Energy allowances for solid fats and added sugars in nutritionally adequate U.S. diets estimated at 17-33% by a linear programming model.

Matthieu Maillot, Adam Drewnowski
Author Information
  1. Matthieu Maillot: Nutritional Sciences Program and Center for Public Health Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-3410.

Abstract

The 2010 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee has recommended that no more than 5-15% of total dietary energy should be derived from solid fats and added sugars (SoFAS). The guideline was based on USDA food pattern modeling analyses that met the Dietary Reference Intake recommendations and Dietary Guidelines and followed typical American eating habits. This study recreated food intake patterns for 6 of the same gender-age groups by using USDA data sources and a mathematical optimization technique known as linear programming. The analytic process identified food consumption patterns based on 128 food categories that met the nutritional goals for 9 vitamins, 9 minerals, 8 macronutrients, and dietary fiber and minimized deviation from typical American eating habits. Linear programming Model 1 created gender- and age-specific food patterns that corresponded to energy needs for each group. Model 2 created food patterns that were iso-caloric with diets observed for that group in the 2001-2002 NHANES. The optimized food patterns were evaluated with respect to MyPyramid servings goals, energy density [kcal/g (1 kcal = 4.18 kJ)], and energy cost (US$/2000 kcal). The optimized food patterns had more servings of vegetables and fruit, lower energy density, and higher cost compared with the observed diets. All nutrient goals were met. In contrast to the much lower USDA estimates, the 2 models placed SoFAS allowances at between 17 and 33% of total energy, depending on energy needs.

References

  1. J Nutr. 2006 Apr;136(4):1021-6 [PMID: 16549468]
  2. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Feb;91(2):421-30 [PMID: 19939986]
  3. Br J Nutr. 1993 Jul;70(1):27-35 [PMID: 8399108]
  4. Public Health Nutr. 2008 Apr;11(4):395-404 [PMID: 17666136]
  5. J Nutr. 2008 Jun;138(6):1107-13 [PMID: 18492842]
  6. J Nutr. 2005 Feb;135(2):273-8 [PMID: 15671225]
  7. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2006 Nov-Dec;38(6 Suppl):S78-92 [PMID: 17116598]
  8. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2006 Mar-Apr;38(2):82-90 [PMID: 16595286]
  9. J Nutr. 2004 Apr;134(4):951-7 [PMID: 15051853]
  10. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Nov;106(11):1759-65 [PMID: 17081826]
  11. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(8):552 [PMID: 14576885]
  12. J Nutr. 2009 Sep;139(9):1721-7 [PMID: 19625703]
  13. J Nutr. 2009 Oct;139(10):1994-9 [PMID: 19692531]
  14. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Nov;102(11):1621-30 [PMID: 12449285]
  15. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008 May;108(5):804-14 [PMID: 18442504]
  16. J Nutr. 2006 May;136(5):1341-6 [PMID: 16614427]
  17. J Nutr. 2002 Dec;132(12):3764-71 [PMID: 12468621]
  18. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2006 Nov-Dec;38(6 Suppl):S93-S107 [PMID: 17116599]
  19. J Nutr. 2009 Aug;139(8):1541-8 [PMID: 19535422]
  20. Public Health Nutr. 2010 Aug;13(8):1178-85 [PMID: 20105388]

Grants

  1. R01 DK076608/NIDDK NIH HHS
  2. R21 085406/PHS HHS
  3. R01 DK 077068/NIDDK NIH HHS
  4. P20 RR020774/NCRR NIH HHS
  5. R21 DK085406/NIDDK NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Diet
Dietary Fats
Dietary Sucrose
Energy Intake
Female
Humans
Linear Models
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Biological
Nutrition Policy
Nutritional Requirements
United States
Young Adult

Chemicals

Dietary Fats
Dietary Sucrose

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0foodenergypatternsDietaryUSDAmetprogramminggoalsdietsGuidelinestotaldietarysolidfatsaddedsugarsSoFASbasedtypicalAmericaneatinghabitslinear9Model1createdneedsgroup2observedoptimizedservingsdensitykcalcostlowerallowances2010AdvisoryCommitteerecommended5-15%derivedguidelinepatternmodelinganalysesReferenceIntakerecommendationsfollowedstudyrecreatedintake6gender-agegroupsusingdatasourcesmathematicaloptimizationtechniqueknownanalyticprocessidentifiedconsumption128categoriesnutritionalvitaminsminerals8macronutrientsfiberminimizeddeviationLineargender-age-specificcorrespondediso-caloric2001-2002NHANESevaluatedrespectMyPyramid[kcal/g=418kJ]US$/2000vegetablesfruithighercomparednutrientcontrastmuchestimatesmodelsplaced1733%dependingEnergynutritionallyadequateUSestimated17-33%model

Similar Articles

Cited By