Pigeons exhibit higher accuracy for chosen memory tests than for forced memory tests in duration matching-to-sample.

Allison Adams, Angelo Santi
Author Information
  1. Allison Adams: Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 3C5.

Abstract

Following training to match 2- and 8-sec durations of feederlight to red and green comparisons with a 0-sec baseline delay, pigeons were allowed to choose to take a memory test or to escape the memory test. The effects of sample omission, increases in retention interval, and variation in trial spacing on selection of the escape option and accuracy were studied. During initial testing, escaping the test did not increase as the task became more difficult, and there was no difference in accuracy between chosen and forced memory tests. However, with extended training, accuracy for chosen tests was significantly greater than for forced tests. In addition, two pigeons exhibited higher accuracy on chosen tests than on forced tests at the short retention interval and greater escape rates at the long retention interval. These results have not been obtained in previous studies with pigeons when the choice to take the test or to escape the test is given before test stimuli are presented. It appears that task-specific methodological factors may determine whether a particular species will exhibit the two behavioral effects that were initially proposed as potentially indicative of metacognition.

References

  1. Behav Processes. 2007 Feb 22;74(2):286-92 [PMID: 17110057]
  2. Curr Biol. 2007 Mar 20;17(6):551-5 [PMID: 17346969]
  3. Behav Brain Sci. 2003 Jun;26(3):317-39; discussion 340-73 [PMID: 14968691]
  4. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1998 Sep;127(3):227-50 [PMID: 9742715]
  5. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Aug;15(4):679-91 [PMID: 18792496]
  6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Apr 24;98(9):5359-62 [PMID: 11274360]
  7. Anim Cogn. 2004 Oct;7(4):239-46 [PMID: 15105996]
  8. Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2009 Jan 1;4:17-28 [PMID: 20046911]
  9. Psychol Sci. 2007 Jan;18(1):64-71 [PMID: 17362380]
  10. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Apr;32(2):111-9 [PMID: 16634654]
  11. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 May;135(2):282-97 [PMID: 16719654]
  12. Behav Processes. 2006 May 1;72(2):184-9 [PMID: 16460887]
  13. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2008 Apr;34(2):266-82 [PMID: 18426309]
  14. Anim Cogn. 2009 Jul;12(4):575-85 [PMID: 19242741]
  15. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Jul;35(3):371-81 [PMID: 19594282]
  16. Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2009;4:1-16 [PMID: 26516391]
  17. Cognition. 1997 Jan;62(1):75-97 [PMID: 8997171]

MeSH Term

Analysis of Variance
Animals
Behavior, Animal
Choice Behavior
Cognition
Columbidae
Discrimination Learning
Memory
Time Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0teststestmemoryaccuracyescapechosenforcedpigeonsretentionintervaltrainingtakeeffectsgreatertwohigherexhibitFollowingmatch2-8-secdurationsfeederlightredgreencomparisons0-secbaselinedelayallowedchoosesampleomissionincreasesvariationtrialspacingselectionoptionstudiedinitialtestingescapingincreasetaskbecamedifficultdifferenceHoweverextendedsignificantlyadditionexhibitedshortrateslongresultsobtainedpreviousstudieschoicegivenstimulipresentedappearstask-specificmethodologicalfactorsmaydeterminewhetherparticularspecieswillbehavioralinitiallyproposedpotentiallyindicativemetacognitionPigeonsdurationmatching-to-sample

Similar Articles

Cited By