Hospital admissions for asthma, diabetes and COPD: is there an association with practice nurse staffing? A cross sectional study using routinely collected data.

Peter Griffiths, Trevor Murrells, Dalia Dawoud, Simon Jones
Author Information
  1. Peter Griffiths: King's College London, National Nursing Research Unit, 57 Waterloo Road, London, UK. peter.griffiths@kcl.ac.uk

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Delivering good quality primary care for patients with chronic conditions has the potential to reduce non-elective hospital admissions. Practice nurse staffing levels in England have been linked to attainment of general practice performance targets for some chronic conditions. The aim of this study was to examine whether practice nurse staffing level is similarly associated with non-elective hospital admissions in three clinical areas: asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and diabetes.
METHODS: This observational study used cross sectional analysis of routinely collected data. Hospital admissions data for the period 2005-2006 (for asthma, COPD and diabetes) were linked with a database of practice characteristics, nurse staffing data and data on population characteristics for the same period. Statistical modelling explored the relationship between non-elective hospital admission rates for the three conditions and the list size per full time equivalent (FTE) practice nurse.
RESULTS: Higher practice nurse staffing levels were significantly associated with lower rates of admission for asthma (p < 0.001) and COPD (p < 0.001). A similar association was seen for patients with two or more admissions (p < 0.05 for asthma and p < 0.001 for COPD). For diabetes, higher practice nurse staffing level was significantly associated with higher admission rates (p < 0.05), but this association was not significant in case of patients with two or more admissions. Across all models, increasing deprivation was associated with higher admission rates for all conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: The inconsistent relationship between nurse staffing and patient outcomes across the different conditions and the fact that for diabetes the relationship between staffing and outcomes was in a different direction from the association between staffing and care quality, highlights the need to avoid making a simple causal interpretation of these findings and reduces the possible confidence in such conclusions. There is a need for more research into the organisation and delivery of diabetes care services in general practice, preferably using patient level data; in order to better understand the impact of the different staffing configurations on patient outcomes.

References

  1. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec 01;5:76 [PMID: 16321155]
  2. Health Serv Res. 2004 Apr;39(2):345-61 [PMID: 15032958]
  3. N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 30;351(14):1448-54 [PMID: 15459308]
  4. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 27;355(4):375-84 [PMID: 16870916]
  5. J Health Organ Manag. 2006;20(6):525-36 [PMID: 17168104]
  6. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct 17;7:166 [PMID: 17941984]
  7. BMJ. 1999 Jul 10;319(7202):94-8 [PMID: 10398635]
  8. Lancet. 2010 Feb 6;375(9713):481-9 [PMID: 20110121]
  9. J Ambul Care Manage. 2008 Jul-Sep;31(3):226-38 [PMID: 18574381]
  10. BMC Fam Pract. 2006 Nov 13;7:68 [PMID: 17096861]
  11. BMJ. 1999 Jul 10;319(7202):98-103 [PMID: 10398636]
  12. Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Jan;60(570):36-48 [PMID: 20040166]
  13. Hum Resour Health. 2009 Dec 19;7:87 [PMID: 20021682]
  14. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Feb;23(2):135-41 [PMID: 17924171]
  15. J R Soc Med. 2006 Feb;99(2):81-9 [PMID: 16449782]
  16. Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Aug;56(529):624-6 [PMID: 16882382]

Grants

  1. /Department of Health

MeSH Term

Asthma
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diabetes Mellitus
Female
Hospitalization
Humans
Male
Needs Assessment
Nurse Practitioners
Nursing Staff
Patient Admission
Personnel Staffing and Scheduling
Primary Health Care
Professional Competence
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Quality Indicators, Health Care
Registries
Risk Assessment
Severity of Illness Index
United Kingdom

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0staffingnursepracticeadmissionsdiabetesdataconditionsasthmap<0associatedCOPDadmissionratesassociationcarepatientsnon-electivehospitalstudylevelrelationship001higherpatientoutcomesdifferentqualitychroniclevelslinkedgeneralthreecrosssectionalroutinelycollectedHospitalperiodcharacteristicssignificantlytwo05needusingBACKGROUND:DeliveringgoodprimarypotentialreducePracticeEnglandattainmentperformancetargetsaimexaminewhethersimilarlyclinicalareas:ChronicObstructivePulmonaryDiseaseMETHODS:observationalusedanalysis2005-2006databasepopulationStatisticalmodellingexploredlistsizeperfulltimeequivalentFTERESULTS:HigherlowersimilarseensignificantcaseAcrossmodelsincreasingdeprivationCONCLUSIONS:inconsistentacrossfactdirectionhighlightsavoidmakingsimplecausalinterpretationfindingsreducespossibleconfidenceconclusionsresearchorganisationdeliveryservicespreferablyorderbetterunderstandimpactconfigurationsCOPD:staffing?

Similar Articles

Cited By