Improving visual sensitivity with subthreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Arman Abrahamyan, Colin W G Clifford, Ehsan Arabzadeh, Justin A Harris
Author Information
  1. Arman Abrahamyan: School of Psychology, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.

Abstract

We probed for improvement of visual sensitivity in human participants using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Stimulation of visual cortex can induce an illusory visual percept known as a phosphene. It is known that TMS, delivered at intensities above the threshold to induce phosphenes, impairs the detection of visual stimuli. We investigated how the detection of a simple visual stimulus is affected by TMS applied to visual cortex at or below the phosphene threshold. Participants performed the detection task while the contrast of the visual stimulus was varied from trial to trial according to an adaptive staircase procedure. Detection of the stimulus was enhanced when a single pulse of TMS was delivered to the contralateral visual cortex 100 or 120 ms after stimulus onset at intensities just below the phosphene threshold. No improvement in visual sensitivity was observed when TMS was applied to the visual cortex in the opposite hemisphere (ipsilateral to the visual stimulus). We conclude that TMS-induced neuronal activity can sum with stimulus-evoked activity to augment visual perception.

References

  1. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Apr;71(3):435-43 [PMID: 19304634]
  2. Psychol Sci. 2008 Jul;19(7):635-41 [PMID: 18727775]
  3. J Neurosci. 2009 Jun 17;29(24):7679-85 [PMID: 19535579]
  4. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000 Oct;1(1):73-9 [PMID: 11252771]
  5. J Physiol. 2003 Dec 1;553(Pt 2):665-79 [PMID: 12963791]
  6. PLoS One. 2010 Apr 28;5(4):e10354 [PMID: 20442776]
  7. J Neurophysiol. 2006 Jan;95(1):271-83 [PMID: 16192327]
  8. Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42 [PMID: 9176953]
  9. Psychol Res. 2007 Nov;71(6):659-66 [PMID: 16642347]
  10. Vision Res. 1999 Aug;39(16):2729-37 [PMID: 10492833]
  11. Curr Biol. 2007 Mar 20;17(6):R196-9 [PMID: 17371754]
  12. Cortex. 2009 Oct;45(9):1025-34 [PMID: 19027896]
  13. Lancet. 1985 May 11;1(8437):1106-7 [PMID: 2860322]
  14. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989 Nov-Dec;74(6):458-62 [PMID: 2480226]
  15. Science. 2007 Sep 28;317(5846):1918-21 [PMID: 17901333]
  16. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1991;43:121-34 [PMID: 1773752]
  17. Vision Res. 1974 Oct;14(10):1039-42 [PMID: 4432385]
  18. Neuron. 2007 Jul 19;55(2):187-99 [PMID: 17640522]
  19. Neuroreport. 2000 Sep 28;11(14):3269-73 [PMID: 11043562]
  20. J Vis. 2007 Jan 11;7(1):3 [PMID: 17461671]
  21. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Apr;20(4):734-40 [PMID: 18052790]
  22. PLoS Biol. 2005 Nov;3(11):e362 [PMID: 16218766]
  23. Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6 [PMID: 9176952]

MeSH Term

Adult
Female
Humans
Male
Photic Stimulation
Psychomotor Performance
Reaction Time
Sensory Thresholds
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Visual Perception
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0visualTMSstimuluscortexsensitivityphosphenethresholddetectionimprovementtranscranialmagneticstimulationcaninduceknowndeliveredintensitiesappliedtrialactivityprobedhumanparticipantsusingStimulationillusoryperceptphosphenesimpairsstimuliinvestigatedsimpleaffectedParticipantsperformedtaskcontrastvariedaccordingadaptivestaircaseprocedureDetectionenhancedsinglepulsecontralateral100120msonsetjustobservedoppositehemisphereipsilateralconcludeTMS-inducedneuronalsumstimulus-evokedaugmentperceptionImprovingsubthreshold

Similar Articles

Cited By (24)