Action and attentional load can influence aperture effects on motion perception.

Patricia R DeLucia, Tammy E Ott
Author Information
  1. Patricia R DeLucia: Department of Psychology, Texas Tech University, MS 2051, Lubbock, TX 79409-2051, USA. pat.delucia@ttu.edu

Abstract

When a moving featureless contour is viewed through a stationary circular aperture that occludes the contour's endpoints and the contour moves in a direction non-parallel to its orientation, observers report the contour's direction of motion as perpendicular to the contour's orientation regardless of its actual direction. In typical studies of this aperture effect on motion perception, observers made perceptual judgments of the line's motion. The aperture effect was not measured when observers actively controlled the line's motion. In addition, effects of attentional load on the aperture effect were not measured. Here, we demonstrated that attentional load influenced the aperture effect. Active control reduced the aperture effect, but did not eliminate it. Results have theoretical implications for motion perception and practical implications for the design of technologies that limit an observer's field-of-view such as surgical cameras.

References

  1. J Vis. 2007 Jul 24;7(10):10.1-10 [PMID: 17997679]
  2. Perception. 1998;27(9):1041-54 [PMID: 10341934]
  3. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Feb;4(2):42-50 [PMID: 10652521]
  4. Perception. 1993;22(10):1155-74 [PMID: 8047406]
  5. Neuron. 1997 Apr;18(4):591-8 [PMID: 9136768]
  6. Perception. 1997;26(3):287-300 [PMID: 9282226]
  7. Perception. 1989;18(3):303-20 [PMID: 2798015]
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Mar 16;96(6):3314-9 [PMID: 10077681]
  9. Trends Neurosci. 2004 Apr;27(4):174-7 [PMID: 15108685]
  10. Vision Res. 1993 Jun;33(9):1207-17 [PMID: 8333170]
  11. Vision Res. 1989;29(5):619-26 [PMID: 2603398]
  12. Nat Neurosci. 2006 Nov;9(11):1449-57 [PMID: 17028586]
  13. Percept Psychophys. 1995 May;57(4):533-45 [PMID: 7596750]
  14. Surg Endosc. 1999 Feb;13(2):127-32 [PMID: 9918612]
  15. Vision Res. 1976;16(8):839-45 [PMID: 960611]
  16. Percept Mot Skills. 1979 Apr;48(2):343-50 [PMID: 461032]
  17. Percept Mot Skills. 1989 Feb;68(1):243-51 [PMID: 2928053]
  18. Perception. 1995;24(10):1165-76 [PMID: 8577575]
  19. Neuron. 2003 Jul 31;39(3):569-76 [PMID: 12895428]
  20. Curr Biol. 1999 Nov 18;9(22):1315-8 [PMID: 10574764]
  21. World J Surg. 2001 Nov;25(11):1419-27 [PMID: 11760746]
  22. Vision Res. 1984;24(12):1789-98 [PMID: 6534002]
  23. Nature. 2001 Feb 22;409(6823):1040-2 [PMID: 11234012]
  24. Nature. 1982 Dec 9;300(5892):523-5 [PMID: 7144903]
  25. Nature. 1990 Mar 1;344(6261):60-2 [PMID: 2304555]
  26. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jan 6;106(1):298-303 [PMID: 19114661]
  27. Curr Biol. 2010 May 25;20(10):R436-7 [PMID: 20504749]
  28. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 May;16(2):317-31 [PMID: 2142202]
  29. Hum Factors. 2006 Spring;48(1):23-38 [PMID: 16696254]
  30. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1980 Jul 8;290(1038):137-51 [PMID: 6106234]
  31. Psychol Rev. 1962 Nov;69:477-91 [PMID: 13947730]
  32. Nat Neurosci. 2002 Jun;5(6):598-604 [PMID: 12021763]
  33. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;81:171-6 [PMID: 11317733]

MeSH Term

Attention
Humans
Motion Perception
Optical Illusions
Orientation

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0aperturemotioneffectcontour'sdirectionobserversperceptionattentionalloadcontourorientationline'smeasuredeffectsimplicationsmovingfeaturelessviewedstationarycircularoccludesendpointsmovesnon-parallelreportperpendicularregardlessactualtypicalstudiesmadeperceptualjudgmentsactivelycontrolledadditiondemonstratedinfluencedActivecontrolreducedeliminateResultstheoreticalpracticaldesigntechnologieslimitobserver'sfield-of-viewsurgicalcamerasActioncaninfluence

Similar Articles

Cited By