Dynamic habitat models: using telemetry data to project fisheries bycatch.

Ramūnas Zydelis, Rebecca L Lewison, Scott A Shaffer, Jeffrey E Moore, Andre M Boustany, Jason J Roberts, Michelle Sims, Daniel C Dunn, Benjamin D Best, Yann Tremblay, Michelle A Kappes, Patrick N Halpin, Daniel P Costa, Larry B Crowder
Author Information
  1. Ramūnas Zydelis: Center for Marine Conservation, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University Marine Laboratory, 135 Duke Marine Laboratory Road, Beaufort, NC 28516, USA. rzy@dhi.dk

Abstract

Fisheries bycatch is a recognized threat to marine megafauna. Addressing bycatch of pelagic species however is challenging owing to the dynamic nature of marine environments and vagility of these organisms. In order to assess the potential for species to overlap with fisheries, we propose applying dynamic habitat models to determine relative probabilities of species occurrence for specific oceanographic conditions. We demonstrate this approach by modelling habitats for Laysan (Phoebastria immutabilis) and black-footed albatrosses (Phoebastria nigripes) using telemetry data and relating their occurrence probabilities to observations of Hawaii-based longline fisheries in 1997-2000. We found that modelled habitat preference probabilities of black-footed albatrosses were high within some areas of the fishing range of the Hawaiian fleet and such preferences were important in explaining bycatch occurrence. Conversely, modelled habitats of Laysan albatrosses overlapped little with Hawaii-based longline fisheries and did little to explain the bycatch of this species. Estimated patterns of albatross habitat overlap with the Hawaiian fleet corresponded to bycatch observations: black-footed albatrosses were more frequently caught in this fishery despite being 10 times less abundant than Laysan albatrosses. This case study demonstrates that dynamic habitat models based on telemetry data may help to project interactions with pelagic animals relative to environmental features and that such an approach can serve as a tool to guide conservation and management decisions.

References

  1. Oecologia. 1983 Feb;56(2-3):234-238 [PMID: 28310199]
  2. Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 22;278(1713):1786-93 [PMID: 21106591]
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 19;106(20):8245-50 [PMID: 19416811]
  4. Bioinformatics. 2005 Oct 15;21(20):3940-1 [PMID: 16096348]
  5. PLoS One. 2007 Oct 17;2(10):e1041 [PMID: 17940605]
  6. Conserv Biol. 2007 Oct;21(5):1155-64 [PMID: 17883481]
  7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 22;103(34):12799-802 [PMID: 16908846]
  8. Zoolog Sci. 2004 Jul;21(7):771-83 [PMID: 15277721]
  9. J Exp Biol. 2006 Jan;209(Pt 1):128-40 [PMID: 16354784]
  10. Integr Comp Biol. 2010 Dec;50(6):1018-30 [PMID: 21558256]
  11. Ecol Appl. 2008 Mar;18(2):290-308 [PMID: 18488597]

MeSH Term

Animals
Birds
Computer Simulation
Conservation of Natural Resources
Ecosystem
Fisheries
Models, Biological
Mortality
Pacific Ocean
Population Dynamics
Species Specificity
Telemetry

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bycatchhabitatalbatrossesspeciesfisheriesdynamicprobabilitiesoccurrenceLaysanblack-footedtelemetrydatamarinepelagicoverlapmodelsrelativeapproachhabitatsPhoebastriausingHawaii-basedlonglinemodelledHawaiianfleetlittleprojectFisheriesrecognizedthreatmegafaunaAddressinghoweverchallengingowingnatureenvironmentsvagilityorganismsorderassesspotentialproposeapplyingdeterminespecificoceanographicconditionsdemonstratemodellingimmutabilisnigripesrelatingobservations1997-2000foundpreferencehighwithinareasfishingrangepreferencesimportantexplainingConverselyoverlappedexplainEstimatedpatternsalbatrosscorrespondedobservations:frequentlycaughtfisherydespite10timeslessabundantcasestudydemonstratesbasedmayhelpinteractionsanimalsenvironmentalfeaturescanservetoolguideconservationmanagementdecisionsDynamicmodels:

Similar Articles

Cited By