How is human cooperation different?

Alicia P Melis, Dirk Semmann
Author Information
  1. Alicia P Melis: Department of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.

Abstract

Although cooperation is a widespread phenomenon in nature, human cooperation exceeds that of all other species with regard to the scale and range of cooperative activities. Here we review and discuss differences between humans and non-humans in the strategies employed to maintain cooperation and control free-riders. We distinguish forms of cooperative behaviour based on their influence on the immediate payoffs of actor and recipient. If the actor has immediate costs and only the recipient obtains immediate benefits, we term this investment. If the behaviour has immediate positive effects for both actor and recipient, we call this a self-serving mutually beneficial behaviour or mutual cooperation. We argue that humans, in contrast to all other species, employ a wider range of enforcement mechanisms, which allow higher levels of cooperation to evolve and stabilize among unrelated individuals and in large groups. We also discuss proximate mechanisms underlying cooperative behaviour and focus on our experimental work with humans and our closest primate relatives. Differences in the proximate mechanisms also seem to contribute to explaining humans' greater ability to cooperate and enforce cooperation.

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Mar 18;100(6):3531-5 [PMID: 12631700]
  2. Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Nov 7;275(1650):2529-36 [PMID: 18664435]
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jan 11;102(2):390-5 [PMID: 15630098]
  4. Ecol Lett. 2010 Jan;13(1):45-50 [PMID: 19840082]
  5. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 12;365(1553):2687-97 [PMID: 20679112]
  6. Nature. 2009 Nov 5;462(7269):51-7 [PMID: 19890322]
  7. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Nov 12;364(1533):3143-55 [PMID: 19805423]
  8. J Comp Psychol. 2009 Aug;123(3):242-9 [PMID: 19685965]
  9. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1989 Apr;78(4):547-73 [PMID: 2540662]
  10. Curr Biol. 2007 Aug 21;17(16):R661-72 [PMID: 17714660]
  11. J Comp Psychol. 2007 Aug;121(3):241-9 [PMID: 17696650]
  12. Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Jan 22;272(1559):135-40 [PMID: 15695203]
  13. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 12;365(1553):2699-710 [PMID: 20679113]
  14. J Theor Biol. 2000 Sep 21;206(2):169-79 [PMID: 10966755]
  15. J Evol Biol. 2008 Mar;21(2):405-20 [PMID: 18179515]
  16. Science. 1999 Apr 9;284(5412):278-82 [PMID: 10195886]
  17. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Apr 7;268(1468):745-53 [PMID: 11321064]
  18. J Theor Biol. 2002 Sep 21;218(2):187-94 [PMID: 12381291]
  19. J Comp Psychol. 2005 Aug;119(3):335-42 [PMID: 16131262]
  20. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 30;104(44):17435-40 [PMID: 17947384]
  21. Nature. 2002 Jan 10;415(6868):137-40 [PMID: 11805825]
  22. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Nov 12;364(1533):3255-66 [PMID: 19805432]
  23. Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 22;276(1657):699-706 [PMID: 18957365]
  24. Primates. 2006 Jan;47(1):6-13 [PMID: 16283424]
  25. Behav Processes. 2008 May;78(1):108-11 [PMID: 18068313]
  26. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Oct 22;269(1505):2087-93 [PMID: 12396482]
  27. Nature. 2006 Jun 22;441(7096):975-8 [PMID: 16791194]
  28. Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Jun 22;275(1641):1421-9 [PMID: 18364318]
  29. Anim Cogn. 2009 Jul;12(4):587-97 [PMID: 19259709]
  30. J Theor Biol. 2003 Jul 21;223(2):135-47 [PMID: 12814597]
  31. Nature. 2003 Sep 25;425(6956):390-3 [PMID: 14508487]
  32. Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Dec 7;274(1628):2965-70 [PMID: 17895227]
  33. Anim Cogn. 2008 Jan;11(1):109-16 [PMID: 17549530]
  34. J Theor Biol. 2003 Sep 7;224(1):115-26 [PMID: 12900209]
  35. PLoS Biol. 2006 Dec;4(12):e431 [PMID: 17147471]
  36. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 12;365(1553):2651-61 [PMID: 20679109]
  37. Science. 1981 Mar 27;211(4489):1390-6 [PMID: 7466396]
  38. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 May 7;269(1494):881-3 [PMID: 12028769]
  39. Nature. 1998 Jun 11;393(6685):573-7 [PMID: 9634232]
  40. Science. 2006 Mar 3;311(5765):1297-300 [PMID: 16513985]
  41. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 12;365(1553):2675-86 [PMID: 20679111]
  42. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Apr 22;269(1493):773-80 [PMID: 11958708]
  43. Emotion. 2009 Jun;9(3):430-4 [PMID: 19485620]
  44. Q Rev Biol. 2007 Dec;82(4):327-48 [PMID: 18217526]
  45. Science. 2001 Jan 19;291(5503):478-81 [PMID: 11161200]
  46. Anim Behav. 2005 Jan;69(1):133-142 [PMID: 16804561]
  47. Science. 2006 Apr 7;312(5770):108-11 [PMID: 16601192]
  48. Nature. 2005 Sep 22;437(7058):E8; discussion E8-9 [PMID: 16177738]
  49. Proc Biol Sci. 2011 May 7;278(1710):1405-13 [PMID: 20980301]
  50. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jan 22;268(1463):187-96 [PMID: 11209890]
  51. Behav Brain Sci. 2005 Oct;28(5):675-91; discussion 691-735 [PMID: 16262930]
  52. J Comp Psychol. 2000 Sep;114(3):297-301 [PMID: 10994846]
  53. Curr Biol. 2006 Jul 11;16(13):R482-3 [PMID: 16824903]
  54. Anim Behav. 2000 Oct;60(4):523-529 [PMID: 11032655]
  55. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 12;365(1553):2711-22 [PMID: 20679114]
  56. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Feb;8(2):60-5 [PMID: 15588809]
  57. Child Dev. 1990 Aug;61(4):1164-74 [PMID: 2209186]
  58. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 12;365(1553):2619-26 [PMID: 20679106]
  59. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 12;365(1553):2635-50 [PMID: 20679108]
  60. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 8;104(19):7786-90 [PMID: 17456600]
  61. Science. 2006 Mar 3;311(5765):1301-3 [PMID: 16513986]
  62. Science. 2010 Jan 8;327(5962):171 [PMID: 20056883]
  63. Science. 1988 Mar 25;239(4847):1525-7 [PMID: 17772751]
  64. BMC Biol. 2008 May 14;6:20 [PMID: 18479522]
  65. Science. 2003 Jan 3;299(5603):56-7 [PMID: 12511635]
  66. J Comp Psychol. 2006 Feb;120(1):74-5 [PMID: 16551167]
  67. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Dec 15;89(24):12137-9 [PMID: 1465451]
  68. PLoS One. 2009 Oct 14;4(10):e7416 [PMID: 19826478]
  69. PLoS Biol. 2007 Jul;5(7):e184 [PMID: 17594177]
  70. Nature. 1995 Jan 19;373(6511):209-16 [PMID: 7816134]
  71. Dev Sci. 2004 Sep;7(4):488-98 [PMID: 15484596]
  72. Curr Biol. 2007 Oct 9;17(19):1663-8 [PMID: 17900899]
  73. Nature. 2006 Dec 7;444(7120):718-23 [PMID: 17151660]
  74. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Aug 21;104(34):13537-8 [PMID: 17699626]
  75. Science. 2001 Sep 28;293(5539):2446-9 [PMID: 11577235]
  76. J Theor Biol. 2009 Jan 7;256(1):45-57 [PMID: 18938180]
  77. Primates. 2007 Jan;48(1):13-21 [PMID: 17103081]
  78. J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):17-52 [PMID: 5875340]
  79. Science. 1995 Sep 1;269(5228):1260-2 [PMID: 7652573]
  80. Nature. 2005 Oct 27;437(7063):1291-8 [PMID: 16251955]
  81. Curr Biol. 2007 Apr 3;17(7):619-23 [PMID: 17346970]
  82. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Dec 7;268(1484):2495-501 [PMID: 11747570]
  83. Science. 1968 Dec 13;162(3859):1243-8 [PMID: 5699198]
  84. Nature. 2003 Sep 4;425(6953):75-8 [PMID: 12955143]
  85. Nature. 2008 Mar 20;452(7185):348-51 [PMID: 18354481]
  86. Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Sep 22;272(1575):1865-75 [PMID: 16191591]
  87. Nature. 2002 Jan 24;415(6870):424-6 [PMID: 11807552]
  88. Child Dev. 2006 May-Jun;77(3):640-63 [PMID: 16686793]
  89. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 May 10;102(19):7047-9 [PMID: 15857950]
  90. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(2):221-8 [PMID: 12459220]

MeSH Term

Altruism
Animals
Cooperative Behavior
Game Theory
Humans
Pan troglodytes

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cooperationbehaviourimmediatecooperativehumansactorrecipientmechanismshumanspeciesrangediscussalsoproximateAlthoughwidespreadphenomenonnatureexceedsregardscaleactivitiesreviewdifferencesnon-humansstrategiesemployedmaintaincontrolfree-ridersdistinguishformsbasedinfluencepayoffscostsobtainsbenefitsterminvestmentpositiveeffectscallself-servingmutuallybeneficialmutualarguecontrastemploywiderenforcementallowhigherlevelsevolvestabilizeamongunrelatedindividualslargegroupsunderlyingfocusexperimentalworkclosestprimaterelativesDifferencesseemcontributeexplaininghumans'greaterabilitycooperateenforcedifferent?

Similar Articles

Cited By