Fall prevention in acute care hospitals: a randomized trial.

Patricia C Dykes, Diane L Carroll, Ann Hurley, Stuart Lipsitz, Angela Benoit, Frank Chang, Seth Meltzer, Ruslana Tsurikova, Lyubov Zuyov, Blackford Middleton
Author Information
  1. Patricia C Dykes: Brigham and Women's Hospital/Partners HealthCare System, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. pdykes@partners.org

Abstract

CONTEXT: Falls cause injury and death for persons of all ages, but risk of falls increases markedly with age. Hospitalization further increases risk, yet no evidence exists to support short-stay hospital-based fall prevention strategies to reduce patient falls.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a fall prevention tool kit (FPTK) using health information technology (HIT) decreases patient falls in hospitals.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Cluster randomized study conducted January 1, 2009, through June 30, 2009, comparing patient fall rates in 4 urban US hospitals in units that received usual care (4 units and 5104 patients) or the intervention (4 units and 5160 patients).
INTERVENTION: The FPTK integrated existing communication and workflow patterns into the HIT application. Based on a valid fall risk assessment scale completed by a nurse, the FPTK software tailored fall prevention interventions to address patients' specific determinants of fall risk. The FPTK produced bed posters composed of brief text with an accompanying icon, patient education handouts, and plans of care, all communicating patient-specific alerts to key stakeholders.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was patient falls per 1000 patient-days adjusted for site and patient care unit. A secondary outcome was fall-related injuries.
RESULTS: During the 6-month intervention period, the number of patients with falls differed between control (n = 87) and intervention (n = 67) units (P=.02). Site-adjusted fall rates were significantly higher in control units (4.18 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 3.45-5.06] per 1000 patient-days) than in intervention units (3.15 [95% CI, 2.54-3.90] per 1000 patient-days; P = .04). The FPTK was found to be particularly effective with patients aged 65 years or older (adjusted rate difference, 2.08 [95% CI, 0.61-3.56] per 1000 patient-days; P = .003). No significant effect was noted in fall-related injuries.
CONCLUSION: The use of a fall prevention tool kit in hospital units compared with usual care significantly reduced rate of falls.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00675935.

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT00675935

References

  1. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Aug;56(8):1383-9 [PMID: 18808597]
  2. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009 Nov 14;2009:153-7 [PMID: 20351840]
  3. Psychosomatics. 2009 May-Jun;50(3):218-26 [PMID: 19567760]
  4. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Dec;48(12):1679-89 [PMID: 11129762]
  5. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 May-Jun;12(3):338-45 [PMID: 15684136]
  6. Singapore Med J. 2009 Apr;50(4):425-32 [PMID: 19421690]
  7. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;29(6):539-45 [PMID: 18476777]
  8. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 May;28(5):544-50 [PMID: 17464913]
  9. BMJ. 2008 Apr 5;336(7647):758-60 [PMID: 18332052]
  10. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;146:455-9 [PMID: 19592885]
  11. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 4;360(23):2390-3 [PMID: 19494213]
  12. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2008 Apr-Jun;31(2):127-39 [PMID: 18360143]
  13. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Aug;56(8):1390-7 [PMID: 18662214]
  14. J Nurs Adm. 2009 Jun;39(6):299-304 [PMID: 19509605]
  15. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 19;348(25):2526-34 [PMID: 12815139]
  16. J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Jul;19(7):732-9 [PMID: 15209586]
  17. J Gerontol. 1990 Nov;45(6):P239-43 [PMID: 2229948]
  18. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jun 07;6:69 [PMID: 16759386]
  19. Nurs Econ. 2008 May-Jun;26(3):179-87 [PMID: 18616056]
  20. J Nurs Care Qual. 2010 Jan-Mar;25(1):22-30 [PMID: 19553863]
  21. Am J Med. 1995 Aug;99(2):137-43 [PMID: 7625418]
  22. Lancet. 2005 Nov 26;366(9500):1885-93 [PMID: 16310556]
  23. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD005465 [PMID: 20091578]
  24. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Jan;56(1):29-36 [PMID: 18031484]
  25. Vital Health Stat 10. 2009 Sep;(241):1-55 [PMID: 20187342]
  26. Int J Nurs Pract. 2001 Feb;7(1):38-45 [PMID: 11811346]
  27. Age Ageing. 2004 Mar;33(2):122-30 [PMID: 14960426]
  28. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Aug;56(8):1563-5 [PMID: 18808601]

Grants

  1. L30 NR010962/NINR NIH HHS
  2. L30 NR010962-01/NINR NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Accidental Falls
Aged
Communication
Female
Hospital Information Systems
Hospitals, Urban
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Education as Topic
Risk Assessment
Software
Treatment Outcome
Wounds and Injuries

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0fallunitsfallspatientpreventionFPTKcarerisk4patientsinterventionper1000patient-days=[95%increasestoolkitHIThospitalsrandomized2009ratesusualoutcomeadjustedfall-relatedinjuriescontrolnsignificantly3CI2PrateCONTEXT:FallscauseinjurydeathpersonsagesmarkedlyageHospitalizationyetevidenceexistssupportshort-stayhospital-basedstrategiesreduceOBJECTIVE:investigatewhetherusinghealthinformationtechnologydecreasesDESIGNSETTINGANDPATIENTS:ClusterstudyconductedJanuary1June30comparingurbanUSreceived51045160INTERVENTION:integratedexistingcommunicationworkflowpatternsapplicationBasedvalidassessmentscalecompletednursesoftwaretailoredinterventionsaddresspatients'specificdeterminantsproducedbedposterscomposedbrieftextaccompanyingiconeducationhandoutsplanscommunicatingpatient-specificalertskeystakeholdersMAINOUTCOMEMEASURES:primarysiteunitsecondaryRESULTS:6-monthperiodnumberdiffered8767P=02Site-adjustedhigher18confidenceinterval{CI}45-506]1554-390]04foundparticularlyeffectiveaged65yearsolderdifference08061-356]003significanteffectnotedCONCLUSION:usehospitalcomparedreducedTRIALREGISTRATION:clinicaltrialsgovIdentifier:NCT00675935Fallacutehospitals:trial

Similar Articles

Cited By