Phonological working memory impairments in children with specific language impairment: where does the problem lie?

Mary Alt
Author Information
  1. Mary Alt: University of Arizona, Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, 1131 E. 2nd St., Tucson, AZ 85721, USA. malt@email.arizona.edu

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine which factors contribute to the lexical learning deficits of children with specific language impairment (SLI).
METHOD: Participants included 40 7-8-year old participants, half of whom were diagnosed with SLI and half of whom had normal language skills. We tested hypotheses about the contributions to word learning of the initial encoding of phonological information and the link to long-term memory. Children took part in a computer-based fast-mapping task which manipulated word length and phonotactic probability to address the hypotheses. The task had a recognition and a production component. Data were analyzed using mixed ANOVAs with post-hoc testing.
RESULTS: Results indicate that the main problem for children with SLI is with initial encoding, with implications for limited capacity. There was not strong evidence for specific deficits in the link to long-term memory.
CONCLUSIONS: We were able to ascertain which aspects of lexical learning are most problematic for children with SLI in terms of fast-mapping. These findings may allow clinicians to focus intervention on known areas of weakness. Future directions include extending these findings to slow mapping scenarios.
LEARNING OUTCOMES: The reader will understand how different components of phonological working memory contribute to the word learning problems of children with specific language impairment.

References

  1. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Oct;15(5):875-88 [PMID: 18926980]
  2. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Apr;47(2):407-20 [PMID: 15157140]
  3. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2004 Mar 1;21(2):213-28 [PMID: 21038201]
  4. J Mem Lang. 2000 May;42(4):481-496 [PMID: 21738287]
  5. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Oct;49(5):941-54 [PMID: 17077207]
  6. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010 Feb;19(1):78-94 [PMID: 19948760]
  7. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2007 Oct;38(4):353-64 [PMID: 17890515]
  8. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2007 Jan-Feb;42(1):59-75 [PMID: 17365086]
  9. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):481-7 [PMID: 15641436]
  10. Brain Lang. 1997 Sep;59(2):267-333 [PMID: 9299067]
  11. Cogn Psychol. 2005 Aug;51(1):42-100 [PMID: 16039935]
  12. J Commun Disord. 2003 May-Jun;36(3):189-208 [PMID: 12742667]
  13. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998 Oct;41(5):1136-46 [PMID: 9771635]
  14. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Dec;49(6):1175-92 [PMID: 17197489]
  15. J Commun Disord. 2008 Mar-Apr;41(2):85-107 [PMID: 17482204]
  16. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Dec;48(6):1378-96 [PMID: 16478378]
  17. Trends Neurosci. 2006 Jul;29(7):382-390 [PMID: 16806512]
  18. J Commun Disord. 2002 Jul-Aug;35(4):311-28 [PMID: 12160351]
  19. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Oct;48(5):1033-47 [PMID: 16411794]
  20. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Aug;40(4):708-22 [PMID: 9263938]
  21. Cogn Psychol. 2005 Mar;50(2):133-58 [PMID: 15680142]
  22. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Feb;47(1):187-98 [PMID: 15072538]
  23. Psychol Rev. 1998 Jan;105(1):158-73 [PMID: 9450375]
  24. Psychol Rev. 1992 Jan;99(1):122-49 [PMID: 1546114]
  25. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Nov;11(11):458-65 [PMID: 17983834]
  26. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000 Aug;43(4):865-78 [PMID: 11386474]
  27. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Jan;61(1):129-41 [PMID: 18038344]
  28. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Apr;48(2):439-58 [PMID: 15989403]

Grants

  1. R03 DC006841/NIDCD NIH HHS
  2. R03 DC006841-03/NIDCD NIH HHS
  3. R03-DC006841/NIDCD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Articulation Disorders
Child
Dyslexia
Female
Humans
Language
Language Development Disorders
Male
Memory, Long-Term
Memory, Short-Term
Phonetics
Recognition, Psychology

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0childrenlearningspecificlanguageSLImemorywordcontributelexicaldeficitsimpairmenthalfhypothesesinitialencodingphonologicallinklong-termfast-mappingtaskproblemfindingsworkingPURPOSE:purposestudydeterminefactorsMETHOD:Participantsincluded407-8-yearoldparticipantsdiagnosednormalskillstestedcontributionsinformationChildrentookpartcomputer-basedmanipulatedlengthphonotacticprobabilityaddressrecognitionproductioncomponentDataanalyzedusingmixedANOVAspost-hoctestingRESULTS:ResultsindicatemainimplicationslimitedcapacitystrongevidenceCONCLUSIONS:ableascertainaspectsproblematictermsmayallowcliniciansfocusinterventionknownareasweaknessFuturedirectionsincludeextendingslowmappingscenariosLEARNINGOUTCOMES:readerwillunderstanddifferentcomponentsproblemsPhonologicalimpairmentsimpairment:lie?

Similar Articles

Cited By