Executive function in pathological gamblers and healthy controls.

David M Ledgerwood, Emily S Orr, Kristen A Kaploun, Aleks Milosevic, G Ron Frisch, Nicholas Rupcich, Leslie H Lundahl
Author Information
  1. David M Ledgerwood: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48207, USA. dledgerw@med.wayne.edu

Abstract

Executive function (EF) deficits may underlie some of the impulse control problems seen in pathological gambling. Pathological gamblers (PGs, n = 45) and controls (n = 45) were compared on several measures of EF (including measures of response inhibition, working memory, cognitive flexibility and perseveration, planning and decision-making), as well as memory and intelligence tests to examine whether PGs evidence EF dysfunction. Compared with controls, PGs exhibited specific deficits on measures of planning and decision-making. PGs also exhibited relative deficits on a measure of perseveration, but this deficit was no longer significant after controlling for group differences in intelligence. These results suggest that PGs may experience deficits on specific components of EF.

References

  1. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 May;66(5):564-74 [PMID: 15889941]
  2. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009 Nov;207(1):163-72 [PMID: 19727677]
  3. Arch Neurol. 2007 Feb;64(2):212-6 [PMID: 17296836]
  4. Psychol Med. 2008 Jan;38(1):41-50 [PMID: 17498322]
  5. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1982 Jun 25;298(1089):199-209 [PMID: 6125971]
  6. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Nov 1;105(1-2):89-96 [PMID: 19615829]
  7. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;60(8):828-36 [PMID: 12912766]
  8. Neuropsychologia. 2009 Nov;47(13):2916-26 [PMID: 19560477]
  9. Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Feb 15;51(4):334-41 [PMID: 11958785]
  10. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Apr;23(1):137-51 [PMID: 15795140]
  11. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Mar;29(2):298-306 [PMID: 12696817]
  12. Science. 1997 Feb 28;275(5304):1293-5 [PMID: 9036851]
  13. Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Nov;160(11):1990-4 [PMID: 14594746]
  14. J Gambl Stud. 1998 Spring;14(1):51-71 [PMID: 12766434]
  15. Br J Clin Psychol. 2003 Jun;42(Pt 2):205-9 [PMID: 12828808]
  16. Addiction. 2006 Apr;101(4):534-47 [PMID: 16548933]
  17. Psychiatry Res. 2005 Jan 30;133(1):91-9 [PMID: 15698681]
  18. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2001 Jun 1;63(1):29-38 [PMID: 11297829]
  19. Addiction. 1998 Jun;93(6):895-905 [PMID: 9744125]
  20. Addict Behav. 2004 Nov;29(8):1685-90 [PMID: 15451138]
  21. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Jan;34(1):87-107 [PMID: 19632269]
  22. J Gen Psychol. 1948 Jul;39:15-22 [PMID: 18889466]
  23. J Neurosci. 2004 Dec 8;24(49):11017-22 [PMID: 15590917]

MeSH Term

Adult
Attention
Behavior, Addictive
Cognition
Decision Making
Executive Function
Female
Gambling
Health Status
Humans
Inhibition, Psychological
Male
Middle Aged
Motivation
Reference Values

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PGsEFdeficitscontrolsmeasuresExecutivefunctionmaypathologicalgamblersn=45memoryperseverationplanningdecision-makingintelligenceexhibitedspecificunderlieimpulsecontrolproblemsseengamblingPathologicalcomparedseveralincludingresponseinhibitionworkingcognitiveflexibilitywelltestsexaminewhetherevidencedysfunctionComparedalsorelativemeasuredeficitlongersignificantcontrollinggroupdifferencesresultssuggestexperiencecomponentshealthy

Similar Articles

Cited By