Implication of two in-stream processes in the fate of nutrients discharged by sewage system into a temporary river.

Arthur David, Jean-Louis Perrin, David Rosain, Claire Rodier, Bernadette Picot, Marie-George Tournoud
Author Information
  1. Arthur David: Université Montpellier 2, Hydrosciences Montpellier, UMR 5569, 34095, Montpellier Cedex 5, France. art61@haotmail.com

Abstract

The aim of this study was to better understand the fate of nutrients discharged by sewage treatment plants into an intermittent Mediterranean river, during a low-flow period. Many pollutants stored in the riverbed during the low-flow period can be transferred to the downstream environments during flood events. The study focused on two processes that affect the fate and the transport of nutrients, a physical process (retention in the riverbed sediments) and a biological process (denitrification). A spatial campaign was carried out during a low-flow period to characterize the nutrient contents of both water and sediments in the Vène River. The results showed high nutrient concentrations in the water column downstream of the treated wastewater disposal (up to 13,315 μg N/L for ammonium and 2,901 μg P/L for total phosphorus). Nutrient concentrations decreased rapidly downstream of the disposal whereas nutrient contents in the sediments increased (up to 1,898 and 784 μg/g for total phosphorus and Kjeldahl nitrogen, respectively). According to an in situ experiment using sediment boxes placed in the riverbed for 85 days, we estimated that the proportion of nutrients trapped in the sediments represents 25% (respectively 10%) of phosphorus (respectively nitrogen) loads lost from the water column. In parallel, laboratory tests indicated that denitrification occurred in the Vène River, and we estimated that denitrification likely coupled to nitrification processes during the 85 days of the experiment was significantly involved in the removal of nitrogen loads (up to 38%) from the water column and was greater than accumulation processes.

References

  1. Chemosphere. 2003 Feb;50(7):919-28 [PMID: 12504130]
  2. Sci Total Environ. 2003 Sep 1;313(1-3):199-212 [PMID: 12922071]
  3. Sci Total Environ. 2008 Aug 1;400(1-3):379-95 [PMID: 18804845]
  4. Science. 2001 Apr 6;292(5514):86-90 [PMID: 11292868]
  5. J Environ Qual. 2004 Jan-Feb;33(1):285-93 [PMID: 14964383]
  6. Environ Monit Assess. 2007 Jun;129(1-3):461-70 [PMID: 17057967]
  7. Sci Total Environ. 2005 Jan 5;336(1-3):225-41 [PMID: 15589261]
  8. Sci Total Environ. 2002 Jan 23;282-283:175-203 [PMID: 11846070]
  9. Sci Total Environ. 2002 Jan 23;282-283:341-51 [PMID: 11846078]
  10. Sci Total Environ. 2005 Jul 15;347(1-3):217-29 [PMID: 15878611]
  11. Science. 1971 Mar 12;171(3975):1008-13 [PMID: 4993386]
  12. Sci Total Environ. 1997 Oct 7;205(1):25-49 [PMID: 9352669]
  13. Water Res. 2001 Oct;35(14):3478-82 [PMID: 11547871]
  14. J Environ Qual. 2010 Feb 19;39(2):449-59 [PMID: 20176818]

MeSH Term

Denitrification
Environmental Monitoring
Geologic Sediments
Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Rivers
Seasons
Sewage
Waste Disposal, Fluid
Water Pollutants, Chemical

Chemicals

Sewage
Water Pollutants, Chemical
Phosphorus
Nitrogen

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0nutrientsprocessessedimentswaterfatelow-flowperiodriverbeddownstreamdenitrificationnutrientcolumnphosphorusnitrogenrespectivelystudydischargedsewagerivertwoprocesscontentsVèneRiverconcentrationsdisposalμgtotalexperiment85daysestimatedloadsaimbetterunderstandtreatmentplantsintermittentMediterraneanManypollutantsstoredcantransferredenvironmentsfloodeventsfocusedaffecttransportphysicalretentionbiologicalspatialcampaigncarriedcharacterizeresultsshowedhightreatedwastewater13315N/Lammonium2901P/LNutrientdecreasedrapidlywhereasincreased1898784μg/gKjeldahlAccordingsituusingsedimentboxesplacedproportiontrappedrepresents25%10%lostparallellaboratorytestsindicatedoccurredlikelycouplednitrificationsignificantlyinvolvedremoval38%greateraccumulationImplicationin-streamsystemtemporary

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)