Delay discounting of qualitatively different reinforcers in rats.

Amanda L Calvert, Leonard Green, Joel Myerson
Author Information
  1. Amanda L Calvert: Washington University, Department of Psychology, Campus Box1125, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA.

Abstract

Humans discount larger delayed rewards less steeply than smaller rewards, whereas no such magnitude effect has been observed in rats (and pigeons). It remains possible that rats' discounting is sensitive to differences in the quality of the delayed reinforcer even though it is not sensitive to amount. To evaluate this possibility, Experiment 1 examined discounting of qualitatively different food reinforcers: highly preferred versus nonpreferred food pellets. Similarly, Experiment 2 examined discounting of highly preferred versus nonpreferred liquid reinforcers. In both experiments, an adjusting-amount procedure was used to determine the amount of immediate reinforcer that was judged to be of equal subjective value to the delayed reinforcer. The amount and quality of the delayed reinforcer were varied across conditions. Discounting was well described by a hyperbolic function, but no systematic effects of the quantity or the quality of the delayed reinforcer were observed.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychol Sci. 2007 Jan;18(1):58-63 [PMID: 17362379]
  2. Behav Processes. 2003 Oct 31;64(3):261-271 [PMID: 14580697]
  3. J Exp Anal Behav. 2004 Jan;81(1):39-50 [PMID: 15113132]
  4. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Sep;76(2):235-43 [PMID: 11599641]
  5. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Dec;16(6):1071-5 [PMID: 19966257]
  6. Psychol Bull. 2004 Sep;130(5):769-92 [PMID: 15367080]
  7. Mem Cognit. 1997 Sep;25(5):715-23 [PMID: 9337589]
  8. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 May;35(3):271-82 [PMID: 16812216]
  9. J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Mar;77(2):129-46 [PMID: 11936247]
  10. J Abnorm Psychol. 2003 Aug;112(3):382-92 [PMID: 12943017]
  11. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Aug;12(4):732-9 [PMID: 16447389]
  12. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1954 Jun;47(3):235-9 [PMID: 13163261]
  13. Behav Processes. 2009 Oct;82(2):214-8 [PMID: 19540317]
  14. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 May;67(3):353-66 [PMID: 9163939]
  15. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Mar;15(2):249-51 [PMID: 16811511]
  16. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 May;22(3):771-91 [PMID: 8656156]
  17. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2002 Sep;163(2):174-82 [PMID: 12202964]
  18. Psychol Bull. 1978 Nov;85(6):1177-98 [PMID: 366648]
  19. J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Nov;64(3):263-76 [PMID: 16812772]
  20. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Nov;26(3):335-47 [PMID: 16811952]

Grants

  1. R01 MH055308/NIMH NIH HHS
  2. MH055308/NIMH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Choice Behavior
Drinking
Food
Food Preferences
Male
Models, Psychological
Neuropsychological Tests
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Reinforcement Schedule

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0reinforcerdelayeddiscountingqualityamountrewardsmagnitudeeffectobservedratssensitiveExperimentexaminedqualitativelydifferentfoodhighlypreferredversusnonpreferredreinforcersHumansdiscountlargerlesssteeplysmallerwhereaspigeonsremainspossiblerats'differenceseventhoughevaluatepossibility1reinforcers:pelletsSimilarly2liquidexperimentsadjusting-amountprocedureuseddetermineimmediatejudgedequalsubjectivevaluevariedacrossconditionsDiscountingwelldescribedhyperbolicfunctionsystematiceffectsquantityDelaybehavioraleconomicschoicedelayleverpressrat

Similar Articles

Cited By