Temporal isolation effects in recognition and serial recall.

Caroline Morin, Gordon D A Brown, Stephan Lewandowsky
Author Information
  1. Caroline Morin: Department of Informatics and Sensors, Cranfield University, SShrivenham, windon, England. c.morin@cranfield.ac.uk

Abstract

Recent temporal distinctiveness models of memory predict that temporally isolated items will be recalled better than temporally crowded items. The effect has been found in some tasks (free recall, memory for serial order when report order is unconstrained, running memory span) but not in others (forward serial recall). Such results suggest that the attentional weighting given to a temporal dimension in memory may vary with task demands. Here, we find robust temporal isolation effects in recognition memory (Experiment 1) and a smaller isolation effect in forward serial recall when an open pool of items is used (Experiment 2). Analysis of 26 temporal isolation effects suggests that the phenomenon occurs in a range of tasks but is larger when it is useful to attend to a temporal dimension in memory. The overall pattern of results is taken to favor memory models that rely on multiple weighted dimensions in memory, one of which is temporal.

References

  1. Memory. 2005 Apr-May;13(3-4):283-92 [PMID: 15948613]
  2. Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Mar;9(1):59-79 [PMID: 12026954]
  3. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990 Mar;16(2):316-27 [PMID: 2137870]
  4. Psychol Rev. 2007 Jul;114(3):539-76 [PMID: 17638496]
  5. Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Aug;13(4):717-23 [PMID: 17201375]
  6. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jan;34(1):128-45 [PMID: 18194059]
  7. Memory. 2006 May;14(4):424-36 [PMID: 16766446]
  8. Mem Cognit. 1993 Sep;21(5):689-98 [PMID: 8412719]
  9. Mem Cognit. 2006 Sep;34(6):1368-75 [PMID: 17225515]
  10. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Oct;11(5):771-90 [PMID: 15732687]
  11. Mem Cognit. 2007 Oct;35(7):1724-34 [PMID: 18062549]
  12. Psychol Rev. 2004 Apr;111(2):524-42 [PMID: 15065921]
  13. Psychol Rev. 2000 Jan;107(1):127-81 [PMID: 10687405]
  14. Psychol Rev. 2008 Jul;115(3):544-76 [PMID: 18729591]
  15. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 Mar;21(2):436-48 [PMID: 7738509]
  16. Psychol Rev. 2007 Jan;114(1):152-76 [PMID: 17227185]
  17. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Dec;12(6):999-1004 [PMID: 16615319]
  18. Mem Cognit. 2010 Jan;38(1):83-91 [PMID: 19966241]
  19. J Exp Psychol. 1966 Mar;71(3):461-5 [PMID: 5908831]
  20. Memory. 1996 May;4(3):225-42 [PMID: 8735609]
  21. Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Jun;13(3):458-65 [PMID: 17048731]
  22. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 May;33(3):570-85 [PMID: 17470006]
  23. Psychol Rev. 1998 Oct;105(4):761-81 [PMID: 9830378]
  24. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Sep;36(5):1207-41 [PMID: 20804293]
  25. Mem Cognit. 2008 Jul;36(5):957-67 [PMID: 18630202]
  26. Mem Cognit. 2009 Mar;37(2):181-93 [PMID: 19223568]
  27. Can J Psychol. 1966 Jun;20(2):218-27 [PMID: 5942326]

MeSH Term

Humans
Mental Recall
Models, Psychological
Time Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0memorytemporalrecallserialisolationitemseffectsmodelstemporallyeffecttasksorderforwardresultsdimensionrecognitionExperimentRecentdistinctivenesspredictisolatedwillrecalledbettercrowdedfoundfreereportunconstrainedrunningspanotherssuggestattentionalweightinggivenmayvarytaskdemandsfindrobust1smalleropenpoolused2Analysis26suggestsphenomenonoccursrangelargerusefulattendoverallpatterntakenfavorrelymultipleweighteddimensionsoneTemporal

Similar Articles

Cited By