Auxiliary BE production by African American English-speaking children with and without specific language impairment.

April W Garrity, Janna B Oetting
Author Information
  1. April W Garrity: Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA. april.garrity@armstrong.edu

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine 3 forms (am, is, are) of auxiliary BE production by African American English (AAE)-speaking children with and without specific language impairment (SLI).
METHOD: Thirty AAE speakers participated: 10 six-year-olds with SLI, 10 age-matched controls, and 10 language-matched controls. BE production was examined through samples and a probe.
RESULTS: Across tasks, visual inspection suggested that the children with SLI overtly marked BE at lower rates than the controls, and all groups marked am at higher rates than is and are, with few dialect-inappropriate errors. Within the samples, the children also overtly marked is at higher rates when preceded by it/that/what than when it was preceded by a personal pronoun. A subset of these results was confirmed statistically. The children's marking of BE also varied across tasks; for the age-matched controls, this variation was tied to their AAE dialect densities.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings show across-dialect similarities and differences between children's acquisition of AAE and mainstream American English. Similarities involve the rate of the children's BE marking as a function of their clinical status and the nature of their dialect-inappropriate errors. Differences involve the children's rates of BE marking as a function of the form, context, and task.

References

  1. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Feb;49(1):16-26 [PMID: 16533070]
  2. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998 Dec;41(6):1432-43 [PMID: 9859896]
  3. Brain Lang. 2001 Jun;77(3):305-20 [PMID: 11386699]
  4. Clin Linguist Phon. 2008 Feb;22(2):111-25 [PMID: 18253870]
  5. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998 Dec;41(6):1412-31 [PMID: 9859895]
  6. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Feb;52(1):98-117 [PMID: 18723597]
  7. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001 Apr;44(2):416-33 [PMID: 11324662]
  8. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Jun;45(3):505-18 [PMID: 12069003]
  9. J Child Lang. 2003 Nov;30(4):769-95 [PMID: 14686084]
  10. J Speech Hear Res. 1996 Dec;39(6):1239-57 [PMID: 8959609]
  11. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2004 Jul;35(3):269-82 [PMID: 15248796]
  12. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Dec;47(6):1396-410 [PMID: 15842018]
  13. J Speech Hear Res. 1994 Feb;37(1):144-56 [PMID: 8170120]
  14. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Feb;40(1):62-74 [PMID: 9113859]
  15. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001 Aug;44(4):905-24 [PMID: 11521782]
  16. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Aug;40(4):809-20 [PMID: 9263945]
  17. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000 Aug;43(4):834-47 [PMID: 11386472]
  18. Appl Psycholinguist. 2008;29(4):689-722 [PMID: 18852844]
  19. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1998 Apr 1;29(2):96-108 [PMID: 27764431]
  20. J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Dec;36(6):1236-48 [PMID: 8114491]
  21. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Feb;52(1):2-15 [PMID: 18695014]
  22. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Dec;49(6):1238-56 [PMID: 17197493]
  23. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Jun;49(3):548-71 [PMID: 16787895]
  24. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001 Feb;44(1):207-23 [PMID: 11218104]
  25. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1992;57(4):1-182 [PMID: 1518508]
  26. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Aug;49(4):771-92 [PMID: 16908874]
  27. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000 Aug;43(4):848-64 [PMID: 11386473]
  28. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998 Oct;41(5):1115-24 [PMID: 9771633]
  29. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Jun;40(3):480-92 [PMID: 9210108]
  30. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000 Oct;43(5):1126-45 [PMID: 11063235]
  31. J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Dec;36(6):1249-57 [PMID: 8114492]

Grants

  1. R01 DC009811/NIDCD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Black or African American
Case-Control Studies
Child
Child Language
Child, Preschool
Female
Humans
Language Development Disorders
Male
Phonetics
Reference Values
Speech-Language Pathology
Vocabulary

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0BEAAEchildrencontrolsrateschildren'sproductionAmericanSLI10markedmarkingAfricanEnglishwithoutspecificlanguageimpairmentage-matchedsamplestasksovertlyhigherdialect-inappropriateerrorsalsoprecededinvolvefunctionPURPOSE:examine3formsauxiliary-speakingMETHOD:Thirtyspeakersparticipated:six-year-oldslanguage-matchedexaminedprobeRESULTS:AcrossvisualinspectionsuggestedlowergroupsWithinit/that/whatpersonalpronounsubsetresultsconfirmedstatisticallyvariedacrossvariationtieddialectdensitiesCONCLUSIONS:findingsshowacross-dialectsimilaritiesdifferencesacquisitionmainstreamSimilaritiesrateclinicalstatusnatureDifferencesformcontexttaskAuxiliaryEnglish-speaking

Similar Articles

Cited By