Socioeconomic inequalities in the use of outpatient services in Brazil according to health care need: evidence from the World Health Survey.

Célia L Szwarcwald, Paulo R B Souza-Júnior, Giseli N Damacena
Author Information
  1. Célia L Szwarcwald: Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. celials@icict.fiocruz.br

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Brazilian health system is founded on the principle of equity, meaning provision of equal care for equal needs. However, little is known about the impact of health policies in narrowing socioeconomic health inequalities. Using data from the Brazilian World Health Survey, this paper addresses socioeconomic inequalities in the use of outpatient services according to intensity of need.
METHODS: A three-stage cluster sampling was used to select 5000 adults (18 years and over). The non-response rate was 24.7% and calibration of the natural expansion factors was necessary to obtain the demographic structure of the Brazilian population. Utilization was established by use of outpatient services in the 12 months prior to the interview. Socioeconomic inequalities were analyzed by logistic regression models using years of schooling and private health insurance as independent variables, and controlling by age and sex. Effects of the socioeconomic variables on health services utilization were further analyzed according to self-rated health (good, fair and poor), considered as an indicator of intensity of health care need.
RESULTS: Among the 5000 respondents, 63.4% used an outpatient service in the year preceding the survey. The association of health services utilization and self-rated health was significant (p < 0.001). Regarding socioeconomic inequalities, the less educated used health services less frequently, despite presenting worse health conditions. Highly significant effects were found for both socioeconomic variables, years of schooling (p < 0.001) and private health insurance (p < 0.00), after controlling for age and sex. Stratifying by self-rated health, the effects of both socioeconomic variables were significant among those with good health status, but not statistically significant among those with poor self-rated health.
CONCLUSIONS: The analysis showed that the social gradient in outpatient services utilization decreases as the need is more intense. Among individuals with good self-rated health, possible explanations for the inequality are the lower use of preventive services and unequal supply of health services among the socially disadvantaged groups, or excessive use of health services by the wealthy. On the other hand, our results indicate an adequate performance of the Brazilian health system in narrowing socioeconomic inequalities in health in the most serious situations of need.

References

  1. Rev Saude Publica. 2005 Apr;39(2):277-84 [PMID: 15895149]
  2. Health Serv Res. 2003 Dec;38(6 Pt 2):1905-21 [PMID: 14727803]
  3. Lancet. 1971 Feb 27;1(7696):405-12 [PMID: 4100731]
  4. Soc Sci Med. 2002 Nov;55(9):1523-37 [PMID: 12297239]
  5. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(6):901-10 [PMID: 9080570]
  6. World Hosp Health Serv. 2003;39(1):11-4, 30, 32 [PMID: 12743882]
  7. JAMA. 1993 Jun 23-30;269(24):3140-5 [PMID: 8505817]
  8. Lancet. 2000 Sep 23;356(9235):1093-8 [PMID: 11009159]
  9. Lancet. 1997 Jun 7;349(9066):1655-9 [PMID: 9186383]
  10. Int J Health Serv. 1992;22(3):429-45 [PMID: 1644507]
  11. Int J Health Serv. 2001;31(3):545-66 [PMID: 11562005]
  12. Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Dec;82(12):940-6 [PMID: 15654409]
  13. Cad Saude Publica. 2003 May-Jun;19(3):745-57 [PMID: 12806478]
  14. Int J Health Serv. 2005;35(3):443-63 [PMID: 16119569]
  15. Soc Sci Med. 2004 Nov;59(10):2121-9 [PMID: 15351477]
  16. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Dec;54(12):923-9 [PMID: 11076989]
  17. Health Serv Res. 2003 Jun;38(3):831-65 [PMID: 12822915]
  18. Soc Sci Med. 2001 Nov;53(9):1149-62 [PMID: 11556606]
  19. Am J Public Health. 1997 Mar;87(3):365-70 [PMID: 9096535]
  20. Int J Equity Health. 2004 Oct 23;3(1):11 [PMID: 15500696]
  21. Int J Epidemiol. 1995 Apr;24(2):359-65 [PMID: 7635597]
  22. Am J Public Health. 2005 Apr;95(4):626-8 [PMID: 15798119]
  23. BMJ. 2005 Oct 15;331(7521):855-6 [PMID: 16223797]
  24. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Jul-Dec;Suppl Web Exclusives:W3-586-602 [PMID: 15506162]
  25. Int J Health Serv. 2001;31(3):647-58 [PMID: 11562011]
  26. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Jul;56(7):538-41 [PMID: 12080163]
  27. Cad Saude Publica. 2007 Oct;23(10):2490-502 [PMID: 17891308]
  28. Int J Health Serv. 1996;26(3):419-44 [PMID: 8840196]
  29. Cad Saude Publica. 2005;21 Suppl:54-64 [PMID: 16462997]
  30. Cad Saude Publica. 2005;21 Suppl:119-28 [PMID: 16463003]
  31. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Aug;58(8):655-8 [PMID: 15252067]
  32. Soc Sci Med. 2002 Jun;54(11):1621-35 [PMID: 12113445]
  33. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(1):1-2 [PMID: 10686728]
  34. Int J Health Serv. 1996;26(3):507-19 [PMID: 8840199]
  35. Cad Saude Publica. 2004;20 Suppl 2:S298-309 [PMID: 15608942]
  36. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:167-94 [PMID: 16533114]
  37. Rev Saude Publica. 2000 Dec;34(6 Suppl):19-25 [PMID: 11428196]
  38. J Ambul Care Manage. 2009 Jul-Sep;32(3):216-25 [PMID: 19542811]
  39. Soc Sci Med. 2005 Dec;61(12):2568-76 [PMID: 15963618]
  40. Cad Saude Publica. 2005;21 Suppl:78-88 [PMID: 16462999]
  41. Eur J Public Health. 2004 Dec;14(4):375-80 [PMID: 15542872]
  42. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2002 May-Jun;11(5-6):365-73 [PMID: 12162833]
  43. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2003 Apr-Jun;49(2):185-90 [PMID: 12886398]
  44. Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Dec;83(12):948-53 [PMID: 16462988]
  45. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(10):1246-55 [PMID: 11100619]
  46. Lancet. 2003 Oct 25;362(9393):1409-14 [PMID: 14585645]
  47. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(1):75-85 [PMID: 10686735]
  48. Soc Sci Med. 2000 Mar;50(5):641-9 [PMID: 10658845]
  49. Cad Saude Publica. 1999 Jul-Sep;15(3):487-96 [PMID: 10502144]
  50. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Apr;58(4):262-3 [PMID: 15026429]
  51. Lancet. 2005 Mar 5-11;365(9462):847-54 [PMID: 15752528]
  52. Cad Saude Publica. 2005;21 Suppl:89-99 [PMID: 16463000]
  53. Rev Saude Publica. 2004 Dec;38(6):764-72 [PMID: 15608893]
  54. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(6):723-45 [PMID: 9080558]
  55. Health Serv Res. 1996 Aug;31(3):347-63 [PMID: 8698589]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Ambulatory Care
Brazil
Female
Health Services Needs and Demand
Health Status
Health Surveys
Healthcare Disparities
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Logistic Models
Male
Sampling Studies
Socioeconomic Factors
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthservicessocioeconomicinequalitiesuseoutpatientself-ratedBrazilianneedvariablessignificantcareaccordingusedyearsutilizationgoodp<0amongsystemequalnarrowingWorldHealthSurveyintensity5000SocioeconomicanalyzedschoolingprivateinsurancecontrollingagesexpoorAmong001lesseffectsBACKGROUND:foundedprincipleequitymeaningprovisionneedsHoweverlittleknownimpactpoliciesUsingdatapaperaddressesMETHODS:three-stageclustersamplingselectadults18non-responserate247%calibrationnaturalexpansionfactorsnecessaryobtaindemographicstructurepopulationUtilizationestablished12monthspriorinterviewlogisticregressionmodelsusingindependentEffectsfairconsideredindicatorRESULTS:respondents634%serviceyearprecedingsurveyassociationRegardingeducatedfrequentlydespitepresentingworseconditionsHighlyfound00StratifyingstatusstatisticallyCONCLUSIONS:analysisshowedsocialgradientdecreasesintenseindividualspossibleexplanationsinequalitylowerpreventiveunequalsupplysociallydisadvantagedgroupsexcessivewealthyhandresultsindicateadequateperformanceserioussituationsBrazilneed:evidence

Similar Articles

Cited By