Effects of electrical stimulation of dorsal raphe nucleus on neuronal response properties of barrel cortex layer IV neurons following long-term sensory deprivation.

Hamid Sheikhkanloui-Milan, Vahid Sheibani, Mohammadreza Afarinesh, Saeed Esmaeili-Mahani, Ali Shamsizadeh, Golamreza Sepehri
Author Information
  1. Hamid Sheikhkanloui-Milan: Neuroscience Research Center and Department of Physiology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman 76198-13159, Iran.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of electrical stimulation of dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) on response properties of layer IV barrel cortex neurons following long-term sensory deprivation.
METHODS: Male Wistar rats were divided into sensory-deprived (SD) and control (unplucked) groups. In SD group, all vibrissae except the D2 vibrissa were plucked on postnatal day one, and kept plucked for a period of 60 d. After that, whisker regrowth was allowed for 8-10 d. The D2 principal whisker (PW) and the D1 adjacent whisker (AW) were either deflected singly or both deflected in a serial order that the AW was deflected 20 ms before PW deflection for assessing lateral inhibition, and neuronal responses were recorded from layer IV of the D2 barrel cortex. DRN was electrically stimulated at inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) ranging from 0 to 800 ms before whisker deflection.
RESULTS: PW-evoked responses increased in the SD group with DRN electrical stimulation at ISIs of 50 ms and 100 ms, whereas AW-evoked responses increased at ISI of 800 ms in both groups. Whisker plucking before DRN stimulation could enhance the responsiveness of barrel cortex neurons to PW deflection and decrease the responsiveness to AW deflection. DRN electrical stimulation significantly reduced this difference only in PW-evoked responses between groups. Besides, no DRN stimulation-related changes in response latency were observed following PW or AW deflection in either group. Moreover, condition test (CT) ratio increased in SD rats, while DRN stimulation did not affect the CT ratio in either group. There was no obvious change in 5-HT(2A) receptor protein density in barrel cortex between SD and control groups.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that DRN electrical stimulation can modulate information processing in the SD barrel cortex.

References

  1. Somatosens Mot Res. 1998;15(2):146-56 [PMID: 9730115]
  2. Science. 1973 Jan 26;179(4071):395-8 [PMID: 4682966]
  3. Neuroscience. 2002;111(4):799-814 [PMID: 12031405]
  4. J Neurophysiol. 1989 Feb;61(2):311-30 [PMID: 2918357]
  5. J Comp Neurol. 1998 Jun 1;395(2):209-16 [PMID: 9603373]
  6. Brain Res Bull. 2006 Feb 15;68(6):430-5 [PMID: 16459198]
  7. J Neurosci. 2003 Jan 1;23(1):358-66 [PMID: 12514235]
  8. Neuron. 1999 Nov;24(3):623-37 [PMID: 10595514]
  9. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 1993;53(2):415-9 [PMID: 8213269]
  10. Biocell. 2002 Aug;26(2):247-52 [PMID: 12240559]
  11. J Neurosci. 1992 May;12(5):1826-38 [PMID: 1578273]
  12. Brain Res Bull. 1982 Apr;8(4):389-430 [PMID: 6178481]
  13. Brain Res. 1988 Jun 21;453(1-2):315-28 [PMID: 3401769]
  14. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 1998 Apr 17;107(1):159-63 [PMID: 9602106]
  15. Cereb Cortex. 1999 Apr-May;9(3):249-56 [PMID: 10355905]
  16. Neuroscience. 2002;111(4):815-35 [PMID: 12031406]
  17. Neuropharmacology. 1999 Aug;38(8):1083-152 [PMID: 10462127]
  18. Neuroscience. 1991;40(2):399-412 [PMID: 1851255]
  19. Brain Res. 1983 Dec 19;289(1-2):109-19 [PMID: 6140982]
  20. Neuron. 1996 Feb;16(2):297-307 [PMID: 8789945]
  21. Nature. 1987 Apr 16-22;326(6114):694-7 [PMID: 3561512]
  22. Brain Res Bull. 2007 Sep 14;74(1-3):29-36 [PMID: 17683786]
  23. Brain Res. 1979 Jul 27;171(1):11-28 [PMID: 223730]
  24. Neuroscience. 1993 Jun;54(3):701-17 [PMID: 8332257]

MeSH Term

Animals
Denervation
Electric Stimulation
Male
Neuronal Plasticity
Neurons
Raphe Nuclei
Rats
Rats, Wistar
Reaction Time
Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2A
Sensory Deprivation
Somatosensory Cortex
Time Factors

Chemicals

Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2A

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0DRNstimulationbarrelcortexSDelectricalmsdeflectiongroupsgroupwhiskerPWAWresponsesresponselayerIVneuronsfollowingD2eitherdeflectedincreaseddorsalraphenucleuspropertieslong-termsensorydeprivationratscontrolpluckeddneuronalISIs800PW-evokedresponsivenessCTratioOBJECTIVE:evaluateeffectMETHODS:MaleWistardividedsensory-deprivedunpluckedvibrissaeexceptvibrissapostnataldayonekeptperiod60regrowthallowed8-10principalD1adjacentsinglyserialorder20assessinglateralinhibitionrecordedelectricallystimulatedinter-stimulusintervalsranging0RESULTS:50100whereasAW-evokedISIWhiskerpluckingenhancedecreasesignificantlyreduceddifferenceBesidesstimulation-relatedchangeslatencyobservedMoreoverconditiontestaffectobviouschange5-HT2AreceptorproteindensityCONCLUSION:resultssuggestcanmodulateinformationprocessingEffects

Similar Articles

Cited By