Deletion of the GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit impairs recency-dependent object recognition memory.

David J Sanderson, Emma Hindley, Emily Smeaton, Nick Denny, Amy Taylor, Chris Barkus, Rolf Sprengel, Peter H Seeburg, David M Bannerman
Author Information
  1. David J Sanderson: Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3UD, United Kingdom. david.sanderson@psy.ox.ac.uk

Abstract

Deletion of the GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit impairs short-term spatial recognition memory. It has been suggested that short-term recognition depends upon memory caused by the recent presentation of a stimulus that is independent of contextual-retrieval processes. The aim of the present set of experiments was to test whether the role of GluA1 extends to nonspatial recognition memory. Wild-type and GluA1 knockout mice were tested on the standard object recognition task and a context-independent recognition task that required recency-dependent memory. In a first set of experiments it was found that GluA1 deletion failed to impair performance on either of the object recognition or recency-dependent tasks. However, GluA1 knockout mice displayed increased levels of exploration of the objects in both the sample and test phases compared to controls. In contrast, when the time that GluA1 knockout mice spent exploring the objects was yoked to control mice during the sample phase, it was found that GluA1 deletion now impaired performance on both the object recognition and the recency-dependent tasks. GluA1 deletion failed to impair performance on a context-dependent recognition task regardless of whether object exposure in knockout mice was yoked to controls or not. These results demonstrate that GluA1 is necessary for nonspatial as well as spatial recognition memory and plays an important role in recency-dependent memory processes.

References

  1. Nat Neurosci. 2002 Sep;5(9):868-73 [PMID: 12195431]
  2. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Jan;2(1):51-61 [PMID: 11253359]
  3. Behav Neurosci. 2005 Apr;119(2):557-66 [PMID: 15839802]
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 May 28;99(11):7740-5 [PMID: 12032353]
  5. Science. 1999 Jun 11;284(5421):1805-11 [PMID: 10364547]
  6. Brain Res. 1987 Apr 14;409(1):158-62 [PMID: 3107754]
  7. Behav Brain Res. 1988 Nov 1;31(1):47-59 [PMID: 3228475]
  8. J Neurosci. 2003 May 1;23(9):3953-9 [PMID: 12736365]
  9. Cereb Cortex. 2003 Jul;13(7):793-805 [PMID: 12816895]
  10. Learn Mem. 2009 May 23;16(6):379-86 [PMID: 19470654]
  11. Learn Behav. 2004 May;32(2):220-9 [PMID: 15281394]
  12. Learn Mem. 2002 Mar-Apr;9(2):49-57 [PMID: 11992015]
  13. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011 Apr;37(2):189-99 [PMID: 21319917]
  14. Behav Neurosci. 2007 Feb;121(1):218-23 [PMID: 17324066]
  15. Q J Exp Psychol B. 1998 Feb;51(1):75-90 [PMID: 9532963]
  16. Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jul;48(8):2303-15 [PMID: 20350557]
  17. J Neurosci. 2004 May 12;24(19):4596-604 [PMID: 15140931]
  18. Mol Psychiatry. 2008 Jun;13(6):631-40 [PMID: 17684498]
  19. Learn Mem. 2011 Feb 16;18(3):128-31 [PMID: 21325433]
  20. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Mar;4(3):193-202 [PMID: 12612632]
  21. Behav Brain Res. 1998 Dec;97(1-2):107-13 [PMID: 9867236]
  22. Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Mar;29(6):1141-52 [PMID: 19302150]
  23. Behav Neurosci. 2007 Jun;121(3):559-69 [PMID: 17592947]
  24. PLoS Biol. 2006 Nov;4(12):e424 [PMID: 17132050]
  25. Hippocampus. 2010 Oct;20(10):1139-53 [PMID: 19847786]
  26. Behav Brain Res. 1999 Mar;99(2):191-200 [PMID: 10512585]
  27. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Nov;22(11):2530-40 [PMID: 19925206]
  28. Behav Processes. 2000 Jul 7;50(1):19-29 [PMID: 10925033]
  29. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jan;10(1):14-23 [PMID: 16321563]

Grants

  1. /Wellcome Trust
  2. 084655/Wellcome Trust
  3. 087736/Wellcome Trust
  4. 074385/Wellcome Trust

MeSH Term

Animals
Exploratory Behavior
Female
Mice
Mice, Knockout
Receptors, AMPA
Recognition, Psychology

Chemicals

Receptors, AMPA

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0GluA1recognitionmemorymiceobjectrecency-dependentknockouttaskdeletionperformanceDeletionAMPAreceptorsubunitimpairsshort-termspatialprocessessetexperimentstestwhetherrolenonspatialfoundfailedimpairtasksobjectssamplecontrolsyokedsuggesteddependsuponcausedrecentpresentationstimulusindependentcontextual-retrievalaimpresentextendsWild-typetestedstandardcontext-independentrequiredfirsteitherHoweverdisplayedincreasedlevelsexplorationphasescomparedcontrasttimespentexploringcontrolphasenowimpairedcontext-dependentregardlessexposureresultsdemonstratenecessarywellplaysimportant

Similar Articles

Cited By