Technical and organizational considerations for the long-term maintenance and development of digital brain atlases and web-based databases.

Kei Ito
Author Information
  1. Kei Ito: Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, The University of Tokyo Tokyo, Japan.

Abstract

Digital brain atlas is a kind of image database that specifically provide information about neurons and glial cells in the brain. It has various advantages that are unmatched by conventional paper-based atlases. Such advantages, however, may become disadvantages if appropriate cares are not taken. Because digital atlases can provide unlimited amount of data, they should be designed to minimize redundancy and keep consistency of the records that may be added incrementally by different staffs. The fact that digital atlases can easily be revised necessitates a system to assure that users can access previous versions that might have been cited in papers at a particular period. To inherit our knowledge to our descendants, such databases should be maintained for a very long period, well over 100 years, like printed books and papers. Technical and organizational measures to enable long-term archive should be considered seriously. Compared to the initial development of the database, subsequent efforts to increase the quality and quantity of its contents are not regarded highly, because such tasks do not materialize in the form of publications. This fact strongly discourages continuous expansion of, and external contributions to, the digital atlases after its initial launch. To solve these problems, the role of the biocurators is vital. Appreciation of the scientific achievements of the people who do not write papers, and establishment of the secure academic career path for them, are indispensable for recruiting talents for this very important job.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Syst Neurosci. 2010 Apr 19;4:9 [PMID: 20428500]
  2. Front Syst Neurosci. 2010 Feb 12;4:5 [PMID: 20179785]
  3. Fly (Austin). 2009 Jan-Mar;3(1):112-4 [PMID: 19182544]
  4. J Comp Neurol. 2004;473:E1-E6 [PMID: 19626136]
  5. Nat Biotechnol. 2010 Apr;28(4):348-53 [PMID: 20231818]
  6. Neuron. 2009 Apr 16;62(1):17-29 [PMID: 19376064]
  7. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002 Oct;12(5):574-9 [PMID: 12367638]
  8. J Neurosci. 2007 Aug 29;27(35):9247-51 [PMID: 17728438]
  9. Front Syst Neurosci. 2010 Mar 03;4:3 [PMID: 20339482]
  10. Neuroimage. 2008 May 15;41(1):1-6 [PMID: 18358743]
  11. Curr Biol. 2002 Feb 5;12(3):227-31 [PMID: 11839276]
  12. Brains Minds Media. 2008;3:bmm1426 [PMID: 19129928]
  13. Cell Tissue Res. 2008 Jul;333(1):125-45 [PMID: 18504618]
  14. Nature. 2007 Jan 11;445(7124):168-76 [PMID: 17151600]
  15. Front Syst Neurosci. 2010 Mar 18;4:7 [PMID: 20339481]
  16. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Dec 29;7:544 [PMID: 17196102]
  17. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1996 Aug;194(2):187-203 [PMID: 8827327]
  18. Neurosci Res. 2009 May;64(1):128-31 [PMID: 19428691]
  19. Nat Methods. 2007 Apr;4(4):307-8 [PMID: 17396125]
  20. Neuroimage. 2009 Oct 1;47(4):1720-34 [PMID: 19371790]
  21. J Comp Neurol. 2009 Nov 10;517(2):210-25 [PMID: 19731336]
  22. Curr Biol. 2004 Mar 23;14(6):449-57 [PMID: 15043809]
  23. Neuroimage. 2009 Aug 15;47(2):549-63 [PMID: 19398022]
  24. Front Syst Neurosci. 2010 Feb 08;4:1 [PMID: 20204156]
  25. J Neurosci. 2007 Apr 4;27(14):3613-5 [PMID: 17409224]
  26. PLoS Comput Biol. 2005 Sep;1(4):e42 [PMID: 16201007]
  27. Neuroinformatics. 2009 Sep;7(3):161-3 [PMID: 19636973]
  28. Front Syst Neurosci. 2009 Oct 26;3:14 [PMID: 19949481]
  29. J Comp Neurol. 2004 May 31;473(3):377-414 [PMID: 15116397]
  30. J Comp Neurol. 2008 Jun 10;508(5):711-55 [PMID: 18395827]
  31. Front Syst Neurosci. 2010 Feb 22;3:17 [PMID: 20204142]
  32. Neuroscience. 2005;135(4):1203-15 [PMID: 16165303]
  33. Nature. 2008 Sep 4;455(7209):47-50 [PMID: 18769432]
  34. Neuroinformatics. 2008 Sep;6(3):241-52 [PMID: 18949582]
  35. Cell. 2007 Mar 23;128(6):1187-203 [PMID: 17382886]
  36. J Comp Neurol. 1999 Mar 22;405(4):543-52 [PMID: 10098944]
  37. Front Syst Neurosci. 2010 Feb 03;3:21 [PMID: 20161763]
  38. J Comp Neurol. 2005 Nov 7;492(1):1-19 [PMID: 16175557]
  39. Neuron. 1995 Jul;15(1):17-20 [PMID: 7619521]
  40. Anat Rec. 2001 Apr;265(2):37-53 [PMID: 11323769]
  41. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2009 Jun 13;367(1896):2387-97 [PMID: 19414461]
  42. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Feb;7(2):153-60 [PMID: 16429124]
  43. Science. 2000 Mar 24;287(5461):2185-95 [PMID: 10731132]
  44. J Comp Neurol. 2006 Aug 20;497(6):928-58 [PMID: 16802334]
  45. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2006 Apr;10(2):362-76 [PMID: 16617625]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0atlasesbraindigitaldatabasecanpapersatlasimageprovideadvantagesmayfactperioddatabasesTechnicalorganizationallong-terminitialdevelopmentDigitalkindspecificallyinformationneuronsglialcellsvariousunmatchedconventionalpaper-basedhoweverbecomedisadvantagesappropriatecarestakenunlimitedamountdatadesignedminimizeredundancykeepconsistencyrecordsaddedincrementallydifferentstaffseasilyrevisednecessitatessystemassureusersaccesspreviousversionsmightcitedparticularinheritknowledgedescendantsmaintainedlongwell100yearslikeprintedbooksmeasuresenablearchiveconsideredseriouslyComparedsubsequenteffortsincreasequalityquantitycontentsregardedhighlytasksmaterializeformpublicationsstronglydiscouragescontinuousexpansionexternalcontributionslaunchsolveproblemsrolebiocuratorsvitalAppreciationscientificachievementspeoplewriteestablishmentsecureacademiccareerpathindispensablerecruitingtalentsimportantjobconsiderationsmaintenanceweb-basedcuratormolecularmarkerneuron

Similar Articles

Cited By