The importance of job control for workers with decreased work ability to remain productive at work.

Tilja I van den Berg, Suzan J Robroek, Jan F Plat, Marc A Koopmanschap, Alex Burdorf
Author Information
  1. Tilja I van den Berg: Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Workers with decreased work ability are at greater risk of reduced productivity at work. We hypothesized that work-related characteristics play an important role in supporting workers to remain productive despite decreased work ability.
METHODS: The study population consisted of 10,542 workers in 49 different companies in the Netherlands in 2005-2009. Productivity loss at work was defined on a 10-point scale by asking how much work was actually performed during regular hours on the last regular workday when compared with normal. Independent variables in the logistic regression analysis were individual characteristics, work-related factors, and the work ability index. Additive interactions between work-related factors and decreased work ability were evaluated by the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI).
RESULTS: The odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the likelihood of productivity loss at work were 2.03 (1.85-2.22), 3.50 (3.10-3.95), and 5.54 (4.37-7.03) for a good, moderate, and poor work ability, compared with an excellent work ability (reference group). Productivity loss at work was associated with lack of job control, poor skill discretion, and high work demands. There was a significant interaction between decreased work ability and lack of job control (RERI = 0.63 95% CI 0.11-1.16) with productivity loss at work.
CONCLUSION: The negative effects on work performance of decreased work ability may be partly counterbalanced by increased job control. This suggests that interventions among workers with (chronic) disease that cause a decreased work ability should include enlargement of possibilities to plan and pace their own activities at work.

References

  1. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005 Oct;31(5):367-74 [PMID: 16273963]
  2. J Occup Environ Med. 2005 Sep;47(9):958-66 [PMID: 16155481]
  3. J Occup Rehabil. 2007 Sep;17(3):547-79 [PMID: 17653835]
  4. J Occup Rehabil. 2007 Sep;17(3):370-82 [PMID: 17636455]
  5. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009 Jul;35(4):301-8 [PMID: 19471843]
  6. Eur J Epidemiol. 2005;20(7):575-9 [PMID: 16119429]
  7. J Occup Environ Med. 2004 Apr;46(4):398-412 [PMID: 15076658]
  8. Eur J Public Health. 2010 Feb;20(1):43-6 [PMID: 19525328]
  9. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 May;58(5):517-23 [PMID: 15845339]
  10. Am J Ind Med. 2009 Jan;52(1):49-56 [PMID: 18942667]
  11. Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(1):47-54 [PMID: 15693727]
  12. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998 Oct;3(4):322-55 [PMID: 9805280]
  13. Epidemiology. 1992 Sep;3(5):452-6 [PMID: 1391139]
  14. Eur J Gen Pract. 2009;15(2):74-9 [PMID: 19579152]
  15. Health Policy. 1999 Jul;48(1):13-27 [PMID: 10539583]
  16. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Nov;60(11):1105-15 [PMID: 17938051]
  17. Am J Public Health. 1981 Jul;71(7):694-705 [PMID: 7246835]
  18. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2008 Dec;34(6):420-9 [PMID: 19137203]
  19. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2007 Jun;33(3):161-4 [PMID: 17572826]
  20. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009 Jan;35(1):1-5 [PMID: 19277432]
  21. Occup Environ Med. 2001 Sep;58(9):597-603 [PMID: 11511747]
  22. Soc Sci Med. 2004 May;58(10):1857-68 [PMID: 15020004]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Efficiency
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Netherlands
Occupations
Task Performance and Analysis
Work Capacity Evaluation
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0workabilitydecreasedworkerslossjobcontrolproductivitywork-relatedriskcharacteristicsremainproductiveProductivityregularcomparedfactorsinteraction033poorlackPURPOSE:WorkersgreaterreducedhypothesizedplayimportantrolesupportingdespiteMETHODS:studypopulationconsisted1054249differentcompaniesNetherlands2005-2009defined10-pointscaleaskingmuchactuallyperformedhourslastworkdaynormalIndependentvariableslogisticregressionanalysisindividualindexAdditiveinteractionsevaluatedrelativeexcessdueRERIRESULTS:oddsratios95%confidenceintervalsCIlikelihood2185-2225010-395554437-7goodmoderateexcellentreferencegroupassociatedskilldiscretionhighdemandssignificantRERI = 06395% CI011-116CONCLUSION:negativeeffectsperformancemaypartlycounterbalancedincreasedsuggestsinterventionsamongchronicdiseasecauseincludeenlargementpossibilitiesplanpaceactivitiesimportance

Similar Articles

Cited By