Relations between timing, position, and grouping in short-term memory.

Simon Farrell, Victoria Wise, Anna Lelièvre
Author Information
  1. Simon Farrell: University of Bristol, Bristol, England. simon.farrell@bristol.ac.uk

Abstract

This article is concerned with how information about time and position in a sequence is represented in short-term memory and expressed in the dynamics of serial recall. Temporal-distinctiveness theories of memory predict that isolating a list item in time will improve recall accuracy for that item. Although the majority of research in short-term memory has failed to demonstrate a temporal isolation effect (TIE), there are occasions on which a TIE is observed. The disparity in results has been explained by assuming that participants can adaptively weight temporal and nontemporal information at retrieval, with differences between experiments promoting or discouraging reliance on time as a source of episodic information. A particular focus of the present study is the finding that the TIE is substantially observed in standard serial recall only when participants are instructed to group the list into minisequences. The findings of two experiments using instructed grouping replicated this effect but showed that it is attributable to a longer gap at the group boundary enhancing the positive effect of grouping on recall accuracy. These results show that the hierarchical representations usually associated with temporal grouping are also elicited by instructed grouping but that an additional and nonspecific benefit to recall obtains from lengthening the pause between groups. An additional role for time is identified in the timing of responses: The dynamics of input sequences tend to be mirrored in output sequences for ungrouped lists, whereas the primacy pattern in grouped lists is for a longer duration to speed access to the following group when that duration occurs at an instructed group boundary.

References

  1. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002 Apr;55(2):391-424 [PMID: 12047051]
  2. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989 May;15(3):469-479 [PMID: 2524546]
  3. Mem Cognit. 2000 Jun;28(4):529-38 [PMID: 10946536]
  4. Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Mar;9(1):59-79 [PMID: 12026954]
  5. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Mar;13(3):120-6 [PMID: 19223224]
  6. Psychol Rev. 2007 Jul;114(3):539-76 [PMID: 17638496]
  7. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Dec;12(6):999-1004 [PMID: 16615319]
  8. Memory. 1996 May;4(3):225-42 [PMID: 8735609]
  9. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 May;28(3):445-57 [PMID: 12018497]
  10. Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Apr;14(2):256-60 [PMID: 17694910]
  11. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Jun;16(3):524-8 [PMID: 19451379]
  12. Mem Cognit. 2007 Oct;35(7):1724-34 [PMID: 18062549]
  13. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov;34(6):1349-55 [PMID: 18980399]
  14. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1986 Jan;12(1):3-15 [PMID: 2949048]
  15. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2003 Nov;56(8):1279-88; discussion 1301-6 [PMID: 14578084]
  16. Psychol Rev. 1960 Jan;67:16-31 [PMID: 14425343]
  17. Memory. 2005 Apr-May;13(3-4):283-92 [PMID: 15948613]
  18. Mem Cognit. 1999 Sep;27(5):915-27 [PMID: 10540820]
  19. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 May;30(3):656-74 [PMID: 15099134]
  20. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990 Mar;16(2):316-27 [PMID: 2137870]
  21. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Jan;31(1):175-81 [PMID: 15641915]
  22. Psychol Rev. 2000 Jan;107(1):127-81 [PMID: 10687405]
  23. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Mar;12(3):92-8 [PMID: 18262827]
  24. Psychol Sci. 2006 Jan;17(1):67-73 [PMID: 16371146]
  25. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Nov;35(6):1545-51 [PMID: 19857023]
  26. Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Aug;13(4):717-23 [PMID: 17201375]
  27. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Feb;136(1):43-63 [PMID: 17324084]
  28. Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42 [PMID: 9176953]
  29. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Sep;18(5):931-7 [PMID: 1402717]
  30. Psychol Rev. 2008 Jul;115(3):544-76 [PMID: 18729591]
  31. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jan;34(1):128-45 [PMID: 18194059]
  32. Memory. 2001 Jul-Nov;9(4-6):313-22 [PMID: 11594354]
  33. Q J Exp Psychol. 1969 May;21(2):148-55 [PMID: 5787974]
  34. Cogn Psychol. 1998 Jul;36(2):73-137 [PMID: 9721198]
  35. Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Jun;13(3):458-65 [PMID: 17048731]
  36. Mem Cognit. 2010 Oct;38(7):849-59 [PMID: 20921098]
  37. Psychol Rev. 1998 Oct;105(4):761-81 [PMID: 9830378]
  38. Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6 [PMID: 9176952]
  39. Q J Exp Psychol. 1969 May;21(2):137-47 [PMID: 5787973]
  40. Mem Cognit. 2008 Jul;36(5):957-67 [PMID: 18630202]
  41. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Nov;35(6):1411-25 [PMID: 19857013]
  42. Mem Cognit. 2006 Sep;34(6):1368-75 [PMID: 17225515]

MeSH Term

Adult
Association Learning
Attention
Female
Humans
Male
Memory, Short-Term
Reaction Time
Serial Learning
Time Perception
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0recallgroupingtimememoryinstructedgroupinformationshort-termtemporaleffectTIEpositiondynamicsseriallistitemaccuracyobservedresultsparticipantsexperimentslongerboundaryadditionaltimingsequenceslistsdurationarticleconcernedsequencerepresentedexpressedTemporal-distinctivenesstheoriespredictisolatingwillimproveAlthoughmajorityresearchfaileddemonstrateisolationoccasionsdisparityexplainedassumingcanadaptivelyweightnontemporalretrievaldifferencespromotingdiscouragingreliancesourceepisodicparticularfocuspresentstudyfindingsubstantiallystandardminisequencesfindingstwousingreplicatedshowedattributablegapenhancingpositiveshowhierarchicalrepresentationsusuallyassociatedalsoelicitednonspecificbenefitobtainslengtheningpausegroupsroleidentifiedresponses:inputtendmirroredoutputungroupedwhereasprimacypatterngroupedspeedaccessfollowingoccursRelations

Similar Articles

Cited By