Randomized trial of bulb syringes for earwax: impact on health service utilization.

Richard Coppin, Dorothy Wicke, Paul Little
Author Information
  1. Richard Coppin: Research & Development Office, The Surgery, Overton, Hampshire, United Kingdom. richard.coppin@nhs.net

Abstract

PURPOSE: Bulb syringes can be used for the self-clearance of earwax and, in the short term, appear effective. We compared the long-term effectiveness of self-irrigation using a bulb syringe with routine care in United Kingdom (UK) family practice clinics where irrigating ears to remove wax is a common procedure.
METHODS: We assessed the impact on health service utilization as a follow-up to a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of 237 patients attending 7 UK family practice clinics with symptomatic, occluding earwax who were randomized to an intervention group (ear drops, bulb syringe, instructions on its use and reuse) or a control group (ear drops, then clinic irrigation). After 2 years, a retrospective notes search for earwax-related consultations was carried out. We used an intention-to-treat analysis to assess differences in dichotomous outcomes between groups.
RESULTS: In the 2-year trial follow-up, more control group patients returned with episodes of earwax: 85 of 117 (73%) control vs 70 of 117 (60%) intervention, χ(2)=4.30; P = .038; risk ratio 1.21 (95% CI, 1.01-1.37). The numbers of consultations amounted to 1.15 (control) vs 0.64 (intervention) (incidence rate ratio 1.79; 95% CI, 1.05-3.04, P = .032), ie, a difference of 0.50 consultations, thus saving a consultation on average for every 2 people.
CONCLUSION: For patients who have not already tried bulb syringes, self-irrigation using a bulb syringe significantly reduces subsequent demand for ear irrigation by health professionals. Advocating the initial use of bulb syringes could reduce demand for ear irrigation in family practice clinics.

Associated Data

ISRCTN | ISRCTN71172551

References

  1. Fam Pract. 2004 Aug;21(4):413-4 [PMID: 15249529]
  2. Laryngoscope. 1991 Jan;101(1 Pt 1):75-8 [PMID: 1984556]
  3. Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jun;14(28):1-192 [PMID: 20546687]
  4. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Sep;139(3 Suppl 2):S1-S21 [PMID: 18707628]
  5. QJM. 2004 Aug;97(8):477-88 [PMID: 15256605]
  6. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD004326 [PMID: 19160236]
  7. Ear Nose Throat J. 1998 Jul;77(7):541-6, 548 [PMID: 9693470]
  8. JAMA. 1998 Nov 18;280(19):1690-1 [PMID: 9832001]
  9. Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Jan;58(546):44-9 [PMID: 18186996]
  10. BMJ. 1990 Dec 1;301(6763):1251-3 [PMID: 2271824]
  11. N Z Med J. 1998 Nov 13;111(1077):422-4 [PMID: 9861921]

Grants

  1. /Department of Health

MeSH Term

Cerumen
Ear Canal
Female
Health Services
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Self Care
Syringes

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bulb1syringesearcontrolsyringefamilypracticeclinicshealthtrialpatientsinterventiongroupirrigation2consultationsusedearwaxself-irrigationusingUKimpactserviceutilizationfollow-uprandomizeddropsuseearwax:117vsP=ratio95%CI0demandPURPOSE:Bulbcanself-clearanceshorttermappeareffectivecomparedlong-termeffectivenessroutinecareUnitedKingdomirrigatingearsremovewaxcommonprocedureMETHODS:assessedsingle-blindcontrolled237attending7symptomaticoccludinginstructionsreuseclinicyearsretrospectivenotessearchearwax-relatedcarriedintention-to-treatanalysisassessdifferencesdichotomousoutcomesgroupsRESULTS:2-yearreturnedepisodes8573%7060%χ=430038risk2101-137numbersamounted1564incidencerate7905-304032iedifference50thussavingconsultationaverageeverypeopleCONCLUSION:alreadytriedsignificantlyreducessubsequentprofessionalsAdvocatinginitialreduceRandomized

Similar Articles

Cited By