]
  13. Cardiovasc J S Afr. 2005 Mar-Apr;16(2):112-7 [PMID: 15915279]
  14. Med Klin (Munich). 2007 Mar 15;102(3):230-5 [PMID: 17345019]
  15. Anal Biochem. 2004 Mar 15;326(2):267-72 [PMID: 15003567]

MeSH Term

Documentation
Humans
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Quality Control
Specimen Handling

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0samplescollectionsamplequalitybiologicalmulticentremanagementQMS-BSstudiesdifferentsystemratestypescompliancecontrolbloodsalivaLargescaleinternationalrequiresophisticatedprocessinglogisticsensuremaximumdegreestandardisationacrossenvironmentalconditionssettingspaperdescribesappliedIDEFICSlargeEuropeanstudyapplicationevaluatedseveralcriterialikeresponsemeasuresefficiencydocumentassuranceResponsevaried566%venous901%associatedproblemseghaemolysislackcoolingurinedesiccationOverallgoodexceptionsmainlyrelatedconclusionvaluabletoolepidemiologicalQuality

Similar Articles

Cited By