Dose response of retinol and isotretinoin in the prevention of nonmelanoma skin cancer recurrence.

Mary C Clouser, Denise J Roe, Janet A Foote, Robin B Harris, David S Alberts
Author Information
  1. Mary C Clouser: Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, Arizona, USA. mclouser@u.arizona.edu

Abstract

Using data from a randomized, double blind, study of the efficacy of retinol or isotretinoin vs. placebo on recurrence of nonmelanoma skin cancer in high-risk subjects, a reanalysis of the original intent to treat analysis was performed in a dose-response format. Cox proportional hazards models describe the relationship between dose quartiles of isotretinoin and retinol use and time to first occurrence of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or basal cell carcinoma (BCC) in crude and adjusted models. Neither the isotretinoin nor retinol models showed any significance at any quartile for reduction in first BCC or SCC occurrence. Crude and adjusted retinol models show a statistically significant increase in risk of developing an SCC in the first quartile, whereas only the crude model shows a statistically significant increase in risk in the first quartile of the isotretinoin model. For retinol and SCC, hazard ratios (HRs) for the first quartile were as follows: HR = 2.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.67-5.10 crude; HR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.00-3.80 adjusted. For isotretinoin and SCC, HRs for the first quartile were as follows: HR = 2.38, 95% CI = 1.35-4.19 crude; HR = 1.69, 95% CI = 0.87-3.31 adjusted. Test for trend was not significant in any of the models. These analyses confirm the results of the original intent to treat analyses and raise an interesting question related to the potential for increased risk for patients in the first quartile of retinol dose.

References

  1. Pharmacol Rev. 1998 Jun;50(2):315-33 [PMID: 9647871]
  2. Nutr Cancer. 1983;5(2):96-106 [PMID: 6359074]
  3. Br J Cancer. 1986 Dec;54(6):957-61 [PMID: 3801291]
  4. Gynecol Oncol. 1981 Oct;12(2 Pt 2):S331-40 [PMID: 6946954]
  5. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997 Nov;6(11):957-61 [PMID: 9367070]
  6. Australas J Dermatol. 2002 Nov;43(4):269-73 [PMID: 12423433]
  7. J Clin Pharmacol. 1997 Aug;37(8):667-72 [PMID: 9378838]
  8. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1981 Jan;66(1):7-16 [PMID: 6935468]
  9. Oncol Rep. 2004 Jun;11(6):1297-305 [PMID: 15138569]
  10. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Dec 1;96(23):1743-50 [PMID: 15572756]
  11. J Clin Oncol. 1995 Aug;13(8):1933-8 [PMID: 7636533]
  12. Nutrition. 2000 Nov-Dec;16(11-12):1084-9 [PMID: 11118831]
  13. Control Clin Trials. 2000 Jun;21(3):241-3 [PMID: 10822121]
  14. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1988 Jul;19(1 Pt 2):176-85 [PMID: 3165982]
  15. Biometrics. 1996 Sep;52(3):1002-17 [PMID: 8805765]
  16. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980 Mar 12;605(1):33-91 [PMID: 6989400]
  17. J Clin Oncol. 1983 Jun;1(6):394-9 [PMID: 6668507]
  18. Nutr Cancer. 1992;18(3):237-44 [PMID: 1296197]
  19. Carcinogenesis. 2000 Jul;21(7):1271-9 [PMID: 10874003]
  20. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Aug;47(8):829-36 [PMID: 7730885]
  21. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989 Jul;21(1):144-5 [PMID: 2745766]
  22. Dermatologica. 1987;175 Suppl 1:138-44 [PMID: 3480250]
  23. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 1998 Jan;10(1):42-7 [PMID: 9552756]
  24. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Jul;14(7):1596-607 [PMID: 16030089]
  25. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1982 Apr;6(4 Pt 2 Suppl):815-23 [PMID: 6950957]
  26. Agents Actions. 1970 Aug;1(4):172-5 [PMID: 5520364]
  27. Br J Dermatol. 1999 Apr;140(4):656-60 [PMID: 10233316]
  28. Cancer Lett. 1997 Mar 19;114(1-2):203-5 [PMID: 9103292]
  29. Stat Med. 1991 Oct;10(10):1595-605 [PMID: 1947515]
  30. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992 Mar 4;84(5):328-32 [PMID: 1738183]
  31. Neoplasma. 1984;31(5):615-8 [PMID: 6594593]
  32. N Engl J Med. 1988 Jun 23;318(25):1633-7 [PMID: 3287161]
  33. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003 Oct;49(4):644-50 [PMID: 14512910]
  34. Nutr Rev. 1977 Apr;35(4):65-9 [PMID: 854240]
  35. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Apr 5;98(7):441-50 [PMID: 16595780]
  36. N Engl J Med. 1990 Sep 20;323(12):795-801 [PMID: 2202902]
  37. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Oct;107(4):499-502 [PMID: 3477106]
  38. Cancer Treat Rep. 1987 Apr;71(4):391-405 [PMID: 3548957]
  39. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Jan;57(1):6-15 [PMID: 7828382]
  40. Br J Cancer. 1970 Jun;24(2):235-52 [PMID: 5451567]

Grants

  1. P01 CA027502/NCI NIH HHS
  2. CA-34256/NCI NIH HHS
  3. CA-27502/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Aged
Antineoplastic Agents
Arizona
California
Carcinoma, Basal Cell
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Isotretinoin
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Patient Dropouts
Proportional Hazards Models
Skin Neoplasms
Vitamin A

Chemicals

Antineoplastic Agents
Vitamin A
Isotretinoin

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0=retinolfirstisotretinoinquartilemodelsSCC1crudeadjustedHR95%CIsignificantriskrecurrencenonmelanomaskincanceroriginalintenttreatdoseoccurrencecellcarcinomaBCCstatisticallyincreasemodelHRsfollows:2analysesUsingdatarandomizeddoubleblindstudyefficacyvsplacebohigh-risksubjectsreanalysisanalysisperformeddose-responseformatCoxproportionalhazardsdescriberelationshipquartilesusetimesquamousbasalNeithershowedsignificancereductionCrudeshowdevelopingwhereasshowshazardratios92confidenceinterval67-5109500-3803835-41969087-331TesttrendconfirmresultsraiseinterestingquestionrelatedpotentialincreasedpatientsDoseresponseprevention

Similar Articles

Cited By