Romantic partners' individual coping strategies and dyadic coping: implications for relationship functioning.

Lauren M Papp, Nicole L Witt
Author Information
  1. Lauren M Papp: Department of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA. papp@wisc.edu

Abstract

Individual coping strategies and dyadic coping independently predict partner well-being and relationship functioning; however, it is unclear whether the coping processes are inter-related and whether they uniquely contribute to romantic relationship functioning. One hundred heterosexual dating couples rated the individual coping strategy of negative mood regulation as well as positive and negative dyadic coping. Relationship functioning was assessed via partners' reports of relationship satisfaction and observers' ratings of negative interaction in conflict. Actor-Partner Interdependence Models (APIMs; Cook & Kenny, 2005; Kashy & Kenny, 2000) revealed associations between individual coping and dyadic coping in the predicted directions. APIMs also indicated the unique contributions of positive and negative dyadic coping to relationship functioning, above and beyond contributions of individual coping strategies. Implications of dyadic coping as a target of efforts to prevent or treat partner and/or relational distress are discussed.

References

  1. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:745-74 [PMID: 14744233]
  2. Health Soc Work. 2006 May;31(2):117-27 [PMID: 16776029]
  3. Psychol Bull. 2007 Nov;133(6):920-54 [PMID: 17967089]
  4. J Fam Psychol. 2009 Aug;23(4):521-30 [PMID: 19685987]
  5. Psychol Addict Behav. 2010 Sep;24(3):415-23 [PMID: 20853926]
  6. Psychosom Med. 2001 Jan-Feb;63(1):32-9 [PMID: 11211062]
  7. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Aug;53(2):337-48 [PMID: 3625471]
  8. J Fam Psychol. 2009 Dec;23(6):769-78 [PMID: 20001135]
  9. J Pers Assess. 1990 Summer;54(3-4):546-63 [PMID: 2348341]
  10. J Fam Psychol. 2005 Mar;19(1):98-110 [PMID: 15796656]
  11. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009 Mar;29(2):105-15 [PMID: 19167139]
  12. Clin Psychol Rev. 2004 Jan;23(8):1139-62 [PMID: 14729426]
  13. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Feb;60(2):327-34 [PMID: 2016673]
  14. J Soc Psychol. 1999 Aug;139(4):540-3 [PMID: 10457766]
  15. J Fam Psychol. 2007 Dec;21(4):572-83 [PMID: 18179329]
  16. J Fam Psychol. 2007 Jun;21(2):297-306 [PMID: 17605552]
  17. J Fam Psychol. 2006 Sep;20(3):485-93 [PMID: 16938007]
  18. J Pers. 2000 Aug;68(4):757-88 [PMID: 10934689]
  19. Psychol Bull. 2009 Jan;135(1):121-41 [PMID: 19210056]
  20. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Feb;56(2):267-83 [PMID: 2926629]
  21. Psychol Bull. 2001 Jul;127(4):472-503 [PMID: 11439708]
  22. Behav Res Ther. 2007 May;45(5):939-50 [PMID: 17010932]
  23. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Dec;76(6):944-54 [PMID: 19045963]
  24. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Sep;61(3):404-12 [PMID: 1941511]

Grants

  1. R03 HD057346/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. R03 HD057346-02/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adaptation, Psychological
Adolescent
Adult
Affect
Conflict, Psychological
Female
Humans
Interpersonal Relations
Male
Personal Satisfaction
Sexual Partners
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0copingdyadicrelationshipfunctioningindividualnegativestrategiespartnerwhetherpositivepartners'APIMs&KennycontributionsIndividualindependentlypredictwell-beinghoweverunclearprocessesinter-relateduniquelycontributeromanticOnehundredheterosexualdatingcouplesratedstrategymoodregulationwellRelationshipassessedviareportssatisfactionobservers'ratingsinteractionconflictActor-PartnerInterdependenceModelsCook2005Kashy2000revealedassociationspredicteddirectionsalsoindicateduniquebeyondImplicationstargeteffortspreventtreatand/orrelationaldistressdiscussedRomanticcoping:implications

Similar Articles

Cited By (29)