Reproductive outcome of septate uterus following hysteroscopic septum resection.

Priya Selvaraj, Kamala Selvaraj
Author Information
  1. Priya Selvaraj: Fertility Research Centre, G G Hospital, 6E - Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai - 600 034, India.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic septum resection in patients with primary and secondary (recurrent pregnancy loss [RPL] and bad obstetric history [BOH]) infertility.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hysteroscopic septum resection was performed on 26 patients with a history of either recurrent pregnancy loss, BOH or infertility. The septum resection was performed using a bipolar versapoint system. Reproductive performance of these patients after septum resection was analyzed. The main outcome measures were clinical pregnancy and live birth rates.
RESULTS: Hysteroscopic septum resection was performed on seven patients with the history of secondary infertility. Post operatively, the pregnancy rate was 86% (n=6), and the live birth rate was 67% (n=4). After septum resection in 19 primary infertile patients, 6 (32%) patients conceived which resulted in live birth rates of 67% (n=4).
CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopic septum resection using bipolar versapoint system is an effective and safe approach for the removal of septum. Hysteroscopic septum resection in women with septate uterus significantly improves the live birth rates and future fertility is not impaired.

Keywords

References

  1. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Aug;14(4):269-79 [PMID: 14578774]
  2. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Aug;14(4):409-15 [PMID: 12151831]
  3. Eur J Radiol. 2005 Feb;53(2):274-9 [PMID: 15664292]
  4. Hum Reprod Update. 2001 Mar-Apr;7(2):161-74 [PMID: 11284660]
  5. Fertil Steril. 2006 Mar;85(3):700-5 [PMID: 16500341]
  6. J Reprod Med. 2006 Mar;51(3):169-76 [PMID: 16674011]
  7. Fertil Steril. 1988 Jun;49(6):944-55 [PMID: 3371491]
  8. Ginekol Pol. 2000 Sep;71(9):1031-5 [PMID: 11082970]
  9. Radiology. 2004 Oct;233(1):19-34 [PMID: 15317956]
  10. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Mar 26;107(1):98-100 [PMID: 12593906]
  11. Hum Reprod. 1998 May;13(5):1188-93 [PMID: 9647545]
  12. Fertil Steril. 2008 Jan;89(1):1-16 [PMID: 18155200]
  13. Hum Reprod. 2006 Apr;21(4):1047-51 [PMID: 16410337]
  14. Fertil Steril. 2004 Jun;81(6):1675-8 [PMID: 15193494]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0septumresectionpatientspregnancyinfertilityHysteroscopiclivebirthoutcomerecurrentlosshistoryperformedratesseptateuterusfollowinghysteroscopicprimarysecondaryBOHusingbipolarversapointsystemReproductiverate67%n=4OBJECTIVE:evaluatereproductive[RPL]badobstetric[BOH]STUDYDESIGN:RetrospectivestudyMATERIALSANDMETHODS:26eitherperformanceanalyzedmainmeasuresclinicalRESULTS:sevenPostoperatively86%n=619infertile632%conceivedresultedCONCLUSION:effectivesafeapproachremovalwomensignificantlyimprovesfuturefertilityimpairedhysteroscopy

Similar Articles

Cited By