How can we improve outcomes for patients and families under palliative care? Implementing clinical audit for quality improvement in resource limited settings.

Lucy Selman, Richard Harding
Author Information
  1. Lucy Selman: King's College London, Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, Bessemer Road, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9PJ, UK.

Abstract

Palliative care in India has made enormous advances in providing better care for patients and families living with progressive disease, and many clinical services are well placed to begin quality improvement initiatives, including clinical audit. Clinical audit is recognized globally to be essential in all healthcare, as a way of monitoring and improving quality of care. However, it is not common in developing country settings, including India. Clinical audit is a cyclical activity involving: identification of areas of care in need of improvement, through data collection and analysis utilizing an appropriate questionnaire; setting measurable quality of care targets in specific areas; designing and implementing service improvement strategies; and then re-evaluating quality of care to assess progress towards meeting the targets. Outcome measurement is an important component of clinical audit that has additional advantages; for example, establishing an evidence base for the effectiveness of services. In resource limited contexts, outcome measurement in clinical audit is particularly important as it enables service development to be evidence-based and ensures resources are allocated effectively. Key success factors in conducting clinical audit are identified (shared ownership, training, managerial support, inclusion of all members of staff and a positive approach). The choice of outcome measurement tool is discussed, including the need for a culturally appropriate and validated measure which is brief and simple enough to incorporate into clinical practice and reflects the holistic nature of palliative care. Support for clinical audit is needed at a national level, and development and validation of an outcome measurement tool in the Indian context is a crucial next step.

Keywords

References

  1. BMJ. 2003 Apr 12;326(7393):816-9 [PMID: 12689983]
  2. Lancet. 2005 Jun 4-10;365(9475):1909-11 [PMID: 15936406]
  3. Eur J Cancer. 2007 Aug;43(12):1810-20 [PMID: 17689070]
  4. Palliat Med. 2007 Mar;21(2):87-93 [PMID: 17344256]
  5. Qual Health Care. 2000 Mar;9(1):23-36 [PMID: 10848367]
  6. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003 Mar;25(3):202-12 [PMID: 12614955]
  7. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2000 Oct;6(9):443-7 [PMID: 12388896]
  8. Palliat Med. 2001 Sep;15(5):363-71 [PMID: 11591087]
  9. Qual Health Care. 1999 Dec;8(4):219-27 [PMID: 10847883]
  10. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2002 Nov-Dec;19(6):397-402 [PMID: 12442975]
  11. J Palliat Care. 2006 Autumn;22(3):158-65 [PMID: 17058754]
  12. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Jan 9;166(1):101-5 [PMID: 16401817]
  13. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Jan 25;8:10 [PMID: 20100332]
  14. Ann Behav Med. 2002 Winter;24(1):49-58 [PMID: 12008794]
  15. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2007;21(1):31-3 [PMID: 17430827]
  16. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Feb;33(2):229-32 [PMID: 17280929]
  17. J Palliat Care. 1999 Summer;15(2):5-12 [PMID: 10425872]
  18. Cancer. 2009 Sep 1;115(17):3820-9 [PMID: 19514090]
  19. Cancer Nurs. 1992 Jun;15(3):182-90 [PMID: 1611603]
  20. Psychiatry Res. 1995 Nov 29;59(1-2):65-79 [PMID: 8771222]
  21. Palliat Med. 1995 Apr;9(2):123-37 [PMID: 7541683]
  22. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Nov 29;2:68 [PMID: 15566627]
  23. Palliat Med. 1995 Jul;9(3):207-19 [PMID: 7582177]
  24. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 1996 Dec;5(4):233-6 [PMID: 9117067]
  25. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1993 Apr;8(3):132-9 [PMID: 8326163]
  26. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Jul;38(1):145-156 [PMID: 19615636]
  27. Palliat Med. 1997 Jan;11(1):3-20 [PMID: 9068681]
  28. Psychosom Med. 1979 May;41(3):209-18 [PMID: 472086]
  29. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42 [PMID: 17161752]
  30. Palliat Med. 2002 Nov;16(6):546-7 [PMID: 12465706]
  31. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2003;17(3-4):171-82; discussion 183-4 [PMID: 15022960]
  32. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1996 Dec;12(6):360-3 [PMID: 8973045]
  33. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2004 Mar;10(3):119-22 [PMID: 15126954]
  34. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Dec;38(6):903-12 [PMID: 19775860]
  35. Palliat Med. 1998 Sep;12(5):317-32 [PMID: 9924595]
  36. JAMA. 1988 Sep 23-30;260(12):1743-8 [PMID: 3045356]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0careclinicalauditqualityimprovementmeasurementincludingoutcomeIndiapatientsfamiliesservicesClinicalsettingsareasneedappropriatetargetsserviceimportantresourcelimiteddevelopmenttoolpalliativeQualityPalliativemadeenormousadvancesprovidingbetterlivingprogressivediseasemanywellplacedbegininitiativesrecognizedgloballyessentialhealthcarewaymonitoringimprovingHowevercommondevelopingcountrycyclicalactivityinvolving:identificationdatacollectionanalysisutilizingquestionnairesettingmeasurablespecificdesigningimplementingstrategiesre-evaluatingassessprogresstowardsmeetingOutcomecomponentadditionaladvantagesexampleestablishingevidencebaseeffectivenesscontextsparticularlyenablesevidence-basedensuresresourcesallocatedeffectivelyKeysuccessfactorsconductingidentifiedsharedownershiptrainingmanagerialsupportinclusionmembersstaffpositiveapproachchoicediscussedculturallyvalidatedmeasurebriefsimpleenoughincorporatepracticereflectsholisticnatureSupportneedednationallevelvalidationIndiancontextcrucialnextstepcanimproveoutcomescare?ImplementingAuditOutcomes

Similar Articles

Cited By