ECG interpretation skills of South African Emergency Medicine residents.

Japie de Jager, Lee Wallis, David Maritz
Author Information
  1. Japie de Jager: Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town and Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X24, Bellville, 7535 South Africa.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use and interpretation of electrocardiograms (ECGs) are widely accepted as an essential core skill in Emergency Medicine. It is imperative that emergency physicians are expert in ECG interpretation when they exit their training programme.
AIM: It is unknown whether South African Emergency Medicine trainees are getting the necessary skills in ECG interpretation during the training programme. Currently there are no clear criteria to assess emergency physicians' competency in ECG interpretation in South Africa.
METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study of Emergency Medicine residents and recently qualified emergency physicians was conducted between August 2008 and February 2009 using a focused questionnaire.
RESULTS: At the time of the study, there were 55 eligible trainees in South Africa. A total of 55 assessments were distributed; 50 were returned (91%) and 49 were fully completed (89%). In this study, we found the overall average score of ECG interpretation was 46.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 41.5-51.2%]. The junior group had an overall average of 42.2% (95% CI 36.9-47.5%), whereas the senior group managed 52.5% (95% CI 43.4-61.5%).
CONCLUSION: In this prospective cross-sectional study of Emergency Medicine residents and recently qualified emergency physicians, we found that there was improvement in the interpretation of ECGs with increased seniority. There exists, however, a low level of accuracy for many of the critical ECG diagnoses. The average score of 46.4% obtained in this study is lower than the scores obtained by other international studies from countries where Emergency Medicine is a well-established speciality.

Keywords

References

  1. Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Apr;19(2):143-50 [PMID: 17448100]
  2. Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Apr;8(4):349-60 [PMID: 11282670]
  3. Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Oct;60(10):1194-7 [PMID: 16669830]
  4. Ann Intern Med. 2003 May 6;138(9):751-60 [PMID: 12729431]
  5. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jan 22;51(3):335-8 [PMID: 18206749]
  6. J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Feb;14(2):126-9 [PMID: 10051784]
  7. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989 Nov 1;14(5):1127-38 [PMID: 2681318]
  8. J Intern Med. 1992 Apr;231(4):407-12 [PMID: 1588267]
  9. JAMA. 2004 Oct 6;292(13):1602-9 [PMID: 15467063]
  10. Am J Med. 2005 Aug;118(8):873-80 [PMID: 16084180]
  11. Postgrad Med J. 1995 Mar;71(833):132-5 [PMID: 7746770]
  12. J Electrocardiol. 2006 Jan;39(1):110-1 [PMID: 16387062]
  13. J Electrocardiol. 2009 Jul-Aug;42(4):339-44 [PMID: 19268967]
  14. Lancet. 1996 Sep 21;348(9030):771-5 [PMID: 8813982]
  15. Lancet. 1994 Feb 5;343(8893):311-22 [PMID: 7905143]
  16. Cardiol Clin. 2006 Aug;24(3):305-7, vii [PMID: 16939824]
  17. Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Dec;46(6):507-11 [PMID: 16308065]
  18. Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Jan;27(1):16-21 [PMID: 8572442]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0interpretationEmergencyECGMedicinestudyemergencySouthresidentsphysiciansaverageCI5%ECGstrainingprogrammeAfricantraineesskillsAfricaprospectivecross-sectionalrecentlyqualified55foundoverallscore464%group95%obtainedBACKGROUND:useelectrocardiogramswidelyacceptedessentialcoreskillimperativeexpertexitAIM:unknownwhethergettingnecessaryCurrentlyclearcriteriaassessphysicians'competencyMETHODS:conductedAugust2008February2009usingfocusedquestionnaireRESULTS:timeeligibletotalassessmentsdistributed50returned91%49fullycompleted89%[95%confidenceinterval415-512%]junior422%369-47whereasseniormanaged52434-61CONCLUSION:improvementincreasedseniorityexistshoweverlowlevelaccuracymanycriticaldiagnoseslowerscoresinternationalstudiescountrieswell-establishedspecialityEducationmedicineInterpretationTeaching

Similar Articles

Cited By